Can-Am Unleashes 240-horsepower Maverick

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

While the side-by-side world isn’t our standard fare, the latest bonkers creation from Can-Am is too good not to share. For 2024, the Maverick will be available with a gobsmacking 240 horsepower from its 999cc turbocharged triple.


That’s in a machine with a listed dry weight of roughly 2,200 pounds, giving it a power-to-weight ratio roughly equal to that found in a Ram 1500 TRX which packs 702 horses for shifting its 6,400-lb mass. This thing is going to fly. Also on board is a seven-speed DCT transmission with optional paddle shifters. Drive modes abound – one shifts around 4,000 rpm, another kicks that to 8,500 rpm, while a third does the same but with a so-called anti-lag system. Expect to hear a few pops and crackles, then.


Helping it on its landing is a set of trick Can-Am shocks, with the top-tier Maverick R X RS featuring 25 inches of wheel travel (26 inches out back) when accompanied by Fox Podium Piggyback with bypasses and Smart-Shox tech at each corner. In plain English, this means there’s dual-valve compression and rebound baked into the dampers; pickup truck fans can think of them as sorta similar to the baller DSSV units found on Chevy’s brawny and capable Colorado ZR2. It's 77 inches wide on a 108-inch wheelbase, if you're wondering. The list continues with 32-inch tires, 17 inches of ground clearance, and the ability to make trail markers pregnant as you zoom past (maybe).

The cabin gets a huge tech upgrade in the form of a 10.25-inch touchscreen display, solving a long-running complaint leveled by this author every time he belted into a Can-Am over the last few years. Until now, Can-Am owners had to endure endless ribbing from their Polaris buddies whose rigs have long had snazzy RideCommand whilst they made do with what was essentially a digital alarm clock from the 1980s. Other key changes to this jaundiced eye include a gear selector which will no longer mash yer hand when shoving the thing in park. And when you’re spending carlike money on these things, this stuff matters.  

How much money? Well, it’ll cost at least $35,499 to get into a Maverick R and its 240 horses but a trim with the trick dampers will start at $44,299. For fun, we checked just about all the option boxes we could find on the configurator – including a $5,100 JL Audio sound system with six speakers and two butt thumper subwoofers – and ended up with a total easily cresting 60 large.


If you're looking for me, I'll be in the desert.


[Images: Can-Am]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 27 comments
  • Kosmo Kosmo on Aug 23, 2023

    Looks like more fun than humans should be allowed to have!


    Pointless Comparison: It weighs almost as much as my 86 Jetta did (which had a whopping 80 HP but still seemed fun at the time, what with the stick shift and all).

  • Probert Probert on Aug 23, 2023

    Like the jet ski of the desert, ready to ruin everyone else's day.

    • See 1 previous
    • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Aug 23, 2023

      Electric jet ski sounds like a pretty good idea (easier to do right now than a boat; fewer concerns with range/run time).

  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
  • SPPPP I am actually a pretty big Alfa fan ... and that is why I hate this car.
  • SCE to AUX They're spending billions on this venture, so I hope so.Investing during a lull in the EV market seems like a smart move - "buy low, sell high" and all that.Key for Honda will be achieving high efficiency in its EVs, something not everybody can do.
Next