Best and Worst Drivers by City

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

With crash statistics having taken a turn for the worse in recent years, analysts have been pouring over the relevant data to determine why. Though the resulting statistics can tell a lot of different stories, including which U.S. cities tend to boast the best and worst drivers.


Based on insurance data tabulated by LendingTree’s QuoteWizard, the cities with the worst drivers (in descending order) include Virginia Beach, VA; Dayton, OH; Riverside, CA; Indianapolis, IN; Fresno, CA; Sacramento, CA; Bakersfield, CA; Greenville, NC; Salt Lake City, UT; Los Angeles, CA; and Greensboro, NC.


The cities with the best drivers (ranked best to worst) were reportedly Detroit, MI; Little Rock, AK; Louisville, KY; Hartford, CT; Baton Rouge, LA; Lexington, KY; Oklahoma City, OK; New Orleans, LA; Philadelphia, PA; Las Vegas, NV; and Tulsa, OK.


QuoteWizard analyzed over six million car insurance quotes from drivers in the 70 largest cities in America with a focus on the number of speeding tickets, citations (other moving violations), overall accidents, and DUIs. It then ranked each city in every category, determining their final position by averaging them against each other.


The results certainly play into assumptions that California has a surplus of bad drivers. Los Angeles in particular seems rife with road rage and unpredictable traffic jams failing to coincide with rush hour. The Bay Area always seems eager to throw me on-road curve balls whenever I’m driving while lacking some of the creative solutions (and tolerance for them) found in places like New York City.


On the East Coast, driving often borders on pure chaos with everyone simultaneously adapting to the situation around them. But it often takes place at lower speeds (excluding Alaska and Hawaii, New York State has the lowest average speeds in the country) and includes officers helping to direct traffic at problem intersections at specific times of the day. Mass transit and a surplus of taxi services also help to mitigate drunk driving after the sun goes down.


Meanwhile, the West Coast offers smoother sailing at higher speeds until something suddenly goes wrong. Its sprawling geography means average trips are longer and traffic jams are harder to anticipate. But that doesn’t seem sufficient to account for the overall differences, especially considering how many dents you tend to see on vehicles parked in NYC vs. Los Angeles.


As with any study, there are some highly probable blind spots. Your author wouldn’t necessarily equate speeding with “bad driving” and an area seeing higher-than-average citations may just have a police force that’s extra focused on pulling people over.


Detroit makes for a good example. Reports have been circulating for years that Michigan has been suffering from a police officer shortage and the Motor City has been notorious for its high crime rate far longer than that. The above results may just be an issue of police having bigger fish to fry than nabbing commuters for moving violations. The state also has some of the highest speed limits in the Midwest.


Michiganders likewise tend to be speeders, making it hard to single out anybody in particular for exceeding posted limits. As someone who has done a lot of driving across the United States and is a native of The Mitten, I can tell you that most people tend to drive as fast as road conditions will allow in Michigan. Winter weather guarantees a few months of slow driving and often leaves summer pavement in mixed conditions. But, under ideal circumstances, it’s not unusual to see expressway traffic collectively averaging well above 80 mph.


Meanwhile, if we look at Detroit’s crash statistics, we can see the city boasts one of the highest fatality rates (per capita) in the nation. This is particularly interesting because the overall accident rate is quite low. Based on data tabulated by Forbes, drivers in Los Angeles are significantly more likely to experience an accident. However, while the number of crashes is modest, collisions in Detroit tend to be more severe with the grim statistics likely stemming from a combination of the city’s rougher-than-average roads, lower-than-average population density, and assumed penchant for speeding.


That’s not to suggest studies about roadway safety aren’t useful. But the above serves as an important reminder that the context of data often matters just as much as the data itself.


It’s worth looking at the insurance data provided by QuoteWizard. However, most of it just ranks how each city fared in terms of accidents, drunk driving, speeding tickets, and other citations. It’s something one should take with a side of skepticism and likely makes a better conversation starter about roadway safety than the definitive data set for which places are actually the safest.


Detroit’s high ranking may just be the result of there being fewer people willing to report minor accidents and local police not caring so much about moving violations. Then again, maybe the rougher road conditions and seasonal changes have made its drivers more skilled by throwing year-round challenges that help keep the senses sharp.

[Image: pathdoc/Shutterstock.com]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 34 comments
  • Lorenzo Lorenzo on Sep 20, 2023

    A lot of drivers in older cities with narrow winding streets get grief from others in newer cities. YOU try driving on streets laid out by meandering cows three centuries ago, EVERY DAY! It's enough to drive anyone batty eventually.

  • Alan Alan on Sep 20, 2023

    Best and worst drivers? I think driving cultures vary between cities, small variations they can be. But, when you drive in another "foreign" region these small variations become evident and sometimes annoying.


    It's the same all over the world. Each region whines about how poor others drive. The best measure of driving is looking at fatalities. Why doesn't TTAC have an article on global vehicle fatalities. This might shed some light on where the best drivers, regulations and vehicle standards are. You might be surprised where the USA sits among your peers.

  • EBFlex Garbage but for less!
  • FreedMike I actually had a deal in place for a PHEV - a Mazda CX-90 - but it turned out to be too big to fit comfortably in my garage, thus making too difficult to charge, so I passed. But from that, I learned the Truth About PHEVs - they're a VERY niche product, and probably always be, because their use case is rather nebulous. Yes, you can run on EV power for 25-30 miles, plug it in at home on a slow charger, and the next day, you're ready to go again. Great in theory, but in practice, a) you still need a home charger, b) you paid a LOT more for the car than you would have for a standard hybrid, and c) you discover the nasty secret of PHEVs, which is that when they're on battery power, they're absolute pigs to drive. Meanwhile, to maintain its' piglike battery-only performance, it still needs to be charged, so you're running into all the (overstated) challenges that BEV owners have, with none of the performance that BEV owners like. To quote King George in "Hamilton": " Awesome. Wow." In the Mazda's case, the PHEV tech was used as a performance enhancer - which worked VERY nicely - but it's the only performance-oriented PHEV out there that doesn't have a Mercedes-level pricetag. So who's the ideal owner here? Far as I can tell, it's someone who doesn't mind doing his 25 mile daily commute in a car that's slow as f*ck, but also wants to take the car on long road trips that would be inconvenient in a BEV. Meanwhile, the MPG Uber Alles buyers are VERY cost conscious - thus the MPG Uber Alles thing - and won't be enthusiastic about spending thousands more to get similar mileage to a standard hybrid. That's why the Volt failed. The tech is great for a narrow slice of buyers, but I think the real star of the PHEV revival show is the same tax credits that many BEVs get.
  • RHD The speed limit was raised from 62.1 MPH to 68.3 MPH. It's a slight difference which will, more than anything, lower the fines for the guy caught going 140 KPH.
  • Msquare The argument for unlimited autobahns has historically been that lane discipline is a life-or-death thing instead of a suggestion. That and marketing cars designed for autobahn speeds gives German automakers an advantage even in places where you can't hope to reach such speeds. Not just because of enforcement, but because of road conditions. An old Honda commercial voiced by Burgess Meredith had an Accord going 110 mph. Burgess said, "At 110 miles per hour, we have found the Accord to be quiet and comfortable. At half that speed, you may find it to be twice as quiet and comfortable." That has sold Mercedes, BMW's and even Volkswagens for decades. The Green Party has been pushing for decades for a 100 km/h blanket limit for environmental reasons, with zero success.
  • Varezhka The upcoming mild-hybrid version (aka 500 Ibrida) can't come soon enough. Since the new 500e is based on the old Alfa Mito and Opel Adam platform (now renamed STLA City) you'd have thought they've developed the gas version together.
Next