Ford CEO Already Sees Maverick as Successful, Suggests Variants
Ford CEO Jim Farley was interviewed in a New York Times article apparently devoted to praising him and the company. It was reminiscent of those segments on Good Morning America where they have healthy cooking tips sponsored by the American Egg Board and — surprise, surprise — end up recommending people incorporate eggs into meals.
But it wasn’t entirely devoid of substance, either. While pretending that Farley had just taken the job and was somehow solely responsible for a gaggle of successful debuts planned ages before he took over, NYT did mange to convince him to open up about the future of the Maverick pickup and its potential family.
The CEO said he already sees the compact truck as a winner for the brand and with good reason. Despite going against the grain of presumed American tastes, the Maverick has garnered a truly impressive amount of attention over the last week. Part of that was due to Ford’s marketing efforts. Rather than trying to target the traditional truck buyer, the manufacturer is pinging urbanites who might want to a vehicle that can handle more-modest chores and remains incredibly fuel efficient.
Larger pickups can handle things like carrying a motorcycle or heading to the store to pick up the necessities for some d0-it-yourself work. But the Maverick is supposed to excel at those tasks — leaving the truly heavy lifting to its bigger brothers yielding steeper price tags and larger motors.
“This is the product for people who never thought they wanted a truck,” Farley explained.From NYT:
Ford, known for its brawny engines, made the Maverick’s base model a hybrid that goes 40 mile [sic] on a gallon of gas. The truck starts at $19,995, or nearly $10,000 less than the cheapest F-150. Hyundai is introducing a similar truck called the Santa Cruz this summer but has not said how much it will cost.
Sam Abuelsamid, an analyst at Guidehouse, noted that compact pickup trucks had not been very successful and that most automakers had done away with them. But over the last 10 years, American tastes have gravitated toward trucks and S.U.V.s, so Ford may be smart to try again. “You have a lot of people who’ve concluded a pickup fits their lifestyle now, so this is going to be interesting to watch,” he said.
Mr. Farley expressed confidence that the Maverick would be a hit, saying he could envision Ford producing a family of Maverick variants, including an electric model.
The electric model might be a stretch but the public interest is undeniable — at least anecdotally. Numerous people have reached out to me from out of the blue to ask me about the Maverick and if they thought it would suit their needs. The more Ford can tailor the model for individual tastes, the better it’s likely to perform in terms of sales.
While I’m not enthralled with some of the packaging decisions Ford has made and wish the bed were a wee-bit longer, it would be an untruth to suggest I wasn’t similarly interested in the compact truck. I also happen to fall precisely into the automaker’s assumed demographic of people that never thought they wanted to own a pickup. As a lifelong advocate for oversized sedans and squirrely hatchbacks, I always imagined I would purchase another van (my third automotive fetish) for lugging around motorbikes and plywood. But the Maverick is looking so cheap and potentially versatile that I’m finding myself thinking again.
“The electrification of the industry is a big change, and I think it wasn’t clear until we launched Lightning and Mach E that Ford was going to be a winner in this new electric reality,” Farley said in response to the automaker’s evolving lineup. “Now investors are betting on Ford, and what they’re telling me is, ‘The strategy is attractive, Go execute it, Farley.'”
Offering good products that resonate with consumers is always a sound strategy. If Farley can keep that in the front of his mind, perhaps he’ll be a great CEO after all.
[Images: Ford Motor Co.]
A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.
More by Matt Posky
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Daniel J I had read an article several years ago that one of the issues that workers were complaining about with this plant is that 1/3 of the workforce were temporary workers. They didn't have the same benefits as the other 2/3 of the employees. Will this improve this situation or make it worse? Do temporary workers get a vote?I honestly don't care as long as it is not a requirement to work at the plant.
- Kosmo Tragic. Where in the name of all that is holy did anybody get the idea that self-driving cars were a good idea? I get the desire for lane-keeping, and use it myself, occasionally, but I don't even like to look across the car at my passenger while driving, let along relinquish complete control.
- Bof65705611 There’s one of these around the corner from me. It still runs…driven daily, in fact. That fact always surprises me.
- Master Baiter I'm skeptical of any project with government strings attached. I've read that the new CHIPS act which is supposed to bring semiconductor manufacturing back to the U.S. is so loaded with DEI requirements that companies would rather not even bother trying to set up shop here. Cheaper to keep buying from TSMC.
- CanadaCraig VOTE NO VW!
Comments
Join the conversation
I would go for the XL base with the hybrid. With an AWD CRV I don't need another AWD especially with front wheel drive. There is enough electrical nannies that I wouldn't want to add anymore even though I would like cruise control it would not be worth it to add an extra package of things I don't want or need. I like the cactus gray color but I would take white. The hybrid for me is a game changer with 40 mpgs which would tilt this truck as a choice for me over the Santa Cruz even though I like the Santa Cruz a lot. If the Maverick had the turbo 3 as a base then I would not be that interested in it. Very glad to see the hybrid power as standard which is a selling point over the competition.
One quick note I haven't seen mentioned - the Mav hybrid requires premium fuel. Scroll all the way to the bottom: https://media.ford.com/content/fordmedia/fna/us/en/news/2021/06/08/all-new-ford-maverick.html