By on August 25, 2020

Frequently on the cutting edges of technology, the automotive industry has been slamming chips into vehicles to facilitate communications ever since General Motors launched OnStar back in 1996. This evolved into cars boasting reliable navigation systems and remote vehicle diagnostics until they literally started becoming mobile internet hot spots.

Now the industry wants to further ingrain connectivity by equipping all vehicles with 5G — opening the road for new features and the ability to harvest your personal data more effectively.

This has required deals with tech chip manufacturers like Qualcomm, which requires companies to sign a patent license agreement before actually selling any of its hardware or software. But regulators around the globe worried the practice may be monopolistic, violating antitrust laws. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) brought a case against the business in 2017. Despite winning that case in 2019, a U.S. appeals court overturned the decision earlier this month, deciding Qualcomm could continue conducting business as usual. Now, tech companies (mainly Qualcomm rivals) and a gaggle of automakers are urging the FTC to seek an appeal following the loss.

In May of 2019, U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh in San Jose, California sided against Qualcomm after stating it had engaged in extensive anti-competitive behavior against smartphone makers and automakers in need of chip modems, threatening to withhold suppliers and service if it didn’t like the way it bundled the fees associated with wireless patents.

She decided the best course of action was to issue an injunction limiting Qualcomm’s business practices, ordering it to renegotiate the licensing agreements.

However, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth District overturned that ruling in August of 2020 after deciding there wasn’t enough evidence against the chip manufacturer. “We decline to ascribe antitrust liability in these dynamic and rapidly changing technology markets without clearer proof of anticompetitive effect,” Consuelo M. Callahan, circuit judge for the ninth district, explained.

According to Reuters, the automotive sector is concerned that giving Qualcomm a pass will increase the price of their products. It also diminishes an automaker’s ability to have control over the equipment installed into vehicles to network them, though that aspect has been downplayed in both the courts and the press.

From Reuters:

Automakers have increasingly put chips in vehicles to connect them to the internet, which requires them to sign patent agreements for communications standards such as 5G. The companies had previously argued that connected car prices could go up if Qualcomm won its case.

Qualcomm won its appeal of that ruling before the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in an Aug. 11 ruling by a three-judge panel. In a letter sent Monday, the automakers, as well as Qualcomm rivals Intel Corp and MediaTek Inc, urged the FTC to seek an “en banc” rehearing of the case by the full appeals court.

“If allowed to stand, the panel’s decision could destabilize the standards ecosystem by encouraging the abuse of market power acquired through collaborative standard-setting,” the group said.

In addition to tech companies and cell-phone manufacturers, the letter was signed by Tesla Inc, Ford Motor Co, Honda Motor Co and Daimler AG.

“This decision would endanger domestic competitiveness, as well as weaken the ability of the FTC to protect consumers through future enforcement actions,” reads the letter. “Qualcomm’s licensing practices reinforced its product monopoly, excluded rivals, and harmed the competitive process.”

Ironically, loads of the names that have signed on to ask the FTC to keep up the fight seem to have flirted with monopolistic practices themselves. But wanting to buy a product from a company like Qualcomm and then not wanting to be smacked with licensing fees or restrictions on how its utilized seems a fair request. Hopefully automakers remember that as they roll out egregious concepts (like placing already-equipped features behind a paywall using the same 5G technology they’re fighting for now) — because several of the automakers included in the letter are already flirting with the concept.

 

[Image: Michael Vi/Shutterstock]

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

8 Comments on “Cash in Your Chips: Automakers Ask FTC to Seek Appeal After Losing Qualcomm Case...”


  • avatar

    Just what I need…more tech conglomerates tracking me and trying to sell me crap I don’t need. “We noticed you stopped at McDonald’s a few times this week. Here’s 50% off a membership to a gym that’s in the same strip mall.”
    The problem is that all this crap is going to be hard wired in so you won’t just be able to unplug it. And before somebody out there calls me out about my phone doing the same thing, I’m well aware but I can always turn the phone off or leave it at home.

  • avatar
    Imagefont

    Wait until your cable television starts showing you targeted commercials based on conversations overheard by Alexa and all the other listening devices in your house, including your phone. And your refrigerator might tip off your TV that you like Ben and Jerry’s.

    • 0 avatar
      mcs

      When Alexa starts doing that kind of listening, that’s when Alexa starts getting continuous streams of various tv shows fed into her microphone. I can also build outgoing filters.

      I’ve seen some interesting tracking. Not far from me is a bike trail that goes through the outdoor dining area expanded due to COVID. It’s kind of cool and you’re passing wait staff pushing carts on the trail. The restaurant paid for the paving, so it’s okay. The day after the ride, I was seeing ads for the restaurant on my devices.

      I do experiment with messing with the ad trackers. I currently have the online advertising universe thinking I’m also British. It’s kind of hilarious to see the British advertising showing up. When I get time and if I’m bored, I’m going to try and get even more creative messing with them.

  • avatar
    James2

    Intel… gripe about monopolistic practices? They should teach Qualcomm how to do it better.

  • avatar
    Old_WRX

    Always more electromagnetic radiation. How long before it cooks our brains like an egg in the microwave?

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Lou_BC: “The same people who recognize the greed will stay away” Agreed. I’d like to buy a new...
  • mcs: You’re probably thinking of their gas-powered models which do have a problem with catching fire. Hopefully...
  • Inside Looking Out: Startups are always risky proposition. If you want to get rich you have to take risk. Кто не...
  • Polka King: Is this thing going to burst into flames in the forest some day?
  • DenverMike: New car sales have been in decline years before covid 19 and with more automakers coming on line all the...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber