Renault–Nissan–Mitsubishi Alliance Being Overhauled
The strategic partnership between France’s Renault and Japan’s Nissan has been a tenuous alliance throughout most of its history. However, the duo is attempting – once again – to tweak the nature of their complicated relationship in the hopes it produces better cooperation and reduced animosity.
While the stated goal was to increase economies of scale for both brands without either having to lose their autonomy, many noted that Nissan was in rough shape by 1999 and was running out of options. This laid the groundwork for nearly two decades of clandestine infighting between management and foreshadowed the scandal surrounding Carlos Ghosn – who became the CEO of both companies, often being credited as the man who saved Nissan – and several other high-ranking executives.
In May of 1999, Renault purchased a 36.8-percent stake in Nissan. This effectively saved the Japanese company’s bacon but the following years resulted in a comeback story to be envied. Nissan was quickly in a position to repay the French brand by purchasing a 15-percent stake and became the larger brand due to its sizable volume in Asia and North America. It wasn’t long before Nissan staffers were asking themselves why Renault, and thereby the French government (being the automaker’s largest shareholder), had voting rights they lacked. After all, Nissan was the larger company, and the size gap only appeared to be widening.
Renault’s influence became a source of resentment among many Nissan executives and a sizable contingent of its workforce. Japan is a country that’s pretty serious about its culture and has historically gone out of its way to protect or isolate itself from outside influence when it doesn’t appear to offer a tangible advantage. Meanwhile, the French government was seeking to expand its own influence over Renault by increasing its stake. This rubbed both companies the wrong way and resulted in a short-lived and semi-unified opposition to state influence.
While there’s certainly a lot we’re not covering, the important thing to remember is that neither company was doing all that well by 2018. However, Nissan (which had purchased a controlling stake in Mitsubishi two years earlier) had further to fall now that its booming volume had started to decline. Corporate infighting had likewise resumed and there was a surprise announcement in November that CEO Carlos Ghosn (who chaired the alliance) had been detained by Japanese authorities.
This was the tipping point.
Suspicions abounded. Many claimed this was an industrial coup, with there being a wealth of evidence to support those claims. Numerous high-ranking executives were likewise implicated in some of the financial crimes Ghosn was likewise being accused of. Ghosn had made a lot of enemies and defied Japanese tradition by snubbing promotional schemes based on seniority. He was more willing to hire outsiders into high-level positions and made a surplus of enemies as a result. While imprisoned, he alleged that these things had ensured he would not get a fair trial in Japan due to plans that he sought to further integrate Renault and Nissan. He likewise cited constantly evolving charges and a lack of cooperation from Japanese authorities.
With bail being repeatedly rejected and new claims from Renault and the French government that some of Ghosn’s money may not have been acquired legally, the man was smuggled out of the country and into Lebanon where he now lives as a fugitive.
The recent announcement that the companies have been reconsidering the relationship has been a long time coming. There have been numerous attempts to rejigger the partnership into something a bit more amicable. But it’s frequently been undermined by competing agendas. Under the revised agreement, both automakers will hold a 15-percent stake in the other. Additionally, they’ll have to match investments into Latin America, India, and Europe – regardless of which brand is more dominant in those markets. Nissan is also supposed to be investing a meaningful amount of itself into Renault’s EV and software startup Ampere.
The companies have released a joint statement acknowledging the changes. But nothing has been set in stone just yet. As things currently stand, they’ve only agreed on a basic framework for re-balancing their relationship. Finalization of the deal is expected anytime now. But there is a chance that things could still fall apart.
Renault arguably has the most to lose here. The company is reducing its stake to improve the relationship and will transfer 28.4 percent of its stake to a French trust, neutralizing its voting rights in most instances. While it can still profit from the sale of those shares, its influence over Nissan has been scaled back immensely. Meanwhile, Nissan and Mitsubishi will be getting access to Renault's new EV tech and will presumably see more autonomy than it has in years. There’s also supposed to be collaboration on numerous programs focusing on market penetration and some jointly developed vehicles.
The agreement is expected to see board approval with a formal announcement rumored to take place by February 6th.
[Image: Yuliia Lisiana/Shutterstock]
Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.
Join the conversation
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- Saeed Hello, I need a series of other accessories from Lincoln. Do you have front window, front and rear lights, etc. from the 1972 and 1976 models
- Probert Wow - so many digital renders - Ford, Stellantis. - whose next!!! They're really bringing it on....
- Zerocred So many great drives:Dalton Hwy from Fairbanks to the Arctic Circle.Alaska Marine Highway from Bellingham WA to Skagway AK. it was a multi-day ferry ride so I didn’t actually drive it, but I did take my truck.Icefields Parkway from Jasper AB to Lake Louise AB, CA.I-70 and Hwy 50 from Denver to Sacramento.Hwy 395 on the east side of the Sierras.
- Aidian Holder I'm not interested in buying anything from a company that deliberately targets all their production in crappy union-busting states. Ford decided to build their EV manufaturing in Tennessee. The company built it there because of an anti-union legal environment. I won't buy another Ford because of that. I've owned four Fords to date -- three of them pickups. I'm shopping for a new one. It won't be a Ford Lightning. If you care about your fellow workers, you won't buy one either.
- Denis Jeep have other cars?!?
They keep using the word “alliance” for this mash-up. So as usual, I ask: what will they do for an encore?! (Maybe heater cores that don’t explode, bathing the front passenger’s legs in hot coolant, would be a start!)
I don't understand how Mitsubishi is still hanging on. They have like 3 models.