Housekeeping: There Are Gonna Be Some Changes Around Here

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

Hi there. Your friendly Managing Editor here. I am checking in with you out there in B and B land to give you a quick update on what’s going on over here on this side of the computer/phone/tablet screen, over here in TTAC country.

We’re about to make a change to how we operate this site. Since before I was hired here, we’ve been chasing the news cycle along with our competition, putting out 8-10 posts per day pre COVID, and around 5 per day in recent months, thanks mostly to the pandemic causing the rush of industry news to slow from a gush to a trickle.

Well, my bosses and I have decided to focus less on the news and more on TTAC’s take on it. Even if that means fewer posts overall.

I’ll spare you the business reasons, other than to say we believe this change will be beneficial to the site and the company that owns it.

The editorial reason is simple: TTAC exists not to simply tell you the news about the automotive industry, but to drive the conversation about said news. We are here to cut through the spin and the B.S. and tell you truths that other sites skim over or ignore for whatever reason.

I’m biased, but I think we’ve mostly done a good job of that in my time here, the occasional misstep aside. But we can always do more. We already editorialize, analyze, and opine, but there’s room for more of that — and, we think, an appetite from you guys for more of it.

So that means flipping the mix. Right now, the site is 65-80 percent news, depending on the day, with the rest being reviews, features, and op-eds. We’re going to cut back on the news, especially straight news, and increase the percentage of the articles that drive conversation based on the news.

We simply think we add more value to the discourse by going more in-depth on topics than if we are just re-blogging what Automotive News already wrote.

That said, we will still run some stories that re-blog news broke by others, with or without our own take. Just less often.

Again, to be crystal clear, this doesn’t mean we don’t do any news, or that we won’t do straight “just the facts” news. Of course not. There will still be important news stories that we’d be remiss to skip, and sometimes we’ll have an opinion or analysis attached, and sometimes we’ll play it straight. As we’ve always done. But you will see fewer stories about small changes in some OEM’s C-suite or small recalls that have little to do with safety. The number won’t be zero, but it will be less than it has been.

We’ll still have news-heavy coverage of major events that break news, such as auto shows, of course.

This change does mean that depending on the day, you will likely see fewer posts — but the posts you do see will be longer, more deeply researched, and perhaps contain more original reporting.

What does this mean for your favorite features? Very little. Rare Rides, B/D/B, car reviews, junkyard finds, and most of the rest aren’t going anywhere. The timing of publication may change a bit, and mild format tweaks are always possible, but otherwise, they will continue to be part of TTAC. Except for Ace of Base, which became a COVID-related casualty thanks to the dearth of new-car launches in 2020. Mr. Guy and I are already brainstorming how to replace it.

You may also see some new bylines on the site, including some that you haven’t seen on these digital pages in years. You’ll also continue to see the same masthead you see now, except for Jason — he has left us to pursue other opportunities and we wish him well.

(For those wondering about Bark, Ronnie, and Bozi, they remain on the roster, but are all busy with other projects at the moment.)

You might even see your own bylines here. That’s right: As part of this shift, I am putting out a call for pitches. If you have ideas for stories about the industry that you think fit TTAC’s style and mission, feel free to reach out. I can’t promise I’ll reply to everyone, but if I like it, I’ll be in touch.

That’s on a freelance basis, to be clear — we are not looking to hire a new newsbot/news contributor at this time.

One last thing: The current commenting policies and moderation operations remain in place, unchanged.

That, as they say, is that. If you have questions or feedback, sound off below.

[Image: Sorn340 Studio Images/Shutterstock.com]

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 50 comments
  • JaVeyron JaVeyron on Jun 05, 2021

    I’m honestly excited to hear that a business case can be made for quality, unique writing, which goes against the trend of content mill clickbaity crap. This is the perfect place for deep dives, inside baseball, and cutting through marketing spin, since it would fit TTAC’s brand and differentiate it from other sites. Looking forward to read the new stuff!

  • Speedlaw Speedlaw on Jun 09, 2021

    more moderation of political rants please. I already have twitter for the Two Minutes' Hate.

  • Tassos Ask me if I care for the idiotic vehicles less than 10% of whose owners use as INTENDED.
  • Brandon The 2024 Mercedes-Benz E 350 4Matic looks like a compelling addition to the luxury sedan market. From the drive notes, it’s clear that Mercedes-Benz has maintained its commitment to blending performance with comfort. The handling and acceleration seem impressive, reflecting Mercedes’ signature blend of power and smoothness.
  • Jmanb52 In this case clearly a driver responsbile for the accident. Lawyer just trying to add confusion to jude and or jury to think about it. I was on a jury once for an auto accident and one of the attorneys tried a few stunts to shift blame. Same thing is happening here. The companies pushing autonamous want to deal with fleet markets like the autonamous taxi companies rather than individual consumers. In my opinion I think they belvie that would be more predictable sales. Car gets to xyz milage time to replace. In my opinion they could never sell a full autonamous car to an individual because of a back and forth legal battles between owner and maker when there is a crash. They need to foget about all these take over driver aids. It is just causing more issues than it could prevent.
  • Jmanb52 Short answer is NO! It has been a tread for manufactures to basicaly glue a tablet to an area of the dash and call it an infotament system. However there is not one of us on here that doesn't ahve a smart phone or tablet. With the android auto, and the Apple Carplay and bluetooth that conencts car spekers and mic to our headset, do we even need an Infotament system or just bluetooth connection to use hands free mic and spearkers or wired connection to USB port for connection to spearkers / mic and charge the phone. So maybe the QOTD should be do manufactures even need to provide an infotanement system or should they just provide an in dash holder for a tablet or smartphone?
  • Jmanb52 In the past year I did some more research on EVs. I already knew for years they were heavier than a ICE car of the same model / class. Like the F150 lightning can be 1000 LBS heavier than its ICE counterpart. In the last year I read more on the size of breaks, tires and other items that take more resrouces to create and polute more in their wear. This was another nail in my corporate EV caufin. I already didn't have much care for them due to my height (over 6 feet) and they all have a bad desgin, over dependency on gimics, over computerized driving experience. If I ever did get one it would be a low range in town only type vehicle that I would convert an older car. There is no manufacture making EVs that is worth a penny of my money.
Next