Ruff News for Waymo After Test Vehicle Runs Over Dog

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

ruff news for waymo after test vehicle runs over dog

A Waymo autonomous test vehicle struck and killed a small dog in San Francisco last month, with news emerging after an incident report filed with the California Department of Motor Vehicles became public. While the accident is nothing in comparison to the fatal crash from 2018, where an Uber AV killed a cyclist, it still spells bad publicity for companies hoping to field self-driving vehicles with the public’s blessing.

Alphabet’s Waymo is calling the accident “unavoidable” and this may be the case. Most of us have been in a situation where an animal darts out into traffic and directly into the vehicle we’re driving. That could be what has taken place here and is supported by the report issued by the California Department of Motor Vehicles. Local outlets, like The San Francisco Standard and KRON4 News, were the first to share the story — noting that documents allege that the dog was off its leash.

The accident took place on May 21st and is part of a sixfold increase in monthly incident reports issued by Waymo’s autonomous test vehicles. General Motors’ Cruise vehicles have also seen a dramatic uptick in negative encounters. Though it’s worth noting that both companies have been ramping up operations in 2023 in preparation for the California Public Utilities Commission allowing autonomous robotaxi to run services 24 hours a day.

From The San Francisco Standard:

The car was in "autonomous mode," but a Waymo test driver was in the driver's seat. The Waymo vehicle sustained minor damage, according to the California DMV report.
A Waymo spokesperson confirmed the incident details and said the company sends sincere condolences to the dog owner.
"The investigation is ongoing, however, the initial review confirmed that the system correctly identified the dog, which ran out from behind a parked vehicle, but was not able to avoid contact," a spokesperson said. "The trust and safety of the communities we are in is the most important thing to us, and we’re continuing to look into this on our end."

Meanwhile, San Francisco officials have been backing annoyed locals who are bemoaning AVs behaving erratically in traffic. Similar to what we’ve seen in Phoenix, Arizona, test vehicles sometimes make sudden stops when uncertain about how to navigate traffic. There have also been allegations made that the vehicles have interfered with public transit and emergency services.

Autonomous vehicles have not developed anywhere near the pace most companies had initially promised and typically require human safety drivers. But companies like Waymo and Cruise have still made headway — offering an impressive experience for riders that are only undermined when the system seems to be at a loss of what to do next.

Hitting a dog is probably not grounds to pull the plug. But it does offer those disinclined to want test-bed AVs operating near their homes more ammunition when criticizing the companies involved. Some believe that self-driving cars have not yet reached a point where they should be allowed to operate on public roads and others believe the entire premise of autonomous vehicles represents an existential threat to humans that drive for a living.

Regardless, it’s assumed that the California Public Utilities Commission will still back companies hoping to expand robotaxi operations in San Francisco, and a formal vote on the matter has been scheduled for June 29th.

[Image: Waymo]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Join the conversation
2 of 9 comments
  • David S. David S. on Jun 09, 2023

    " test vehicles sometimes make sudden stops when uncertain about how to navigate traffic."??? Test vehicles are programmed by humans, HUMANS sometimes make sudden stops when uncertain about how to navigate traffic, Duh!!

  • GrayOne GrayOne on Jun 11, 2023

    Self driving cars are going to kill dogs, kill people, crash into things, etc... just like human drivers do all of the time.

    The important question is what is the rate that those things occur. According to the NHTSA there are 1.1 traffic fatalities per 100 million miles driven. Are we going to ban self driving cars if the number isn't exactly 0 / 100 million miles driven? I think as long as the number is less than 1, it's an improvement on what we already have (human drivers).

  • Jbltg Rear bench seat does not match the front buckets. What's up?
  • Theflyersfan The two Louisville truck plants are still operating, but not sure for how much longer. I have a couple of friends who work at a manufacturing company in town that makes cooling systems for the trucks built here. And they are on pins and needles wondering if or when they get the call to not go back to work because there are no trucks being made. That's what drives me up the wall with these strikes. The auto workers still get a minimum amount of pay even while striking, but the massive support staff that builds components, staffs temp workers, runs the logistics, etc, ends up with nothing except the bare hope that the state's crippled unemployment system can help them keep afloat. In a city where shipping (UPS central hub and they almost went on strike on August 1) and heavy manufacturing (GE Appliance Park and the Ford plants) keeps tens of thousands of people employed, plus the support companies, any prolonged shutdown is a total disaster for the city as well. UAW members - you're not getting a 38% raise right away. That just doesn't happen. Start a little lower and end this. And then you can fight the good fight against the corner office staff who make millions for being in meetings all day.
  • Dusterdude The "fire them all" is looking a little less unreasonable the longer the union sticks to the totally ridiculous demands ( or maybe the members should fire theit leadership ! )
  • Thehyundaigarage Yes, Canadian market vehicles have had immobilizers mandated by transport Canada since around 2001.In the US market, some key start Toyotas and Nissans still don’t have immobilizers. The US doesn’t mandate immobilizers or daytime running lights, but they mandate TPMS, yet canada mandates both, but couldn’t care less about TPMS. You’d think we’d have universal standards in North America.
  • Alan I think this vehicle is aimed more at the dedicated offroad traveller. It costs around the same a 300 Series, so its quite an investment. It would be a waste to own as a daily driver, unless you want to be seen in a 'wank' vehicle like many Wrangler and Can Hardly Davidson types.The diesel would be the choice for off roading as its quite torquey down low and would return far superior mileage than a petrol vehicle.I would think this is more reliable than the Land Rovers, BMW make good engines.