Love's Truck Stops Adding EV Charging Stations

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Electrify America, the U.S. company Volkswagen had to create as part of its diesel emissions penance, announced Wednesday that it will work with Love’s Travel Stops to bring ultra-fast electric vehicle charging stations to seven locations in half a dozen states.

While much of the group’s work has revolved around servicing areas (often through business partnerships) where EVs tend to proliferate, the plan has also been to bolster the national charging infrastructure by providing routes that could help facilitate long-distance travel.

The new charging stations — located in Oklahoma, New Mexico, Utah, Florida, New York and Arizona — will account for a combined 28 EV chargers and should available for public use by early 2021. In its announcement, Electrify America said previous work with Love’s allowed it to complete a cross-country route between Los Angeles to Washington, D.C.

While a drop in the bucket in terms of nationwide charging coverage, partnering with Love’s seems a wise move. With over 500 locations in most American states, the travel stops tend to be among the better options for those journeying long distances. They’re also usually designed with sufficient distractions and amenities to make waiting for a recharge easier to endure. The deal is good for Love’s as well, since EV drivers will be required to linger a bit longer than their gasoline-dependent contemporaries — likely leading to additional purchases.

“As we continue building charging stations at accessible sites, Love’s Travel Stops was a perfect fit because of its convenient locations near major highways,” said Rachel Moses, senior manager for site acquisition, development and strategy at Electrify America. “Providing EV drivers with the opportunity to charge their vehicles at Love’s locations will help instill confidence for longer interstate trips, and can encourage more consumers to consider making the switch to electric.”

Electrify America said Love’s customers will have access to chargers ranging in power from 150 kilowatt (kW) to 350 kW — depending on location. Five of the sites are already open, with the planned stations in New York and Arizona being added “soon.”

While taking a company at its word is always perilous, Electrify America has done a pretty good job at establishing functional charging routes between states. Granted, you’re totally out of luck if you happen do be driving through North Dakota. Yet a cross-country journey is still possible with a little advanced planning, and coastal trips (which have the highest density of chargers) should be easier still.

The company also has helpful map of its station locations one could peruse before setting out, and the map proves that it’s been quite busy over the past few years. But it’s still only a sliver of what the country needs before EVs can be driven around as carefree as gas-powered automobiles. Large gaps in the nation’s charging infrastructure remain, and many more rural and remote charging sites will need to be added if electrification is ever to go mainstream.

[Image: Electrify America]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
11 of 15 comments
  • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Aug 19, 2020

    "the plan has also been to bolster the national charging infrastructure by providing routes that could help facilitate long-distance travel." Yes - good plan. Installing chargers where people don't need them is a waste of time, and is the reason some charging companies have failed. I think of this every time I see a charger at a grocery story or an urban parking garage. EVs arriving at these spots have already charged at home, and have likely traveled only a short distance.

    • See 1 previous
    • Indi500fan Indi500fan on Aug 19, 2020

      I usually see a couple Teslas at the local Meijer charge station, but the charger is a long way from the store entrance so I wonder if the cars are from some nearby condos.

  • Notapreppie Notapreppie on Aug 19, 2020

    Since Love's is primarily a rural watering hole, I expect a lot of these to be blocked by good ol' boys in their brodozers.

    • See 6 previous
    • Rpn453 Rpn453 on Aug 21, 2020

      @mcs It would be easy for a 5000 lb AWD EV to drag a half-ton that is in park in 2WD. Even a 3/4-ton in park in 2WD should be pretty easy. With a really good jerk and excellent tires, maybe it's possible to get a parked 8000 lb truck locked in 4WD moving enough to keep the dynamic friction up to the point that it can be maintained. But I'd have to see it to believe it. I can only imagine an EV hooking up and then the brodozer driver coming out and dragging the EV around like this, except with far less effort involved: www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQM_UmUsz_0

  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Off-road fluff on vehicles that should not be off road needs to die.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Saw this posted on social media; “Just bought a 2023 Tundra with the 14" screen. Let my son borrow it for the afternoon, he connected his phone to listen to his iTunes.The next day my insurance company raised my rates and added my son to my policy. The email said that a private company showed that my son drove the vehicle. He already had his own vehicle that he was insuring.My insurance company demanded he give all his insurance info and some private info for proof. He declined for privacy reasons and my insurance cancelled my policy.These new vehicles with their tech are on condition that we give up our privacy to enter their world. It's not worth it people.”
Next