Nissan Thinks Recovery Could Begin in Q4 of 2020; Leadership Plots Turnaround

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

We’ve documented Nissan’s troubles for some time, breaking the situation down into numerous articles expanding upon the various elements that left the brand proclaiming this year’s financial performance will mirror 2019’s lackluster showing months ahead of the latter period’s scheduled reporting.

Everything seemed to go wrong for the company, forcing it to embrace aggressive cost-cutting measures to say afloat. U.S. sales were particularly horrendous going into the pandemic, which only added to the mounting list of hardships. Nissan is now predicting 2020 will be one of the worst financial periods in its history.

However, CEO Makoto Uchida predicts 2021 will be the point where the company finally turns a corner and begins its ascent toward sustained profitability. In fact, he believes that, with a little luck, the rebound might even begin in Q4 of this year. But that unbridled optimism is being tempered by COVID-19. Uchida worries the dreaded “second wave” could forestall Nissan’s recovery by several months.

“We expect to start to recover by Q4,” the CEO explained to Automotive News‘ Daily Drive Podcast. “That is the assumption we are looking at. But of course, we don’t know if a second wave will come. There’s a lot of uncertainty we see in front of us.”

Having endured an operating loss of ¥154 billion ($1.45 billion) in Q2 as revenue was halved, Nissan was hit with the double whammy of restructuring during a period where practically everyone had to stop building and buying cars. That situation wasn’t an anomaly within the industry, of course; the brand formerly known as Datsun just happened to be in a worse financial position than most of its peers.

Ideally, the company would like to see its operating profit margin exceed 5 percent by the start of 2024. That’s when its Nissan Next plan is scheduled to wrap — with an aim to streamline the product portfolio, bring in some more comparative (see: modern) vehicles, and reduce annual operating costs by a sizable $2.82 billion.

Uchida admits his strategy isn’t all that distinct from that of his predecessor, Hiroto Saikawa. Yet the current CEO noted that he’s betting his reputation on pulling this off, and will have more time to put it into action and benefit from the new product that’s predicted to add higher-value transactions. Nissan will continue being a budget-friendly brand, only with more vehicles in its roster that help it see larger returns per model sold.

“The quality of sales direction was set even before my time,” Uchida explained. “But of course, you will not be able to change in three months, six months, one year,” noting that new product would be an essential aspect of the overall recovery plan.

Among those, he referenced the all-electric Ariya crossover (priced around $40,000) by name. Vaguely reminiscent of the hydrogen-powered Hyundai Nexo and every other alternative-energy CUV coming out of Asia, the Ariya takes the best technology Nissan has at its disposal to deliver a more luxurious and upscale experience than the brand’s standard fare. Unfortunately, it drops on North America (after Japan) near the end of 2021. By then, the market will be saturated with similar models — including budget-focused and hardly new inclusions like the all-electric Hyundai Kona. The Korean crossover is already giving fancier models a run for their money and is probably your author’s favorite EV for non-rich people.

More competition is coming soon, with Chevrolet plotting a Bolt-based CUV that should build on its forebear’s already impressive range. Meanwhile, VW has the ID.4 and Ford has the Mach-E, both of which will be sized more similarly to the upcoming Nissan Ariya, with a bunch of premium electric crossovers already trickling out of Europe. Nissan will need to hit a home run with the model to set itself apart. Still, even delivering something competitive would be a step in the right direction (assuming EV adoption continues to improve), proving that the brand is still committed to electrification.

While Nissan assumed China would eventually become its largest market as U.S. sales volumes plateau, the situation has evolved over the last couple of years. Nissan has grown more hesitant to invest within the PRC, abandoning its joint venture with China’s Dongfeng Motor Corporation earlier this year. At the same time, it’s re-examining its prospects in India and is attempting to assess what can be done in North America. Uchida didn’t offer any concrete answers on how Nissan will handle either region, simply saying that the company is actively advancing a plan to lower costs and boost efficiency.

[Images: Memory Stockphoto/Shutterstock; Nissan]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 6 comments
  • ECurmudgeon ECurmudgeon on Aug 31, 2020

    And not one word regarding finally pulling the plug on Infiniti? Telling, that.

    • See 2 previous
    • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Sep 01, 2020

      @SSJeep You know cockroaches survived all mass extinction that killed the rest of species.

  • Jeff S Jeff S on Sep 02, 2020

    I am not as concerned about CVT acceleration as the longevity of CVTs and their expensive replacement costs especially Jatcos. Jatco transmissions along with Nissan's dismal quality make Nissan products a nonstarter for me.

  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
Next