Mazdaspeed Isn't Coming Back, Which Might Be Okay

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

We’ve spent the last few years wondering how Mazda’s upmarket push would impact its focus on performance. But keeping tabs gradually devolved into holding out hope that the brand wouldn’t totally snub fun-to-drive products to broaden its appeal. While there’s a wealth of Japanese brands ready to sell you comfortable and well-appointed automobiles, there aren’t many devoting a sizable amount of resources into maintaining engaging driving dynamics for the whole of their lineup. Mazda used to be the exception but now seems interested in banking on its above-average styling and novel luxury aura to drive sales.

It’s not a bad strategy but appears to have come at the expense of performance. Despite Mazda products rarely being famous for the output of their powertrains (unless we’re talking in the context of size), the brand is not making up the difference in handling anymore. It also hasn’t built any new Mazdaspeed performance products in years and doesn’t seem interested in trying.

While the automaker spent the last decade issuing noncommittal answers about the fate of its performance appendage, Mazda Motor of America CEO Masahiro Moro famously insulted Mazdaspeed back in 2016 and said the company needed to grow up.

“As a brand we are trying to elevate again a little bit more, because execution of Mazda MPS or Mazdaspeed3 or whatever you call it was a little bit — I am not afraid to say it — childish,” he explained.

It was also much more thrilling to drive (even with gobs of torque steer) than anything currently in Mazda’s lineup that isn’t the MX-5. But it was not a premium vehicle — far from it. The Mazdaspeed3’s level of NVH would probably be deemed unacceptable by today’s standards and this is where the root of the problem begins to take shape. Mazda isn’t looking to build cars that cost substantially more than the competition and has decided to shore up luxury and comfort at the expense of its zoom-zoom persona.

That decision also appears to be final. According to comments intercepted by CNET during a question and answer session with media, Mazda has unofficially announced it’s done with Mazdaspeed.

From CNET:

That doesn’t mean Mazda vehicles will turn floaty and start driving in an uninspired way. Quite the contrary. The company still plans to keep a heavy focus on driving dynamics, and the latest Mazda6 and Mazda3 make good on those promises. We’ll soon know if the Mazda3 Turbo carries that torch, which you could consider as the spiritual successor to the Mazdaspeed3.

There’s also been an RX model rumored forever that’s alleged to incorporate a rotary-hybrid powertrain. But we’re doubting it’ll have anything to do with Mazdaspeed and have to reserve judgment until we’ve heard more. It sounds like wishful thinking at this point. Meanwhile, the Japanese automaker has been adamant that it’s not abandoning performance, though it’s less ready to deny claims that fun-focused trims are a thing of the past. Mazda somehow sees thrilling dynamics as a foundational aspect of the brand, whether or not it’s giving it the attention it needs.

Frankly, we’re pretty excited about the upcoming turbocharged 3 — as it should be giving both entry-level German performance and quick Asian hatchbacks a bit of competition. But it’s not attempting to provide an experience you couldn’t get elsewhere, just another way to go upmarket within the brand that happens to incorporate a truly desirable engine option. It will not be a raucous, scrappy Mazdaspeed product, nor deserving of the badge.

And that’s okay if you’re looking for something a bit more mature and less interested in keeping a smile permanently plastered on your face. If not, Hyundai’s 275-horsepower Veloster N is priced extremely close to the upcoming 2021 Mazda3 2.5 Turbo. Otherwise, the not-quite Mazdaspeed3 will set you back $29,900 for the sedan ($30,900 for the more-attractive hatchback) while offering 250 hp and 320 pounds-feet of torque on 93 octane fuel. Those figures come down a bit for those who had to settle for 87 octane on their last fill up. But customers do get all-wheel drive by default, which is fairly uncommon within the segment.

[Images: Mazda]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 12 comments
  • Jalop1991 Jalop1991 on Nov 09, 2020

    sigh. Even VW ignores the obvious "GTI all the things". Give me a Tiguan R...

  • DungBeetle62 DungBeetle62 on Nov 10, 2020

    I just don't think Mazda really has the volume to manage the additional niche marketing that a proper Mazdaspeed redux would require. Honda sell sooo many Civics that justifying the Type R is a lot more logical. I'm willing to be grateful Mazda's still got the Miata even after others have tried and failed, or moved on. Grateful enough I'm planning to get a new one soon as I can make the numbers work. I try and try to like the new 3 hatch but just can't get past that C-pillar. If anyone wants a 2007 Miata PRHT Grand Touring a grown up has put all but 14 miles on and personally did 21 out of 22 oil changes, keep me in mind right about tax refund time 2021.

  • Golden2husky The biggest hurdle for us would be the lack of a good charging network for road tripping as we are at the point in our lives that we will be traveling quite a bit. I'd rather pay more for longer range so the cheaper models would probably not make the cut. Improve the charging infrastructure and I'm certainly going to give one a try. This is more important that a lowish entry price IMHO.
  • Add Lightness I have nothing against paying more to get quality (think Toyota vs Chryco) but hate all the silly, non-mandated 'stuff' that automakers load onto cars based on what non-gearhead focus groups tell them they need to have in a car. I blame focus groups for automatic everything and double drivetrains (AWD) that really never gets used 98% of the time. The other 2% of the time, one goes looking for a place to need it to rationanalize the purchase.
  • Ger65691276 I would never buy an electric car never in my lifetime I will gas is my way of going electric is not green email
  • GregLocock Not as my primary vehicle no, although like all the rich people who are currently subsidised by poor people, I'd buy one as a runabout for town.
  • Jalop1991 is this anything like a cheap high end German car?
Next