Ford Returns to Monthly Sales Reporting

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Over the last few years, the brunt of the automotive industry gradually swapped to quarterly sales reporting. This includes Ford Motor Co., which claimed ditching the monthly model helped smooth out variances caused by fleet orders. Most automakers gave similar answers, suggesting quarterly updates would actually paint a more accurate picture of their overall health — likely hoping this would discourage investors from being scared away during a particularly rough month.

But Ford has reportedly had a change of heart and is moving back to monthly updates. While we’re happy to see it bucking the trend, it’s curious to see any automaker doing so while the industry is so vulnerable to anomalies created by government lockdowns.

Blue Oval said it’s keen to give investors more information, especially with the pandemic casting a dark shadow over the industry. Ford’s new CEO, Jim Farley, has also discussed the need for transparency on numerous occasions since taking the big office.

“My commitment to each of you is transparency, including purposeful, measurable key performance indicators so you can objectively track our progress,” Farley told market analysts late last month.

Unfortunately, Ford’s U.S. sales fell 6.1 percent in October vs the same period in 2019. But some of that can be attributed to retooling facilities for the F-Series pickup, which remains the company’s best-selling model. Truck sales were extremely healthy for the brand prior to October, especially compared to sedans (which Ford has intentionally been moving away from) and a noteworthy decline in van sales — the latter of which saw a 24 percent drop in October.

It’s not a great showing for the company when the industry as a whole enjoyed a slight 0.9-percent uptick in volume from a year earlier. But we now have more context as to why Ford’s numbers could have been better. More importantly for the company, so do investors.

While Honda, Hyundai/Kia, Mazda, Mitsubishi, Subaru, Toyota, and Volvo have been rocking monthly reports through 2020, the rest of the industry is running quarterly updates and none seemed interested in changing after we asked. But these kinds of things have a way of catching on. Ford wasn’t the first company to swap to quarterly reports in 2019. It was just following General Motors as the industry jumped onto a new trend. Maybe going back to monthlies will become the next industrial craze after rivals realize everyone now likes Ford a little more for having blazed the trail back toward genuine transparency.

[Image: Image: Ford Motor Co.]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 10 comments
  • EBFlex EBFlex on Nov 05, 2020

    Very interesting. Seems like we know the mission of Farley....make wallstreet happy. Hackett did such a good job of not having a plan and not delivering results. The stock price reflects that. Thing is tho Jimbo, a better route to take would be to look at making quality vehicles. Manufacturing junk and then reporting monthly how much junk you sold isn’t going to get you far. Fix your major quality issues that are prevalent across your entire company, stop wasting money on the train station and buyers will come back and wall street will be happy. It’s pretty simple

    • See 1 previous
    • EBFlex EBFlex on Nov 07, 2020

      @SCE to AUX Oh wow. The ignorance. Making Wall Street happy should be natural. Not forced. When you force it you end up with a clown like Hackett and vehicles that have major quality issues. You’re treating a symptom not the cause.

  • Buickman Buickman on Nov 05, 2020

    he has made a number of moves that are positive. could we finally have a leader at Ford that gets it?

  • MaintenanceCosts I wish more vehicles in our market would be at or under 70" wide. Narrowness makes everything easier in the city.
  • El scotto They should be supping with a very, very long spoon.
  • El scotto [list=1][*]Please make an EV that's not butt-ugly. Not Jaguar gorgeous but Buick handsome will do.[/*][*] For all the golf cart dudes: A Tesla S in Plaid mode will be the fastest ride you'll ever take.[/*][*]We have actual EV owners posting on here. Just calmly stated facts and real world experience. This always seems to bring out those who would argue math.[/*][/list=1]For some people an EV will never do, too far out in the country, taking trips where an EV will need recharged, etc. If you own a home and can charge overnight an EV makes perfect sense. You're refueling while you're sleeping.My condo association is allowing owners to install chargers. You have to pay all of the owners of the parking spaces the new electric service will cross. Suggested fee is 100$ and the one getting a charger pays all the legal and filing fees. I held out for a bottle of 30 year old single malt.Perhaps high end apartments will feature reserved parking spaces with chargers in the future. Until then non home owners are relying on public charge and one of my neighbors is in IT and he charges at work. It's call a perk.I don't see company owned delivery vehicles that are EV's. The USPS and the smiley boxes should be the 1st to do this. Nor are any of our mega car dealerships doing this and but of course advertising this fact.I think a great many of the EV haters haven't came to the self-actualization that no one really cares what you drive. I can respect and appreciate what you drive but if I was pushed to answer, no I really don't care what you drive. Before everyone goes into umbrage over my last sentence, I still like cars. Especially yours.I have heated tiles in my bathroom and my kitchen. The two places you're most likely to be barefoot. An EV may fall into to the one less thing to mess with for many people.Macallan for those who were wondering.
  • EBFlex The way things look in the next 5-10 years no. There are no breakthroughs in battery technology coming, the charging infrastructure is essentially nonexistent, and the price of entry is still way too high.As soon as an EV can meet the bar set by ICE in range, refueling times, and price it will take off.
  • Jalop1991 Way to bury the lead. "Toyota to offer two EVs in the states"!
Next