2023 Mazda CX-50 Review – Playing Dress-Up
2022 Mazda CX-50 2.5 Turbo Premium Plus AWD
Americans have got a fever, and the only prescription is more crossovers. Virtually every automaker trying to do business in this country has some sort of lifted wagon – if not a handful. Large ones, small ones, performance ones, economy ones. No convertible crossovers anymore, thank goodness. They’re shoehorning a crossover into nearly every possible market segment.
Here, we have the 2023 Mazda CX-50, with a name very much like their popular CX-5. And it’s very close in size to said CX-5. Of the six distinct non-electric vehicles offered by Mazda, four are crossovers – but why did they bring us something so very clearly similar to something they’ve been selling well for many years without replacing it?
Oh, and don’t give Mazda any ideas about a Miata crossover, please.
Mazda says the CX-50 was developed – let me get the marketing language right here – “to support the active and outdoor lifestyles of customers…” Images accompanying the press release show the CX-50 in nature – on groomed trails and adjacent to trees. Yeah, I know my photos have the car posed on a gravel lot near a river, too.
As such, the CX-50 sports additional black plastic lower body cladding. The styling beyond the plastic is distinct, too – with a bit more ground clearance and a lower roofline than the CX-5 – making the entire car look longer. I won’t deny that it’s a handsome look, especially with the wheel wells filled up with the twenty-inch wheels fitted to this Premium Plus trim.
But I’m not sure it necessarily speaks to a rugged outdoor active lifestyle. Beyond the standard all-wheel drive and the selectable drive mode with an off-road mode, I don’t see a single thing on this car that makes it any more capable where the pavement ends than your typical crossover. No skid plates, no all-terrain tires, no locking differentials.
Will the CX-50 buyer care about this? I’m not sure that they will. Because once they get behind the wheel, they’ll find a comfortable, roomy, and above all luxurious family hauler. The ride quality is superb, with minimal wind and road noise and no harshness transmitted to the cabin from impacting expansion joints. The panoramic moonroof does bring nature in just a bit should you choose.
The turbocharged engine has plenty of power to get up to speed without drama, and while the six-speed automatic is down a few cogs from some competitors, it shifts smoothly and feels very well matched to both the engine and the nature of the CX-50. The driving experience is basically identical to that of the CX-5 – which is to say, pleasant.
Infotainment is getting better from Mazda, with a display that is clearer and more snappy to respond than in years past. But it’s still commanded by a central dial near the shifter, with a couple of buttons to toggle for music or nav. Wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay are welcome additions.
Let’s consider, then, what should be the best comparison in the entry-luxury compact crossover market – the Lexus NX. Tim took a look at the NX 350 last week. Dimensionally, both the NX and this CX-50 are quite close inside and out – the Mazda has a slightly longer wheelbase (110.8 inches versus 105.9 for the Lexus) within roughly the same length (185.5 inches for Mazda, 183.5 inches on the Lexus). Cargo space is a win for the Mazda as well – 31.4 cubic feet behind the rear seats, versus 22.7 cubes on the Lexus.
And yet picking the entry trim of the NX 250 and simply adding all-wheel drive will run $41,025 delivered – without a number of features (like heated/ventilated seats, the moonroof, and leather) the Mazda gives on this $43,170 Turbo Premium Plus package. Matching the two up shows the value here, and the quality of the materials and appointments within the Mazda (caveat for the infotainment here) are at least every bit the equal of the Lexus.
Mazda is a luxury brand now. This is not my father’s Mazda of the GLC era, lined as it was with repurposed mouse fur. I’m sure Toyota isn’t thrilled that they’re helping to build (at the Alabama joint venture facility) such a vehicle that might make cross-shop their own premium line, but that’s how great a job Mazda has done here.
To be fair, no amount of black plastic cladding can ever make this an off-roader – not with the snazzy twenty-inch wheels and low-profile tires fitted here. That’s ok – the slight nod toward off-road fashion is like that one nice pair of running shoes I once bought, thinking I might get off the couch and start running to lose some weight. Nope. They’ve been relegated to very comfy lawn-mowing sneakers – and at least until they turned green, they looked good doing so.
With the 2023 CX-50, Mazda is leaning in hard to court those who imagine themselves with an active and outdoor lifestyle. Whether it succeeds is a question yet to be answered.
[Images: © 2022 Chris Tonn]
Some enthusiasts say they were born with gasoline in their veins. Chris Tonn, on the other hand, had rust flakes in his eyes nearly since birth. Living in salty Ohio and being hopelessly addicted to vintage British and Japanese steel will do that to you. His work has appeared in eBay Motors, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars, Reader's Digest, AutoGuide, Family Handyman, and Jalopnik. He is a member of the Midwest Automotive Media Association, and he's currently looking for the safety glasses he just set down somewhere.
More by Chris Tonn
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Tassos On the SERIOUS Side: A Reliable ROlls ROyce never imported in the US was the V12 CENTURY. Now you can import 25+ year olds, which may be OK for Tim but NOT for us who need an UP TO DATE vehicle. The Century was a top exec car with a SUMPTUOUS interior, far superior even to the Lexus LS. UNfortunately, the latest century model is a Rolls Royce CULLINAN CLONE SUV, which I would not be dead driving. I suggest Toyota EXPLOIT their experience with the Century and produce a FLAGSHIP SEDAN that will be EQUAL to RR in luxury AND far better in RELIABILITY and at half the price of buying AND 10% of the cost of OWNING due to much less repairs. I am SURE the market is so small in this segment, that they will NOT do it, and deprive us of this LEGENDARY Vehicle in the Future As well.
- Lou_BC I pulled over into a road side rest stop once because the rain got so bad that I could barely see. Several other vehicles followed. As I sat there in my F150 watching, a Corvette wailed by. How could they not feel the vehicle hydroplaning? The steering on my heavy truck with excellent tires felt numb.
- Lou_BC Maloo GTSR W1
- MaintenanceCosts E34 M5 3.8. Not sure there has ever been a more charismatic engine than the S38B38.
- 28-Cars-Later Sadly, fewer motorists bothering to buy insurance [because they are unwanted illegal aliens] will likewise be used as an excuse to raise rates on those that do.
Comments
Join the conversation
Ride quality may be related to the tires. Those 20" need a low-profile to fit. I suspect that the standard 17" tires provide a noticeably nicer ride. Too bad those cars are flogged to the reviewers by the Mazda PR people.
Hasn't anybody else noticed that the lowered roofline results in tiny side windows? They're only about one-and-a-half Big Gulps tall. When I'm out having motoring adventures in outdoorsy settings, I like to be able to see the scenery.