Acura ZDX Returning As Brand’s First EV
Acura has announced that its first electric vehicle will be called the ZDX – a model you might not remember if car spotting isn’t among your favorite hobbies. Introduced in 2009, the original came into being just as crossover vehicles were starting to become mainstream. But the ZDX remains an exceptionally rare bird due to it being considered an oddball in its own time. Acura only managed to move 3,200 units inside the U.S. during its first full year on sale. That also happened to be its best year by far and explains why the car was quietly killed off in 2013.
Whether Honda’s luxury division feels like the model never got the praise it deserved or simply doesn’t want to risk using a more storied nameplate for its first EV is anyone’s guess. But Acura seems eager to assure the public that the upcoming vehicle will have more in common with the older ZDX’s more-practical successors, the MDX and RDX.
"The ZDX will be Acura’s first zero-emissions SUV and the name pays homage to a previous Acura model of the same name, which was the first vehicle styled from the ground up in the Acura Design Studio which opened in Los Angeles in 2007,” the automaker explained in its release.
Assumed to be released in 2024, the new Acura ZDX is being co-developed with General Motors. This means it’ll make use of the American carmaker’s Ultium batteries until Honda has established its own electric vehicle architecture. We also know that it’ll also be designed “from the ground up” at the Acura Design Studio located in L.A.
Beyond that, we don’t have a lot of information.
Acura said that there would be a Type S designed to cater to customers interested in spirited driving. But having effectively no information on the standard unit makes speculating about the performance variant pointless. We don’t even know what type of body style the ZDX will have – though Acura did say that the production model would be inspired by the Precision EV Concept. That probably means a straight beltline and two-box design with just enough curves to keep things interesting. Come to think of it, that kind of sounds like the Cadillac Lyriq – another Ultium EV that was previously rumored to share an assembly line in Springhill, Tennessee, with the model the Precision EV Concept was supposed to foreshadow.
That could make the Lyriq a good starting point for making unsubstantiated assumptions about the ZDX. The Cadillac is roughly 197 inches in length and 78 inches wide with a single rear permanent-magnet motor and 100-kWh battery lurking beneath the floorboards. Our guess is that the Acura won’t stray too far from that recipe. While this likely means any visual influence from the previous ZDX will be minimal, something tells me this won’t be ruffling any feathers.
Interested parties wanting to know more could be in for a wait, however. Despite news of the ZDX’s upcoming arrival in 2024, it’s unlikely that Acura will have much to say for at least a few more months.
Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.
Jkross22 on Aug 22, 2022
Acura marketing believes resusitating a terrible name from a blah vehicle that was ugly and didn't sell well is a great name for their future EV?
Let me help..... Here's a name they are free to use - skidmark. I'll use it in a sentence.
The Acura marketing team is a bunch of skidmarks for thinking this is a good idea.
SPPPP on Aug 23, 2022
Well, some beloved nameplates have been resurrected and found success. There are several examples, including a number from Chrysler, like the Challenger and Charger. ( https://www.hotcars.com/best-resurrected-car-nameplates/) Some beloved nameplates have been resurrected and found a cool reception - like the Ford Thunderbird or (ominously) Acura's own NSX. The question is, what happens when you bring back an *unloved* nameplate? Oddly, Chrysler has done this to success as well, with the Pacifica. But can Acura manage it? (Edit for one more thought - This might be like Ford choosing to name its first "high-effort" EV after the Edsel, rather than the Mustang. Would Ford dare to try it, if they thought it was important?)
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- MRF 95 T-Bird The hideaway headlamps on these and other Ford vehicles of the era could have issues mostly vacuum related. Usually the vacuum hoses that ran to the actuators would deteriorate. The “coffee can” reservoir which was mounted in the front header was rarely an issue because it was protected from the elements. The other coffee can reservoir used for the HVAC controls and actuators and mounted under the passenger side wheel well had a tendency to rot away. I once replaced one on my 70 Mustang when I noticed that the vents were acting janky. Later model Fords like Fox bodies used a durable plastic globe shaped one. The radio on these 69-70 full-size Fords mounted on the left side of the aircraft style instrument cluster within the drivers touch probably disappointed many young people. “Mom will you change the station?” “Andy Williams is so square”.
- MichaelBug For me, two issues in particular:1. It can be difficult for me to maintain my lane on a rainy night. Here in southeastern PA, PennDOT's lane markings aren't very reflective. They can be almost impossible to make out when wet.2. Backing out of a parking space in a lot with heavy pedestrian traffic. Oftentimes people will walk right into my blind spot even if I am creeping back with my 4-way flashers blinking. (No backup camera in my '11 Toyota Camry.)Michael B 🙂
- Tagbert When you publish series like this, could you include links to the previous articles in the series so that we can follow through? Thank you. Edit: now I see a link embedded in the first paragraph that goes to the previous story. It wasn’t clear at first where that link went but now I understand.
- DungBeetle62 When you're in one of these, you life in a state of constant low-level nervous about 90% of the time. But that other 10% kinda makes up for it.
- Garrett Instead of foisting this problem on the car companies and the people who buy cars, make those who possess liquor licenses and those who purchase alcohol take on the economic cost of this problem.