Weird Wheels: GM Selling Tiny Convertible EV Via Chinese Lottery
With a majority of automakers snubbing the upcoming auto show in Detroit, there’s not likely to be much to talk about in terms of new product beyond the next-generation Ford Mustang. But there are interesting things happening elsewhere on the planet if we’re using interesting as a polite euphemism for strange.
General Motors’ joint operation in China, SAIC-GM-Wuling Automobile Co., is releasing a poverty-tier convertible that makes the long-dead Chrysler Sebring look positively decadent by comparison. Based on the Wuling Hongguang Mini EV – a boxy microcar that only measures 114.8 inches in length – the Cabrio will be a limited production convertible requiring Chinese customers to participate in a lottery.
While Kei Cars have existed in Japan for decades (some of which actually seem to be great little automobiles), something this small is a rarity on the U.S. market and even kind of petite for the Japanese micro-segment.
For the sake of comparison, the diminutive and soon-to-be-extinct Chevrolet Spark that’s currently available on our market is a whopping 143 inches long. It’s also 2,300 pounds with a 98-horsepower engine, whereas the standard Hongguang Mini EV (below) clocks in around 1,466 pounds and produces just 20 hp in its base format. Though the Chinese automobile does offer a 40-horsepower option, which probably isn’t too bad on something that’s not much bigger than a golf cart.
According to the South China Morning Post, the two-seat Cabrio will retail for 40,000 yuan ($5,805 USD) and be capable of 124 miles between charges. A long-range variant costing 60,000 yuan ($8,707 USD) will also be offered, housing a battery pack good for an estimated 186 miles. The state-run outlet called the vehicle’s range a “game changer” for new and/or urban car buyers considering an all-electric vehicle.
“Low-priced pure electric cars with a driving range of about 300 kilometres [sic] could attract millions of urban residents," said Gao Shen, an independent analyst from Shanghai speaking with the South China Morning Post. "Most young drivers will opt for a small EV with a modern design."
The Cabrio was unveiled as a concept at last year's Shanghai Auto Show, with Chinese media claiming it received a warm welcome. Despite the Mini EV becoming the Asian market’s most-popular electric model, nobody seems to have expected the Cabrio would be built. So SAIC-GM-Wuling has reportedly elected to keep production numbers down (between 100 and 200 examples) while running with the lottery scheme.
“The Hongguang and Cabrio EVs – and their likes – have a big market potential to tap in the coming years, because nearly 10 million university students graduate each year [in China]," said Phate Zhang, founder of the Shanghai-based EV news site CnEVpost. "Many of them want to own a car after they start working and a fancy convertible EV could be a first choice."
I wouldn’t exactly call the Cabrio a “fancy convertible.” However, EV adoption has reportedly been increasing over the last several years and is rumored to be on pace to represent 30 percent of the market by 2023. Though it’s notoriously difficult to trust Chinese outlets, which are tied to a single-party government that wants to push battery-powered vehicles by any means necessary.
Considering the glut of expensive, giant-sized EVs hitting our market, I’d almost welcome something like the Hongguang Mini here. But the range is just too small for most people’s needs and the interior volume is unlikely to support a majority of would-be customers. Another issue is the fact that the Mini and Cabrio lack any form of fast charging, meaning drivers would have to spend anywhere from 6 to 9 hours (depending on battery size) waiting for the thing to recoup electricity on a 220-volt outlet. On the current models, the 9.3-kWh pack offers just 75 miles and the 13.8-kWh unit gives 106 miles between charges. But this is supposed to come up to the figures mentioned earlier in the article, based on the latest from SAIC-GM-Wuling.
Take all of the above with a side of caution. Several Western outlets have claimed the Cabrio is expected to retail closer to 100,000 yuan ($14,500 USD) and there are even some inconsistencies within the manufacturers’ own release pertaining to the range. Specifications aside, that’s basically what the Chevy Spark costs. Though I don’t suppose it matters because the Mini EV isn’t coming here in any format. Still, one wonders if there would be an appetite (no matter how small) due to the absolutely unhinged automotive pricing we’ve been witnessing across North America. It’d also probably make a better city car than the $110,295, 9,000-pound GMC Hummer EV and actually allow someone to make the claim they’re driving an electric to help the environment without inviting someone to laugh in their face.
[Image: SAIC-GM-Wuling]
Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.
Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.
More by Matt Posky
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- 28-Cars-Later “1. The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. They have greatly increased the life-expectancy of those of us who live in “advanced” countries, but they have destabilized society, have made life unfulfilling, have subjected human beings to indignities, have led to widespread psychological suffering (in the Third World to physical suffering as well) and have inflicted severe damage on the natural world. The continued development of technology will worsen the situation. It will certainly subject human beings to greater indignities and inflict greater damage on the natural world, it will probably lead to greater social disruption and psychological suffering, and it may lead to increased physical suffering even in “advanced” countries....It would be better to dump the whole stinking system and take the consequences”― Theodore J. Kaczynski, Ph.D., Industrial Society and Its Future, 1995.
- FreedMike "Automotive connectivity has clearly been a net negative for the end user..."Really? Here's a list of all the net negatives for me:1) Instead of lugging around a road atlas or smaller maps that do nothing but distract me from driving, and don't tell me where to go once I've reached Point B, I can now just ask my car's navigation system to navigate me there. It'll even tell me how long it will take given current traffic conditions. 2) Instead of lugging around a box of a dozen or so cassette tapes that do nothing but distract me from driving, I can now just punch up a virtually endless library of music, podcasts, or audiobooks on the screen, push a button, and play them. 3) I can tell my car, "call (insert name here)" and the call is made without taking my hands off the wheel.4) I can tell my car, "text (insert name here)" and the system takes my dictation, sends me the text, and reads off any replies. 5) I can order up food on my screen, show up at the restaurant, and they'll have it waiting for me. 6) I can pull up a weather map that allows me to see things like hailstorms in my path. 7) If I'm in trouble, I can push a "SOS" button and help will be sent. 8) Using my phone, I can locate my car on a map and navigate to it on foot, and tell it to turn on the heat, A/C, or defrosters.None of these are benefits? Sorry, not sorry...I like them all. Why wouldn't I? Consumers clearly also like this stuff, and if they didn't, none of it would be included in cars. Now, maybe Matt doesn't find these to be beneficial. Fair enough! But he should not declare these things as a "net negative" for the rest of us. That's presumption. So...given all that, what's the answer here? Matt seems to think the answer is to "unplug" and go back to paper maps, boxes of music, and all that. Again, if that's Matt's bag, then fair enough. I mean, I've been there, and honestly, I don't want to go back, but if that's his bag, then go with God, I guess. But this isn't the solution for everyone, and saying otherwise is presumption. Here's a solution that DOES work for everyone: instead of throwing the baby out with the bathwater, clean the bathwater. You do that very, very simply: require clear, easy-to-understand disclosure of data sharing that happens as the result of all these connected services, and an equally clear, easy-to-understand method for opting out of said data sharing. That works better than turning the clock back to those thrilling days of 1990 when you had to refer to handwritten notes to get you to your date's house, or ripping SIM cards out of your car.
- Funky D What is the over-under for number of recalls in the first 5 years of ownership?
- Normie Dayyum! Great White Woman!The car, I mean. I could feel kinda safe in it.
- Slavuta "The telescreen received and transmitted simultaneously. Any sound that Winston made, above the level of a very low whisper, would be picked up by it; moreover, so long as he remained within the field of vision which the metal plaque commanded, he could be seen as well as heard. There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment. " --- 1984
Comments
Join the conversation
This is one lottery I wouldn't want to win!
I'd like to see cars like this in the States, as city commuter vehicles. 124 mile range is plenty for just commuting. Of course, some damn fool would insist on putting one of these on a limited access highway and trying to go long distance in it.