GM Signs Agreement to Build Battery Processing Facility

by Matthew Guy

Published: December 2nd, 2021

gm signs agreement to build battery processing facility

The all-electric roadmap at General Motors continues apace. This week, the company announced plans to form a joint venture with a group called POSCO Chemical, an outfit that has nothing to do with our News & Social Media Contributor despite sharing a curiously similar surname.

GM’s plan calls for the parties to construct a facility in North America which will process critical battery materials for The General’s new Ultium electric vehicle platform. Note well: these are the gubbins planned to be used in upcoming rigs like the Lyriq and Hummer EV, not the maligned Bolt EV.

The joint venture will process something called a Cathode Active Material (CAM), which is apparently a key battery material representing about 40 percent of the cost of a battery cell. The new effort will supply the Ultium Cells facilities being built in the Lordstown and Springhill areas by GM and LG, making this new factory akin to a transmission plant that assembles gearboxes for installation in cars at another facility. Actually, it’s even a bit more basic than that; think of this new place as a factory that manufacturers torque converters which are sent to the transmission plant then on to final assembly.

“Our work with POSCO Chemical is a key part of our strategy to rapidly scale U.S. EV production and drive innovation in battery performance, quality and cost,” said Doug Parks, GM executive vice president, Global Product Development, Purchasing and Supply Chain. “We are building a sustainable and resilient North America-focused supply chain for EVs covering the entire ecosystem from raw materials to battery cell manufacturing and recycling.”

That’s an awful lot of marketing chaff, but the man has a point. It is advantageous for a car company to own as much of the supply chain as possible, placing their futures in their own control rather than in the hands of other facilities. This challenge has been brought into clear view over the last year or so by the ongoing semiconductor shortage. Still, it doesn’t always work out; look at when Henry Ford tried to run a Brazilian rubber plantation in the ‘20s so he could own the production of tires.

It’s worth noting that these plans are described as a “non-binding term sheet” with the execution of definitive agreements expected sooner rather than later. That convenient title is a great way to announce big plans yet shield oneself should the situation turn turtle at some point down the road before the project really gets going. For its part, GM has expressed a goal to launch more than 30 EVs globally by 2025, with more than two-thirds of them available here in the United States. They also want to earn U.S. market share leadership in EVs, something which will surely escape them if they continue to recall every example of a particular electric vehicle they’ve produced to date.

[Image: GM]

#All-electric #Battery #ElectricVehicle #EV #GeneralMotors #GM #Production #Ultium

Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments

Join the conversation

3 of 23 comments

Nicolebotello on Dec 03, 2021

Before our eyes, the electric transport revolution is taking place - the battery is replacing the internal combustion engine. The first to use them were mopeds, then public transport was replenished with electric buses, hybrid cars are becoming widespread. Every day the number of batteries hazardous to nature will grow, and in a few years they will end their service life.

Like Reply
Schmitt trigger on Dec 03, 2021

RE: all lowercase corporate logos. Back when Motorola was king of the hill, its semiconductor division had the world’s most diverse semiconductor portfolio. Motorola eventually shed its semiconductor business into ONSemi, which for a while continued being a powerful player. But like a tree in autumn, ONSemi has been shedding product lines wholesale. In the latest shedding, which was significant, ONSemi also gratuitously decided to change the logo to onsemi. So gm is not the first company who attempts lowercasing their logo to greatness.

Like Reply
- Inside Looking Out on Dec 03, 2021
  
  I remember those times. I used to program Motorola processors from 6800 to PowerPC and then all that disappeared, Intel won. Same happened with HP logic analyzers - they become Agilent. Now I use Chinese oscilloscopes.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Thankfully I don't have to deal with GDI issues in my Frontier. These cleaners should do well for me if I win.
Theflyersfan Serious answer time...Honda used to stand for excellence in auto engineering. Their first main claim to fame was the CVCC (we don't need a catalytic converter!) engine and it sent from there. Their suspensions, their VTEC engines, slick manual transmissions, even a stowing minivan seat, all theirs. But I think they've been coasting a bit lately. Yes, the Civic Type-R has a powerful small engine, but the Honda of old would have found a way to get more revs out of it and make it feel like an i-VTEC engine of old instead of any old turbo engine that can be found in a multitude of performance small cars. Their 1.5L turbo-4...well...have they ever figured out the oil dilution problems? Very un-Honda-like. Paint issues that still linger. Cheaper feeling interior trim. All things that fly in the face of what Honda once was. The only thing that they seem to have kept have been the sales staff that treat you with utter contempt for daring to walk into their inner sanctum and wanting a deal on something that isn't a bare-bones CR-V. So Honda, beat the rest of your Japanese and Korean rivals, and plug-in hybridize everything. If you want a relatively (in an engineering way) easy way to get ahead of the curve, raise the CAFE score, and have a major point to advertise, and be able to sell to those who can't plug in easily, sell them on something that will get, for example, 35% better mileage, plug in when you get a chance, and drives like a Honda. Bring back some of the engineering skills that Honda once stood for. And then start introducing a portfolio of EVs once people are more comfortable with the idea of plugging in. People seeing that they can easily use an EV for their daily errands with the gas engine never starting will eventually sell them on a future EV because that range anxiety will be lessened. The all EV leap is still a bridge too far, especially as recent sales numbers have shown. Baby steps. That's how you win people over.
Theflyersfan If this saves (or delays) an expensive carbon brushing off of the valves down the road, I'll take a case. I understand that can be a very expensive bit of scheduled maintenance.
Zipper69 A Mini should have 2 doors and 4 cylinders and tires the size of dinner plates.All else is puffery.
Theflyersfan Just in time for the weekend!!! Usual suspects A: All EVs are evil golf carts, spewing nothing but virtue signaling about saving the earth, all the while hacking the limbs off of small kids in Africa, money losing pits of despair that no buyer would ever need and anyone that buys one is a raging moron with no brains and the automakers who make them want to go bankrupt.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Usual suspects B: All EVs are powered by unicorns and lollypops with no pollution, drive like dreams, all drivers don't mind stopping for hours on end, eating trays of fast food at every rest stop waiting for charges, save the world by using no gas and batteries are friendly to everyone, bugs included. Everyone should torch their ICE cars now and buy a Tesla or Bolt post haste.(Source: all of the comments on every EV article here posted over the years)Or those in the middle: Maybe one of these days, when the charging infrastructure is better, or there are more options that don't cost as much, one will be considered as part of a rational decision based on driving needs, purchasing costs environmental impact, total cost of ownership, and ease of charging.(Source: many on this site who don't jump on TTAC the split second an EV article appears and lives to trash everyone who is a fan of EVs.)