Why Are Traffic Deaths Increasing While People Are Driving Less?
The latest data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is confirming what local agencies have already been suggesting. Last year represented another sizable increase in U.S. roadway fatalities, pitching up by 10.5 percent over the elevated death rate witnessed in 2020. The agency has estimated that 42,915 people were killed in 2021, whereas 2020 resulted in 38,824 fatalities — a 7.1-percent increase over the declines seen in 2019. While the current situation is not nearly as bad as the rates witnessed during the 1970s, this still represents the highest per capita fatalities in sixteen years and everyone is trying to get a handle on why.
Traffic deaths have been on the rise since the start of the pandemic, confusing everyone who counts crashes because the supporting data also shows that there was a lot less driving being done during the period. Historically, years where people are disinclined from hitting the road due to a beleaguered economy tend to represent far fewer traffic-related fatalities. We can see this happening in 1942 when the U.S. braced itself to enter World War II by rationing everything from fuel to rubber. Another glaring example takes place in 1932, as the nation reached the darkest point in the Great Depression. In fact, there are very few examples of per capita improvements in on-road deaths from the pre-war period, and those that do exist coincide directly with economic recession.
The examples become a little less glaring after 1942. But those with enough time on their hands will undoubtedly notice that traffic accidents tend to decline whenever the United States goes through a period of financial hardship. Correlation is not causation. But you can compare every recession that’s on the books against government driving data dating back to 1900 to draw your own conclusions. Though mine would still be that there are simply fewer opportunities for mayhem when the average person is suddenly spending less time behind the wheel.
This places the supposition at odds with our present reality, however. If roadway accidents really do decline whenever Americans have to tighten their belts and keep their vehicles parked at home, why have the last two years shown such a sizable increase in deaths?
The Governors Highway Safety Association (GHSA) has suggested that a combination of increases in speeding, distracted driving, driving under the influence, and “roads designed for speed instead of safety” has sent the United States down the wrong path — allegedly undoing decades of progress. Though the group may not be the one offering solutions everyone likes, as it has been pushing algorithmic software that uses enhanced traffic and in-car cameras to constantly track the behavior and location of individual drivers. Based on initiatives already planned in the European Union, the system also monitors vehicle status and would “ideally” offer the ability to send a live feed of a car’s interior to local law enforcement whenever the algorithm is tripped by a series of undesirable actions. Police would then be able to remotely disable the automobile and have their way with the occupants.
Love or hate the GHSA’s long-term vision, there’s certainly a case to be made regarding distracted driving. Despite everyone thinking cell phones would result in annual spikes in traffic accidents, the fatality rate remained relatively stable as they were ushered into the mainstream. But automakers may have opened Pandora’s box by introducing large touchscreens at the expense of easier-to-use knobs, buttons, and switches. Drivers are now required to interact with visual displays and are difficult to operate using muscle memory alone.
Drug and alcohol use is also unquestionably on the rise since 2010 and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has reported borderline horrifying increases in the frequency of fatal overdoses since the pandemic began. Early data from the CDC has suggested that nearly 108,000 Americans died from drug overdoses in 2021 alone. With that total in mind, it’s easy to assume that a larger number of people climbed behind the wheel while inebriated than in years past.
Speeding is the one factor that’s a little harder to pin down. While there were numerous reports that speeding got out of hand at the start of 2020, attributed to empty roads created by the pandemic, hard data was limited to local law enforcement. This created a patchwork of limited information with the assumption that it had become a nationwide problem. But subsequent reporting has suggested it was a temporary issue. That’s not to suggest that speed wouldn’t play a factor in the death toll, just that the resulting data has been less consistent and harder to prove has become a problem for the whole country. Speeding undoubtedly went up in the spring and summer of 2020, we just don’t know if it continued into 2021.
Regardless of the cause, U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg said America faces a crisis on its roads that must be addressed. The Department of Transportation is focusing on an alleged decline in seatbelt use, the aforementioned speeding claims, and the assumption that more people went on out-of-state road trips as the pandemic waned. While possible, the latter issue doesn’t make much sense if you take into account that 2020 also represented as sizable an increase in traffic fatalities. Either way, the Biden administration has pledged $5 billion to cities interested in using the funds to slow down cars under the Safe Streets & Roads for All program.
While technically an automotive safety initiative, the funds have been earmarked primarily for things like adding bike lanes, widening sidewalks, and attempting to convince car-owning commuters to switch to public transit. Having more walkable cities isn’t a terrible idea (unless it makes driving a nightmare) and may even improve pedestrian safety. But something tells me there’s more at play here than people lacking sufficient alternatives to the automobile in urban environments. The last two years showed marked increases in vehicular-related deaths and the fact that they coincide with a period where people were undoubtedly driving less could suggest there’s a very serious problem.
Have driving assistance packages dulled people’s skills to a point where they’re now worse drivers? Has the drug epidemic played a role? Did the influx of oversized touchscreens make it impossible for people to keep their eyes on the road? Is this the result of the United States’ population (and average driver) becoming older? Or has the average motorist really turned into a lead-footed maniac with little care for the wellbeing of others by the daily stress of being alive?
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- Bd2 Other way around.Giorgetto Giugiaro penned the Pony Coupe during the early 1970s and later used its wedge shape as the basis for the M1 and then the DMC-12.The 3G Supra was just one of many Japanese coupes to adopt the wedge shape (actually was one of the later ones).The Mitsubishi Starion, Nissan 300ZX, etc.
- Tassos I also want one of the idiots who support the ban to explain to me how it will work.Suppose sometime (2035 or later) you cannot buy a new ICE vehicle in the UK.Q1: Will this lead to a ICE fleet resembling that of CUBA, with 100 year old '56 Chevys eventually? (in that case, just calculate the horrible extra pollution due to keeping 100 year old cars on the road)Q2: Will people be able to buy PARTS for their old cars FOREVER?Q3: Will people be allowed to jump across the Channel and buy a nice ICE in France, Germany (who makes the best cars anyway), or any place else that still sells them, and then use it in the UK?
- Tassos Bans are ridiculous and undemocratic and smell of Middle Ages and the Inquisition. Even 2035 is hardly any better than 2030.The ALMIGHTY CONSUMER should decide, not... CARB, preferably WITHOUT the Government messing with the playing field.And if the usual clueless idiots read this and offer the tired "But Government subsidizes the oil industry too", will they EVER learn that those MINISCULE (compared to the TRILLIONS of $ size of this industry) subsidies were designed to help the SMALL Oil producers defend themselves against the "Big Oil" multinationals. Ask ANY major Oil co CEO and he will gladly tell you that you can take those tiny subsidies and shove them.
- Dusterdude The suppliers can ask for concessions, but I wouldn’t hold my breath . With the UAW they are ultimately bound to negotiate with them. However, with suppliers , they could always find another supplier ( which in some cases would be difficult, but not impossible)
- AMcA Phoenix. Awful. The roads are huge and wide, with dedicated lanes for turning, always. Requires no attention to what you're doing. The roads are idiot proofed, so all the idiots drive - they have no choice, because everything is so spread out.