Stand by Your Brands: Tata Motors Says It's Keeping JLR Around
Following a failed bid to secure a helping hand from the UK government, rumors arose that Jaguar Land Rover owner Tata Group was considering selling its controlling stake in the British automaker.
The so-called rescue package didn’t see the light of day because the government felt Tata wasn’t exactly in dire financial straits. If it wanted to rustle up some dough, it would have to look elsewhere. On Monday, Tata made it clear: Jaguar Land Rover will not become an orphan again.
As reported by The Guardian, both JLR and Tata Steel, both grouped under the Tata corporate umbrella (and the latter the operator of a huge Welsh steel facility), sought out government funds before being rejected by Her Majesty’s Treasury on the basis of their parent’s fiscal health.
“Unconfirmed and unsubstantiated reports have been published by some media alleging that Tata Motors may sell [its] stake in Jaguar Land Rover,” the company said in a statement. “Tata Motors categorically denies and dismisses any such intent. Jaguar Land Rover is and remains a key pillar of Tata Motors and the wider Tata Group.”
JLR lost nearly 1 billion pounds ($1.3 billion) in the first half of the year, but Tata characterizes its fiscal situation as stable. It wasn’t the only automaker to suffer from the arrival of the coronavirus pandemic; ahead of that arrival, too, the automaker had made headway in improving its profitability following an ultimatum from its parent. The pandemic means JLR’s recovery plan will have to cut deeper.
Come next month, the automaker will have a new boss in the form of former Renault top dog Thierry Bolloré.
Had JLR secured a financial lifeline from the UK, it wouldn’t have come free of strings. The government would have demanded the automaker expedite its electric vehicle program and the phase out of polluting diesel powerplants from its lineup.
[Image: Jaguar Land Rover]
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- Statikboy Those tires are the Wrong Size.
- Mustangfast I had an 06 V6 and loved that car. 230k trouble free miles until I sold it. I remember they were criticized for being too small vs competitors but as a single guy it was the right size for me. I recall the 2.3 didn’t have a reputation for reliability, unlike the V6 and I4. I think it likely didn’t take off due to the manual-only spec, price tag, and power vs the V6 engine and the way it delivered that power. It was always fun to see the difference between these and normal ones, since these were made in Japan whereas all others were flat rock
- VoGhost Earth is healing.
- ToolGuy "Having our 4th baby and decided a camper van is a better use of our resources than my tuner."Seller is in the midst of some interesting life choices.Bonus: Here are the individuals responsible for doing the work on this vehicle.
- MaintenanceCosts Previous owner playing engineer by randomly substituting a bunch of components, then finding out. No thanks.