Junkyard Find: 2001 Jeep Cherokee Classic 4x4

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

The XJ Cherokee was born out of the French government's bailout of American Motors and made its debut as a 1984 model. It was so successful that it stayed in production in essentially its original form through three corporations and into the following century. Today's Junkyard Find is one of the very last XJ Cherokees ever made, found in a Wyoming car graveyard last week.

Along with the Renault technology that made the design and production of the Alliance, Encore, and Eagle Premier possible, American Motors also got François Castaing, the brilliant Renault engineer who became the mastermind behind the XJ Cherokee.

The result was a unibody truck that weighed 1,200 fewer pounds than its body-on-frame SJ Cherokee predecessor, a hulking military-style brute, while providing nearly as much interior space.

The XJ looked like a tough truck, suitable for hairy-chested outdoorsmen, but it drove more like a car and got impressive gas mileage as part of the bargain. It may not have been quite as good for extreme off-road use as the SJ, but it handled real-world snow and mud competently.

The XJ Cherokee put the hammer down on the truckification of the American road; the 1991 Ford Explorer and 1993 Jeep Grand Cherokee finished the cultural shift that brought us to where we are today.

The Grand Cherokee was supposed to be the XJ Cherokee's replacement, but buyers kept driving XJs out of Jeep showrooms and so Chrysler and, later, DaimlerChrysler kept building them.

2001 was the final model year for the XJ Cherokee in the New World, making this truck of the very last examples sold here. In China, however, XJ production continued all the way through 2014 (and maybe later).

The XJ Cherokee came with an impressive variety of engines during its long production run, including the often-mistaken-for-an- Iron-Duke AMC 2.5-liter four-cylinder, a couple of diesels, and even the 2.8-liter GM 60° V6.

Most XJs got a 4.0-liter version of the good old AMC straight-six, a sturdy pushrod engine dating back to the 1960s, and that's what's in this truck. The rust stains in the engine compartment suggest a catastrophic overheating event, maybe a blown head gasket.

The 4.0 in this truck was rated at 190 horsepower and 225 pound-feet.

Plenty of rear-wheel-drive XJs were sold, but this one has the most common configuration: four-wheel-drive, automatic transmission, 4.0 engine.

The electronic odometer means I couldn't learn the final mileage. I've found some discarded XJs with very high final odometer readings, though most I see traversed between 150,000 and 200,000 miles during their lives.

The body and interior looked pretty decent, even after a life in the rough climates of Colorado and Wyoming. Some costly mechanical failure likely doomed this truck.

There's something of an XJ Cherokee glut in this region, so these trucks aren't worth quite as much here as they would be in the Midwest or West Coast. Still, I'm a bit surprised by the number of nice examples still showing up in Front Range boneyards.

Climbs a 30 percent grade, laughs at an 80 percent chance of snow, gives you 100 percent freedom.

Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 54 comments
  • William Piper William Piper on Aug 22, 2023

    By far the most popular vehicle in my High School’s parking lot, circa 2006. Could really haul a lot of gear.

    • Jeff Jeff on Aug 22, 2023

      I do remember this was a vehicle you literally saw everywhere a few decades ago which is worthy of a Murilee Junkyard Find. I wonder how many of these got traded during Cash For Clunkers. I remember many of the Ford Explorers and older Crown Victorias along with Grand Marquis got traded in during that time.


  • JamesGarfield JamesGarfield on Sep 16, 2023

    Carson D,


    Re Your friend's Cherokee with mysterious engine management issues:


    If still applicable, have him swap out the Crankshaft, Camshaft, and Throttle Body Position Sensors with new good OEM parts (no after-market). AND check the +5v VSen power supply coming out of the ECU, to make sure that supply is clean and stable.


    Had a lot of 'fun' chasing that one down on my own Cherokee.

  • KOKing I owned a Paul Bracq-penned BMW E24 some time ago, and I recently started considering getting Sacco's contemporary, the W124 coupe.
  • Bob The answer is partially that stupid manufacturers stopped producing desirable PHEVs.I bought my older kid a beautiful 2011 Volt, #584 off the assembly line and #000007 for HOV exemption in MD. We love the car. It was clearly an old guy's car, and his kids took away his license.It's a perfect car for a high school kid, really. 35 miles battery range gets her to high school, job, practice, and all her friend's houses with a trickle charge from the 120V outlet. In one year (~7k miles), I have put about 10 gallons of gas in her car, and most of that was for the required VA emissions check minimum engine runtime.But -- most importantly -- that gas tank will let her make the 300-mile trip to college in one shot so that when she is allowed to bring her car on campus, she will actually get there!I'm so impressed with the drivetrain that I have active price alerts for the Cadillac CT6 2.0e PHEV on about 12 different marketplaces to replace my BMW. Would I actually trade in my 3GT for a CT6? Well, it depends on what broke in German that week....
  • ToolGuy Different vehicle of mine: A truck. 'Example' driving pattern: 3/3/4 miles. 9/12/12/9 miles. 1/1/3/3 miles. 5/5 miles. Call that a 'typical' week. Would I ever replace the ICE powertrain in that truck? No, not now. Would I ever convert that truck to EV? Yes, very possibly. Would I ever convert it to a hybrid or PHEV? No, that would be goofy and pointless. 🙂
  • ChristianWimmer Took my ‘89 500SL R129 out for a spin in his honor (not a recent photo).Other great Mercedes’ designers were Friedrich Geiger, who styled the 1930s 500K/540K Roadsters and my favorite S-Class - the W116 - among others. Paul Bracq is also a legend.RIP, Bruno.
  • ToolGuy Currently my drives tend to be either extra short or fairly long. (We'll pick that vehicle over there and figure in the last month, 5 miles round trip 3 times a week, plus 1,000 miles round trip once.) The short trips are torture for the internal combustion powertrain, the long trips are (relative) torture for my wallet. There is no possible way that the math works to justify an 'upgrade' to a more efficient ICE, or an EV, or a hybrid, or a PHEV. Plus my long trips tend to include (very) out of the way places. One day the math will work and the range will work and the infrastructure will work (if the range works) and it will work in favor of a straight EV (purchased used). At that point the short trips won't be torture for the EV components and the long trips shouldn't hurt my wallet. What we will have at that point is the steady drip-drip-drip of long-term battery degradation. (I always pictured myself buying generic modular replacement cells at Harbor Freight or its future equivalent, but who knows if that will be possible). The other option that would almost possibly work math-wise would be to lease a new EV at some future point (but the payment would need to be really right). TL;DR: ICE now, EV later, Hybrid maybe, PHEV probably never.
Next