Junkyard Find: 2006 Toyota Camry With Manual Transmission

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

When I walk the rows of a big Ewe Pullet-style self-service car graveyard, I always take a look inside every 2000s Toyota Camry I see. I do this because I wish to document one of the most elusive of all junkyard inmates: One of the final Camrys sold in the United States with a factory-installed manual transmission. Prior to today's Junkyard Find, the newest discarded three-pedal Camry I'd found was a 2001 model in California. We're pushing the record another five years forward today because I've found this five-on-the-floor-equipped 2006 Camry in the very same yard.

Although you can still buy four new car models with five-speed manual transmissions right now, three of the four are miserable little econo-commuters for penny-pinchers and the other exists because some single-digit percentage of Subaru buyers have fond memories of the '91 Loyale. The last model year for a new Camry with a manual— and it was even a six-speed!— in the United States was 2011 (some online sources say it was 2012, but I don't believe them). For you Camry trivia fans, the last year here for a Camry with a manual and a V6 engine was 2001.

The very first Camrys sold on our continent had a five-speed manual (with a really cool-looking accordion-bellows-style shift boot) as base equipment, and the cars so equipped were much cheaper and got significantly better fuel economy than their slushbox-equipped counterparts. Getting an automatic in a new '83 Camry sedan added $709 to the price, which comes to $2,148 in inflation-adjusted 2022 dollars. For the 2006 Camry, a base sedan (so low-prestige that Toyota didn't even give its trim level a name that year) with a stickshift saved the buyer 830 bucks versus the automatic. That's only about $1,240 today, and the five-speed automatic offered one mile per gallon better highway fuel economy.

That tells us that the original buyer of this car probably just preferred driving a manual transmission (we can be fairly certain that this wasn't a fleet car because fleet buyers don't want cars that few drivers are capable of operating) yet wanted a Camry for the usual sensible reasons. Were other similarly priced three-pedal sedans (such as the Accord, Altima, Passat, Sonata, Optima, or Mazda6, all of which were available in 2006 with five- or six-on-the-floor rigs) just too frivolous for this Camry's original purchaser? Feel free to speculate in the comments.

In any case, the plan to drive a bulletproof Toyota sedan (with no torque-converter-equipped Achilles' heel in the drivetrain) for 900,000 miles fell apart when the crash happened. The damage isn't so bad, but it doesn't take much to total a base-grade non-truck that most people can't drive.

And yet someone bought the 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine and the transmission! Sure, that probably happened because it's easier to pull the two as a unit (and the transmission may have been separated and dumped elsewhere in the yard prior to bringing the engine to the cashier's counter), but there's a chance that a junkyard shopper wanted to do a manual swap into another mid-2000s Camry.

It's going to be a challenge to find a newer manual-equipped Camry in a junkyard, because it's difficult enough just finding any Toyotas under 15 years old in a U-Wrench-It. I'll keep trying, of course.

US-market TV commercials for the '06 Camry were on the soporific side.

They weren't much more interesting in Japan.

The Camry replaced the Corona in North America for 1983, and that's enough reason to post this tire-shredding, turbo-howling, Roger Moore-hooning '82 Corona GT Turbo commercial from Japan.


For links to more than 2,300 additional Junkyard Finds, including many Toyotas, please visit The Junkyard Home of the Murilee Martin Lifestyle Brand™.

[Images by the author]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 20 comments
  • Gre65689033 Gre65689033 on Nov 14, 2022

    my 2007 Camry ce made in JAPAN above has never burned or leaked oil thats why I always buy Toyotas made in Japan period

  • Namesakeone Namesakeone on Aug 01, 2023

    Considering the frontal collision wasn't severe enough to set off the airbags, I have a feeling the reason this car is here is at least partially due to low resale value of a manual-equipped anything.

  • JMII I did them on my C7 because somehow GM managed to build LED markers that fail after only 6 years. These are brighter then OEM despite the smoke tint look.I got them here: https://www.corvettepartsandaccessories.com/products/c7-corvette-oracle-concept-sidemarker-set?variant=1401801736202
  • 28-Cars-Later Why RHO? Were Gamma and Epsilon already taken?
  • 28-Cars-Later "The VF 8 has struggled to break ground in the increasingly crowded EV market, as spotty reviews have highlighted deficiencies with its tech, ride quality, and driver assistance features. That said, the price isn’t terrible by current EV standards, starting at $47,200 with leases at $429 monthly." In a not so surprising turn of events, VinFast US has already gone bankrupt.
  • 28-Cars-Later "Farley expressed his belief that Ford would figure things out in the next few years."Ford death watch starts now.
  • JMII My wife's next car will be an EV. As long as it costs under $42k that is totally within our budget. The average cost of a new ICE car is... (checks interwebs) = $47k. So EVs are already in the "affordable" range for today's new car buyers.We already have two other ICE vehicles one of which has a 6.2l V8 with a manual. This way we can have our cake and eat it too. If your a one vehicle household I can see why an EV, no matter the cost, may not work in that situation. But if you have two vehicles one can easily be an EV.My brother has an EV (Tesla Model Y) along with two ICE Porsche's (one is a dedicated track car) and his high school age daughters share an EV (Bolt). I fully assume his daughters will never drive an ICE vehicle. Just like they have never watched anything but HiDef TV, never used a land-line, nor been without an iPad. To them the concept of an ICE power vehicle is complete ridiculous - you mean you have to STOP driving to put some gas in and then PAY for it!!! Why? the car should already charged and the cost is covered by just paying the monthly electric bill.So the way I see it the EV problem will solve itself, once all the boomers die off. Myself as part of Gen X / MTV Generation will have drive a mix of EV and ICE.
Next