Rare Rides Icons: The History of Kia's Larger and Full-size Sedans (Part XI)

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

Kia’s second attempt at a K7 (Cadenza in North America) arrived at a time when the company fully embraced a styling language of its own. More upscale and nicer to look at than the derivative generation of 2010 to 2016, the new Cadenza debuted in all global markets for 2017. Kia was hopeful the second Cadenza would sell better than the first one, particularly in North America. Any predictions on how that went?


With large and in-charge styling and a bevy of standard luxury features (discussed last time), Kia pitched the Cadenza to the entry-level premium full-size car buyer. Think of the customer who’d purchase a Toyota Avalon, a Buick Lacrosse, or one who might upgrade from an Impala or splurge on a low-trim Cadillac XTS. Competitive space, comfort, and sedate styling were all on offer with the new Cadenza.


Unfortunately, though the large sedan market in other places remained at least sustainable, such was not the case in North America. It had been a long decline for the large car, and even the headliner of the class (Avalon) receded from its heyday in the early 2000s. Avalon had 95,318 sales in 2005, which shrunk to 70,990 in 2013, and 32,000 in 2017. In between those points, there were plenty of sales valleys, as low as 28,390 in 2009.  


The new 2017 Cadenza waded into the dying market segment with general praise for its level of comfort, a large interior living accommodation, and its suitcase of luxury features for a reasonable asking price. Features like Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, as well as a head-up display and surround-view cameras, were available equipment often excluded from much more expensive luxury cars. The 3.3-liter V6 motivated the Cadenza in an acceptable way, as did the new eight-speed automatic. 

However, even with fancy tech features the Cadenza was very conservative in its looks and attitude and was highly unlikely to excite. While it had adequate power, it certainly wouldn’t win any driver engagement or acceleration awards. And though the equipment was nice, it was forced into three distinct packages in an all-or-nothing pricing methodology that is not typically popular with buyers. 


In fact, there were no standalone options for the new Cadenza. The base model Premium trim asked $31,990 ($39,034 adj.), while the Technology was $38,990 ($47,575 adj.). Top specification was the Limited trim, which included all the features mentioned above. However, it was a big price jump between each trim. That was especially so from Premium to Limited, which asked $44,390 ($54,164 adj.). Per trim, the Cadenza was almost always more expensive than its Avalon competition. 


Did customers bite? Not at all. In the US, Kia’s final year of the first-gen Cadenza saw 4,738 sales, and that figure improved slightly to 7,249 in 2017. Sales fell precipitously again in 2018 to 4,507, and again in 2019 to 1,577. Comparatively worse was Canada. Sales in 2016 of 166 Cadenzas fell to 124 in 2017, 83 in 2018, and 21 in 2019. Kia needed to take action!


The action chosen was a visual refresh for 2020 and a couple of engine updates. Gone for 2020 was the old 2.4-liter Theta II engine, replaced by a Smartstream 2.5-liter inline-four. Power increased from 187 to 195 horses in the engine swap. The other engine change didn't affect North America either: The 3.3-liter Lambda II engine with direct injection was replaced with a 3.5-liter Lambda II with multiport injection in some markets. Power decreased from 290 to 286 horses, and Cadenza found itself with 250 lb-ft of torque instead of 253. Interesting upgrade choice.

As far as visuals were concerned, changes occurred only to the front and rear of the Cadenza for its update. The most notable revision was to the Tiger Nose grille, as it grew larger and had fewer slats. There was also a new mesh grille texture in its background. 


The change brought the grille away from Kia’s corporate appearance and more in line with the front end of a Ford Fusion. Ditto for the headlamps, which lost their trapezoidal shape and aw their Z light signature flipped to become more of an S. The headlamp housing itself transitioned to a more rectangular lens with four LED lighting elements on either side.

While the grille was less conservative and more aggressive looking, the headlamps were the opposite. Below there was a new lower valance that saw a more aggressive use of chrome trim, and the removal of the quad fog lamps on either side. Fog lighting was replaced with a new faux vent trim and a single smaller lamp. Above the front fascia, sculpting on the hood grew stronger and more muscular, and was also more Fusion-y looking.


Though the Z lighting element was revised at the front of the Cadenza, the one at the rear remained. It was housed inside some more upscale-looking brake lamps, which were larger and sharper than they were the previous year. Kia added a heckblende to the rear, right through the middle of the trunk lid. 


Not fully lighted, the blende displayed some Morse Code dashes (a cue used on some of its other models). The trunk lid grew sharper looking with a revised upper edge and had more intense sculpting to make its design match with the new lighting. Having described the rear of the 2020 Cadenza I must draw your attention to the rear of a previously debuted vehicle: The 1997 Oldsmobile Cutlass. I didn’t want to see the similarities, either.


So then, a rapidly deployed new front and rear design that was more aggressive. Did that help the Cadenza’s sales? It never had a chance in Canada, where Kia pulled the Cadenza from the market after 2019. Two Canadian examples held out on lots until 2020 when they were finally sold. Nobody noticed the new styling in the US, as sales slumped over 2019’s figure to 1,265. 


2020 proved to be a last-of for the Cadenza in North America, as Kia canceled it. Cadenza outlived most of its large sedan competition (all of which are dead now). Unsold Cadenzas remained on U.S. dealer lots through 2021 (249) and indeed 2022 when the last remaining one was sold. To date, your author has never seen a refreshed 2020 Cadenza. 

Elsewhere in the world Cadenza’s sales failed to impress, and Kia pulled it from all global retail sales in January of 2021. It continues today in limited production as a sort of Cadenza Classic, for sale to fleet customers only. It must be an attempt to recover some of the development costs for such a short-lived model, as its replacement (the K8) is already in production. 


Meanwhile, shortly after the second Cadenza arrived Kia was prepared to build an even larger car (again) as it introduced the brand new, luxurious, and rear-drive K9. We’ll pick up there next time, with a car that’s probably the most impressive vehicle Kia’s ever produced. 


[Images: Kia]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by   subscribing to our newsletter.

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 8 comments
  • Daniel J Daniel J on Aug 11, 2022

    When this came out I was really interested in it but there were only 2 on the lot in a 250 mile range. The closest one was not the trim I was looking for. The other issue was that the the only colors that were on the lots were black and silver.


    It really seemed to me that Kia really wasn't interested in selling this.

  • Arthur Dailey Arthur Dailey on Aug 11, 2022

    As 'nice' as this car may have been, who in their target demographic would chose this over an Avalon? Particularly if the Avalon cost less.


    • BetterOne BetterOne on Aug 12, 2022

      I did, though on the Toyota side I compared it against the ES350. Exterior styling and interior layout/controls were a couple of the reasons why. And even at a higher MSRP, I can't imagine anyone even semi-skilled at negotiation has ever paid more for a Cadenza than a comparable Avalon.







  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Thankfully I don't have to deal with GDI issues in my Frontier. These cleaners should do well for me if I win.
  • Theflyersfan Serious answer time...Honda used to stand for excellence in auto engineering. Their first main claim to fame was the CVCC (we don't need a catalytic converter!) engine and it sent from there. Their suspensions, their VTEC engines, slick manual transmissions, even a stowing minivan seat, all theirs. But I think they've been coasting a bit lately. Yes, the Civic Type-R has a powerful small engine, but the Honda of old would have found a way to get more revs out of it and make it feel like an i-VTEC engine of old instead of any old turbo engine that can be found in a multitude of performance small cars. Their 1.5L turbo-4...well...have they ever figured out the oil dilution problems? Very un-Honda-like. Paint issues that still linger. Cheaper feeling interior trim. All things that fly in the face of what Honda once was. The only thing that they seem to have kept have been the sales staff that treat you with utter contempt for daring to walk into their inner sanctum and wanting a deal on something that isn't a bare-bones CR-V. So Honda, beat the rest of your Japanese and Korean rivals, and plug-in hybridize everything. If you want a relatively (in an engineering way) easy way to get ahead of the curve, raise the CAFE score, and have a major point to advertise, and be able to sell to those who can't plug in easily, sell them on something that will get, for example, 35% better mileage, plug in when you get a chance, and drives like a Honda. Bring back some of the engineering skills that Honda once stood for. And then start introducing a portfolio of EVs once people are more comfortable with the idea of plugging in. People seeing that they can easily use an EV for their daily errands with the gas engine never starting will eventually sell them on a future EV because that range anxiety will be lessened. The all EV leap is still a bridge too far, especially as recent sales numbers have shown. Baby steps. That's how you win people over.
  • Theflyersfan If this saves (or delays) an expensive carbon brushing off of the valves down the road, I'll take a case. I understand that can be a very expensive bit of scheduled maintenance.
  • Zipper69 A Mini should have 2 doors and 4 cylinders and tires the size of dinner plates.All else is puffery.
  • Theflyersfan Just in time for the weekend!!! Usual suspects A: All EVs are evil golf carts, spewing nothing but virtue signaling about saving the earth, all the while hacking the limbs off of small kids in Africa, money losing pits of despair that no buyer would ever need and anyone that buys one is a raging moron with no brains and the automakers who make them want to go bankrupt.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Usual suspects B: All EVs are powered by unicorns and lollypops with no pollution, drive like dreams, all drivers don't mind stopping for hours on end, eating trays of fast food at every rest stop waiting for charges, save the world by using no gas and batteries are friendly to everyone, bugs included. Everyone should torch their ICE cars now and buy a Tesla or Bolt post haste.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Or those in the middle: Maybe one of these days, when the charging infrastructure is better, or there are more options that don't cost as much, one will be considered as part of a rational decision based on driving needs, purchasing costs environmental impact, total cost of ownership, and ease of charging.(Source: many on this site who don't jump on TTAC the split second an EV article appears and lives to trash everyone who is a fan of EVs.)
Next