Tesla Self-Driving and Unintended Acceleration Not The Same Says NHTSA

by Jason R. Sakurai

January 8th, 2021 3:51 PM

tesla self driving and unintended acceleration not the same says nhtsa

Tesla vehicles that drive themselves and those that continue unintentionally are not the same, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).

In a ruling sure to satisfy Teslaphiles and Muskovites, the NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) concluded today that after reviewing the data, ODI has no evidence that supports opening a defect investigation into sudden unintended acceleration (SUA) in Teslas. In every instance in which data was available for review by ODI, the evidence shows that crashes in the complaints have been caused by pedal misapplication. There is no evidence of any fault in the accelerator pedal assemblies, motor control systems, or brake systems that has contributed to any of the incidents. There is no evidence of a design factor contributing to pedal misapplication. The theory of a potential electronic cause of SUA is based upon inaccurate assumptions about system design and log data.

On December 19, 2019, NHTSA received a petition requesting that the agency recall all Tesla Model S, Model X, and Model 3 vehicles produced from 2013 to the present due to SUA. In this petition, 232 complaints were brought to NHTSA’s attention, including 203 crashes. On January 13, 2020, NHTSA’s ODI opened Defect Petition DP20-001 to evaluate the request. ODI’s evaluation included reviews of all complaints and supporting information, as well as 14 additional complaints to NHTSA related to SUA allegations not previously submitted. The review included crash data (EDR, Tesla log data, video data) the agency acquired as part of the evaluation.

Since the information was not indicative of a vehicle-based defect, it is unlikely that any investigation would result in an order concerning the notification and remedy of a safety-related defect. Upon full consideration of the information presented in the petition and the potential risks to safety, the petition was denied. The denial of the petition does not foreclose the agency from taking further action if warranted, or the potential for a future finding that a safety-related defect exists, based upon additional information. Now if they can just get Tesla owners to realize Autopilot isn’t autonomous driving, and to keep their eyes on the road.[Images: Tesla]

#EVs #Legal #NHTSA #Tesla

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 8 comments

Farhad on Jan 09, 2021

oops!

Like Reply
Super555 on Jan 12, 2021

These were fun little cars. The rental I had one time felt really sporty. I bet the ACR cars were a blast on the track.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Dukeisduke An updated Model 3? What does "updated" mean? Will they change the styling someday?
Dukeisduke The current MSRP for a Camry LE is $26,320 plus $1,095 destination, according to their Website.
MaintenanceCosts So many truck owners would end up busted if cops just enforced existing state laws on headlight and bumper height. Those go unenforced almost everywhere in the US.Lift aside, I'm a fan of any truck that has body-color bumpers and trim. The chrome on a lot of the trucks is just way too much.Late addition: the 6.2 is an amazing engine from the driver's seat, but based on the spotty reliability record of the Gen V engines I might actually rather have the 2.7 turbo four for reliability.
Sooper Toyota already has no new vehicles on their lots; they are just another used car dealership now. So why introduce another model when Toyota appears to be going out of the new vehicle business?
Tassos There is nothing 'weird' about Finland's fine system. A few other nations have it too. Switzerland maybe, I am not sure.But you do not specify WHAT was that clown's income that required him to pay $120k for a speeding ticket?I am sure that for somebody like ELon Musk, $100k will barely operate his megayacht ONE LOUSY Day.