Mazda’s Electric MX-30 Being Pulled From the U.S. Market
The Mazda MX-30 EV will be pulled from the U.S. market after 2023, with the manufacturer stating its preference to prioritize hybrid models. While the small crossover will live on in other parts of the world with a rotary range extender, mimicking what BMW did with the i3 with some Mazda-specific flair, the company’s first all-electric vehicle seems to have been a flop in North America.
Let’s be objective. The MX-30 EV (not to be confused with the CX-30) was always a compliance automobile. The vehicle comes with a laughably short range of 100 miles and was sold exclusively in California with sales volumes that can only be described as abysmal. Mazda sold just 181 examples of the MX-30s in 2021 and another 324 in 2022. It wasn’t a popular model and that fact doesn’t appear to be changing in 2023.
We’ve seen other brands field models with a similar trajectory before and undoubtedly will again in a bid to comply with escalating CAFE standards.
Other markets received MX-30s equipped with a 2.0-liter e-Skyactiv motor (mild hybrid) and the company debuted a plug-in hybrid with the aforementioned range extender in January of 2023. While there’s a chance the United States might someday see those versions go on sale, we recommend holding your breath. The rotary assisted PHEV doesn’t seem to be any faster and boasts an even smaller battery good for about 50 miles.
While the range extender is supposed to make that a non issue for the MX-30, the concept hasn’t resonated with American consumers — who seem to prefer traditional hybrids to EVs boasting gasoline-powered generators.
All of the above reminds us of the Fiat 500e, which the late Sergio Marchionne confessed existed solely to satisfy emission regulations. He even went so far as to request consumers not purchase the vehicle due to the fact that Fiat Chrysler Automobiles lost money on every transaction.
But the model is going back on sale in the U.S. under the Stellantis banner, with improvements to its range the company believes will make it more desirable. This may also be what’s in store for the MX-30. However, Fiat’s new leadership seems supremely interested in EV sales whereas Mazda appears to be a company that’s only doing electrification out of obligation. The Japanese brand has always seemed more interested in squeezing every drop it could out of small combustion engines than diving into battery power.
At any rate, Mazda does seem keen to offer more hybrids and has said that will be key to its current production strategy. Leadership has even suggested the MX-30 may return to our market in hybrid guise. But nothing other than the EV variant’s demise has been made official thus far.
[Images: Mazda]
Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.
Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.
More by Matt Posky
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- George Some Folks should remember the newest version of this car as the Chevy Aveo was a Free car given away by the White House when Obama was in office and made it happen for folks who had a big old truck that ate gas.so this was meant to help you get to and from work and save at the pump. But one guy was upset that he was receiving a car which he didn’t want but a truck of his choice He Should Understand This:Obama was trying to get you to point A to Point B He wasn’t trying to help you socially by telling your friends that Hey! I Got a New Truck Just Like You Do So Don’t Write Me Off just because you got a new truck and I Don’t.
- Frank I worked for a very large dealer group back in 2014 and this sat in the crown jewel spot at our GM store showroom. It sat, and sat...and sat. Thing was a boat anchor. I remember the price being insane for a re-skinned Chevy Volt that was also a boat anchor
- George When I Seen This So Called Nova(Really A Corolla Sold Elsewhere) I could tell this Car And The Corolla that you could buy here or rent at a car rental place Is very Different The interior Floor In This Nova is very high like in a rear wheel drive car where the regular Corolla the entire interior floor is several inches lower that your head doesn’t touch the ceiling and feels very roomy like in a chevette with no tightness and the Corolla gives you a option,Split folding seat backs so you can haul long items and more cargo space using your back seat area. Which you don’t get with that Nova I Wonder Why GM/ Toyota didn’t Offer things like this for this car? It would make this Nova A hit like the Corolla was. And if you bought a Metro OR Suzuki Swift You’ll Get All Of These Features Standard and ONLY Pay For A Few options Floor mats Wheels Covers Air Conditioning and Automatic transmission and that’s it I guess some buyers were buying this car as a second car just to get around by.
- Lou_BC I can't see how eliminating 2 different engine tunes is a cost saving measure. It's just programming.
- Inside Looking Out Because they have money.
Comments
Join the conversation
They're just following Toyota's lead in inching away from plug-in anything. This country is too big, and most people travel too many miles, for the urban plug-in to be a success outside of congested cities like Boston/NYC.
The market outside of those dense urban zones is much bigger (and potentially more profitable) and gas/electric hybrids make more sense. If they're not selling enough plug-ins to move the CAFE needle, more Gas/electric hybrids will.
Matt Posky hit the nail on the head: the plug-in is a CAFE compliance vehicle, and it didn't sell enough to do the job. Technically, so are the gas/electric hybrids, but they're cheaper to make and easier to sell in volume at a profit. Look for more automakers selling in the US to do the same.
I disagree with the idea that the MX-30 is a compliance vehicle. There wasn't enough production allocation to make a real difference in CAFE or emissions scores. I look at it as a real-world test platform. Its lack of sales is not really an issue for Mazda at this point. However, Mazda had better put the research to good use, because if the US government continues to follow Europe's central-planning industrial policy, gasoline engines will be stamped out within about 10 years.