Border Backups Follow Trump's Closure Threat

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Far away from most American cities, and unbeknownst to most consumers, a transportation bottleneck is stemming the flow of goods from Mexico to the United States.

Major border backups plagued Mexico-U.S. crossings this week, the result of threats made last week by President Donald Trump. While the president eventually backed off after suggesting the U.S. may resort to closing the border in order to stem the flow of migrants into the country, companies didn’t waste time shoehorning as much product into trucks as possible, eager to get their goods across the border.

This, coupled with a mass transfer of U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers from commercial to immigration duties, sent wait times soaring. For automakers (and avocado sellers), this could be a problem.

Speaking to Reuters on Monday, Manuel Sotelo, vice president at the Mexican National Chamber of Freight Transport’s north division, said it was highly unusual to see a half-week’s worth of tractor trailers lining up at the Ciudad Juarez crossing.

On some of those trucks? Auto parts.

“The situation in Ciudad Juarez is very serious because these auto parts go to plants in the United States and obviously they put at risk the operation in the United States,” said Eduardo Solis, president of the Mexican Auto Industry Association.

Wait times at the Ciudad Juarez-El Paso crossing approached 12 hours late last week, Bloomberg reported.

Amid the shutdown talk, many voiced fears that the U.S. auto industry could grind to halt within days if the U.S. were to sever its link to vital components. Air freight, a pricey workaround to ground transport, is already being put to use by some manufacturers.

“The auto sector — and the 10 million jobs it supports — relies upon the North American supply chain and-cross border commerce to remain globally competitive,” said the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers in a statement. “In some instances, auto parts make several border crossings before being integrated into a vehicle’s final assembly.”

At last report, no automakers have seen their operations impacted by the border bottlenecks, but it’s a different story for those who rely on Mexican produce exports.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 34 comments
  • Fordson Fordson on Apr 11, 2019

    Interesting how nobody has made the obvious comparison here - that if your president threatens to close down the border, everyone who needs to get across the border...rushes the border. Just like the people wanting to immigrate here, legally or illegally, or get political sanctuary or asylum, start to hear, beginning in mid-2015 that candidate Trump wants to restrict those possibilities. And now since he's been in office, saying all this stuff, we have a crush of those folks at the border. He frigging created it with his mouth. Those folks see a window of opportunity while the courts hold Trump at bay, and they figure this is their last chance to come to someplace (reasonably) stable. Remember in 2009, when that Kenyan Muslim socialist Obama was comin' tuh take muh gunz? Firearm sales went through the roof! Of course, he wasn't coming to take their guns, but let it go... Now since Trump has been in office, gunmakers domestic, European, some South American and MANY from Israel are in tough economic straits because of a sales slump. I mean, I think a reasonably intelligent herding dog gets this concept; why don't more of us get it?

    • See 1 previous
    • Fordson Fordson on Apr 11, 2019

      @ravenuer C'mon, dude - obviously I mean it ironically.

  • Boy, a whole bunch of you poor babies heads are gonna explode when country hating politicians are indicted and Trump is re-elected.

  • Slavuta CX5 hands down. Only trunk space, where RAV4 is better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Oof 😣 for Tesla.https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-05-03-nhtsa-probes-tesla-recall-over-autopilot-concerns.html
  • Slavuta Autonomous cars can be used by terrorists.
  • W Conrad I'm not afraid of them, but they aren't needed for everyone or everywhere. Long haul and highway driving sure, but in the city, nope.
  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
Next