2022 Nissan Kicks Review – Stays In Its Lane

Chris Tonn
by Chris Tonn
Fast Facts

2022 Nissan Kicks SR

1.6-liter twincam four (122 hp @ 6,300 rpm, 114 lb-ft @ 4,000 rpm)
Continuously-variable transmission, front-wheel drive
31 city / 36 highway / 33 combined (EPA Rating, MPG)
7.7 city / 6.6 highway / 7.2 combined. (NRCan Rating, L/100km)
Base Price: $23,415 US / $27,558 CAN
As Tested: $25,930 US / $30,123 CAN
Prices include $1175 destination charge in the United States and $2060 for freight, PDI, and A/C tax in Canada and, because of cross-border equipment differences, can't be directly compared.

Lawyers are the fun police, aren’t they? Always getting in the way of you doing something interesting and/or stupid, right? Every week when I get a new vehicle to test, it’s prefaced by a few pages of legalese to be electronically signed, with a number of restrictions and prohibitions on what you can and cannot do with the vehicle.

Upon scheduling the delivery of this 2022 Nissan Kicks, I spoke with a Nissan representative, thinking I might be able to weasel my way past one of those lawyerly lines keeping my teenage daughter, turning 16 the day the Kicks arrived, from driving the smallest Nissan. No dice, I’m afraid, so I had to put myself (figuratively, of course) into her shoes, imagining what the Kicks might be like for a new driver.

The dad within me takes a quick look at the spec sheet and likes what he sees – the driving enthusiast, not so much. The 122 horsepower four-cylinder driving the front wheels seems sufficient – though when hauling four people that can add a good bit to the curb weight of a bit under 2,800 pounds, the acceleration is best described as deliberate. The traditional Nissan CVT transmission is rather unobtrusive in this application – in other cars, the engine noise gets thrashy as the CVT winds up and down the ratio spread, but here it’s more than tolerable.

Handling is similarly unremarkable – this is no sporty little hot-hatch, and that’s fine. The short wheelbase does lead to a slightly choppy ride if the interstate is cursed with lots of expansion joints, but the Kicks is no worse than any other car or small crossover in this price range. A teen headed to and from school and extracurriculars won’t complain – the drive to and from college with a hatch full of dirty laundry should be fine, too.

Passenger comfort is where the Kicks shines. The front and rear leg and headroom are stellar, and the front seats are as comfy as the rest of Nissan’s lineup. With the rear seats folded, there’s room for 53.0 cubic feet of dirty laundry, for trips to IKEA to outfit the first apartment, or to sneak in that new puppy that you don’t want the landlord to know about.

Infotainment controls work well – the optional eight-inch touchscreen responds quickly to inputs, with knobs for volume and tuning. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across the board. HVAC controls are right below the screen, and similarly work well – nothing is confusing or likely to distract the new driver. Audio quality is good – though road noise does come through the cabin at times.

The Kicks does have an interesting optional Bose Personal Plus sound system – it places speakers in the driver’s headrest to help direct the sound at the person most using the car. Reminds me of the headrest speaker setup in my thirty-plus-year-old Miata – in both cases, placing speakers right by the ears does make a difference in overcoming road noise.

Look, I’m not going to tell you that the Nissan Kicks is the greatest car in the world. It’s kinda slow, not super roomy, and is definitely built to a price. But for the right buyer – especially one shopping at the entry price of right around $20k – it makes a lot of sense.

[Exterior images: © 2022 Chris Tonn, interior images courtesy Nissan]

Chris Tonn
Chris Tonn

Some enthusiasts say they were born with gasoline in their veins. Chris Tonn, on the other hand, had rust flakes in his eyes nearly since birth. Living in salty Ohio and being hopelessly addicted to vintage British and Japanese steel will do that to you. His work has appeared in eBay Motors, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars, Reader's Digest, AutoGuide, Family Handyman, and Jalopnik. He is a member of the Midwest Automotive Media Association, and he's currently looking for the safety glasses he just set down somewhere.

More by Chris Tonn

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 14 comments
  • Arthur Dailey Arthur Dailey on May 24, 2022

    I have become a firm believer in CUVs/SUVs as sedans and coupes have reduced their greenhouses, lowered their rooflines and provide minimal road clearance. Not sure whether they did this to improve mileage or in the name of 'style'. I have given up on trying to get an infant seat into or out of a sedan. Or getting my mother into one. Or trying to drive one on the highway in the rain or sleet or slush as full size pick-ups and tractor-trailers cover my windshield, hood and roof with spray. And in deep snow the front 'air dam' builds up snow like a small plow. The low profile tires/tyres do not help either. In the big storm this year, I saw sedans/coupes with their tires lifted right off the ground as the snow built up underneath them. Long live SUVs/CUVs!

  • AK AK on May 27, 2022

    I'm surprisingly not offended by the design of these.

  • Redapple2 jeffbut they dont want to ... their pick up is 4th behind ford/ram, Toyota. GM has the Best engineers in the world. More truck profit than the other 3. Silverado + Sierra+ Tahoe + Yukon sales = 2x ford total @ $15,000 profit per. Tons o $ to invest in the BEST truck. No. They make crap. Garbage. Evil gm Vampire
  • Rishabh Ive actually seen the one unit you mentioned, driving around in gurugram once. And thats why i got curious to know more about how many they sold. Seems like i saw the only one!
  • Amy I owned this exact car from 16 until 19 (1990 to 1993) I miss this car immensely and am on the search to own it again, although it looks like my search may be in vane. It was affectionatly dubbed, " The Dragon Wagon," and hauled many a teenager around the city of Charlotte, NC. For me, it was dependable and trustworthy. I was able to do much of the maintenance myself until I was struck by lightning and a month later the battery exploded. My parents did have the entire electrical system redone and he was back to new. I hope to find one in the near future and make it my every day driver. I'm a dreamer.
  • Jeff Overall I prefer the 59 GM cars to the 58s because of less chrome but I have a new appreciation of the 58 Cadillac Eldorados after reading this series. I use to not like the 58 Eldorados but I now don't mind them. Overall I prefer the 55-57s GMs over most of the 58-60s GMs. For the most part I like the 61 GMs. Chryslers I like the 57 and 58s. Fords I liked the 55 thru 57s but the 58s and 59s not as much with the exception of Mercury which I for the most part like all those. As the 60s progressed the tail fins started to go away and the amount of chrome was reduced. More understated.
  • Theflyersfan Nissan could have the best auto lineup of any carmaker (they don't), but until they improve one major issue, the best cars out there won't matter. That is the dealership experience. Year after year in multiple customer service surveys from groups like JD Power and CR, Nissan frequency scrapes the bottom. Personally, I really like the never seen new Z, but after having several truly awful Nissan dealer experiences, my shadow will never darken a Nissan showroom. I'm painting with broad strokes here, but maybe it is so ingrained in their culture to try to take advantage of people who might not be savvy enough in the buying experience that they by default treat everyone like idiots and saps. All of this has to be frustrating to Nissan HQ as they are improving their lineup but their dealers drag them down.
Next