Rugged Terrain vs. All-Terrain vs. Mud-Terrain Tires
Any off-road gearhead with a bit of dirt under their fingernails is sure to know that traction is a huge part of a great day on the trail. All the locking differentials and beadlock wheels in the world – or horsepower and torque, for that matter – won’t stand a chance in the tough stuff if the tires on yer rig are bald as Homer Simpson. This is why some drivers end up enduring YouTube infamy thanks to viral videos caught at the most inopportune moments.
But wading through tire selection can be a trial. Even if a person has a brace of favorite brands, rubber companies tend to offer multiple types of tires, all of which are suited for different environments. Some will get the job done off-road but then mercilessly beat you senseless on the drive home. Others do the inverse, leaving you stuck in a spot where Murphy’s Law guarantees there’s no cell service even though there were three bars the last time you were at that location.
All-terrain tires are a popular option in this segment, providing a decent amount of grip off-road but not contributing to one’s Tylenol budget when driving on paved roads. After all, most 4x4 owners use their rigs for daily-ish use during the week in addition to wheeling on Saturday and Sunday. A bit of compromise can go a long way – but don’t tell your spouse we said that.
Promoted Product: Blackhawk Ridgecrawler R/T
When it comes to trucks and SUVs, many of us use either an all-terrain tire (good traction in off-road conditions as well as good road manners for everyday driving), and mud-terrain tires (designed for outstanding traction where the pavement ends, but they aren’t designed for pavement pounding). Rugged-terrain tires fit somewhere in between, with open tread patterns and big lugs for mud and other traction-poor conditions, yet have close enough tread for decent road manners, too. Blackhawk Ridgecrawler R/T tires are a great choice for those looking for an aggressive tire that won’t let you down on the road, too. The Ridgecrawler R/T has consistent grip and performance in various weather conditions. The 3PMS-certified badge lets drivers know this tire can handle winter weather and 3D sipes provide outstanding wet traction. The tire has an optimized wide-footprint tread design providing excellent grip that enhances control on any surface. The durable and aggressive sidewall lugs provide extra traction and protection to help pull you out of ruts and holes while helping prevent cuts and snags. The sidewall stiffness also helps when you air down on the trails.
All-terrains are often (but not always) denoted by an A/T designation either on the sidewall on in an official name. They usually feature large tread blocks which are staggered to provide a wide void ratio, meaning there’s more space between the chunky tread blocks than generally found in the tread of passenger car tires. This design is part of the secret sauce which permits these hoops to work well on dirt and but also provide a measure of comfort on pavement.
Some all-terrains, such as the BFGoodrich KO2, have little triangles molded into the rubber in those voids, operating as stone ejectors to fling pebbles out of the tread pattern instead of leaving them stuck in there like a peppercorn in yer teeth. Same goes for thin elevated lines molded into voids between tread blocks on the shoulder, designed to flex a bit and break any suction action causing mud to stick in tire which can scupper traction.
Sipes – those little squiggly lines in each tread block – permit the tire a skiff of extra grip on paved or concrete surfaces, since the action of pressing them into a hard surface opens them apart slightly to create extra biting surfaces. This feature can also contribute to these tires earning the three-peak mountain snowflake (aka ‘winter tire’) designation, but not always.
Mud-terrain tires are the burly brother of all-terrains, shrugging off rocky terrains and mires with absolute ease. This is thanks to huge, staggered tread blocks which have even more void between them than on all-terrains. This allows the tire to easily conquer loose or soft terrain and power through deep mud – hence their name. For drivers frequently taking their 4x4s into the wilds of a wood or the pits of mucky despair, this type of tire is a smart choice.
But, as with most things in life, there are trade-offs. Those huge tread voids which pay dividends off-road create an extreme amount of noise on pavement, and anyone whose commute includes concrete freeways should investigate a set of OSHA-approved ear protectors (not really, but you get the point). Dry traction suffers with mud-terrain tires since the very same rubber compound that eat mud for breakfast can get squirrely and squishy when driving to the mall. As an aside, many mud-terrain tires don’t have a mileage warranty or guarantee thanks to their intended lot in life. They can also be a challenge to keep properly balanced. Shop wisely.
Finally, alert readers will have noted the emergence of a new(ish) type of tire referred to as a rugged-terrain unit. Always looking for a new niche to occupy, rubber companies have seized upon the notion that there is a sliver of market between A/T and M/T tires, perhaps seeking to serve customers who want the look of a mud-terrain tire on their rig without the attendant noise-induced headaches on paved roads. Tough, sculptured tread blocks bring the grip while stout multi-ply sidewalls provide a measure of on-pavement handling whilst offering cut and chip resistance in tough conditions.
In making this hybrid tire, companies have attempted to make tread patterns which are good in the tough stuff but not overly noisy on the road. Those same sidewalls which protect against punctures are likely to have very aggressive designs on these R/T tires, thanks to customers who often want their vehicle to look as aggressive as possible – even if they only wheel on the scattered weekend when the kids aren’t in school. Expect to find both LT and flotation sizes for this category of tire.
[Product Image: Blackhawk Tire]
Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.
Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.
More by Matthew Guy
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- KOKing I owned a Paul Bracq-penned BMW E24 some time ago, and I recently started considering getting Sacco's contemporary, the W124 coupe.
- Bob The answer is partially that stupid manufacturers stopped producing desirable PHEVs.I bought my older kid a beautiful 2011 Volt, #584 off the assembly line and #000007 for HOV exemption in MD. We love the car. It was clearly an old guy's car, and his kids took away his license.It's a perfect car for a high school kid, really. 35 miles battery range gets her to high school, job, practice, and all her friend's houses with a trickle charge from the 120V outlet. In one year (~7k miles), I have put about 10 gallons of gas in her car, and most of that was for the required VA emissions check minimum engine runtime.But -- most importantly -- that gas tank will let her make the 300-mile trip to college in one shot so that when she is allowed to bring her car on campus, she will actually get there!I'm so impressed with the drivetrain that I have active price alerts for the Cadillac CT6 2.0e PHEV on about 12 different marketplaces to replace my BMW. Would I actually trade in my 3GT for a CT6? Well, it depends on what broke in German that week....
- ToolGuy Different vehicle of mine: A truck. 'Example' driving pattern: 3/3/4 miles. 9/12/12/9 miles. 1/1/3/3 miles. 5/5 miles. Call that a 'typical' week. Would I ever replace the ICE powertrain in that truck? No, not now. Would I ever convert that truck to EV? Yes, very possibly. Would I ever convert it to a hybrid or PHEV? No, that would be goofy and pointless. 🙂
- ChristianWimmer Took my ‘89 500SL R129 out for a spin in his honor (not a recent photo).Other great Mercedes’ designers were Friedrich Geiger, who styled the 1930s 500K/540K Roadsters and my favorite S-Class - the W116 - among others. Paul Bracq is also a legend.RIP, Bruno.
- ToolGuy Currently my drives tend to be either extra short or fairly long. (We'll pick that vehicle over there and figure in the last month, 5 miles round trip 3 times a week, plus 1,000 miles round trip once.) The short trips are torture for the internal combustion powertrain, the long trips are (relative) torture for my wallet. There is no possible way that the math works to justify an 'upgrade' to a more efficient ICE, or an EV, or a hybrid, or a PHEV. Plus my long trips tend to include (very) out of the way places. One day the math will work and the range will work and the infrastructure will work (if the range works) and it will work in favor of a straight EV (purchased used). At that point the short trips won't be torture for the EV components and the long trips shouldn't hurt my wallet. What we will have at that point is the steady drip-drip-drip of long-term battery degradation. (I always pictured myself buying generic modular replacement cells at Harbor Freight or its future equivalent, but who knows if that will be possible). The other option that would almost possibly work math-wise would be to lease a new EV at some future point (but the payment would need to be really right). TL;DR: ICE now, EV later, Hybrid maybe, PHEV probably never.
Comments
Join the conversation