Barra Gets Half: Appeals Court Nixes Make-Nice Meeting Between GM, Fiat Chrysler

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

General Motors saw half of its wishes granted this week, after an appeals court overturned an order by U.S. District Judge Paul Borman for the CEOs of GM and Fiat Chrysler to meet and settle their differences in person.

GM is suing FCA, accusing its crosstown rival of racketeering and claiming it lost billions of dollars via FCA’s bribing of UAW officials in return for a series of favorable, low-cost labor agreements. The General wants to go all the way with its case, but Borman stepped in, calling the suit a “nuclear” option. The in-person meeting is now off the table, but Borman’s still on the case.

Part of GM’s appeal sought Borman’s removal from the case; alas, this was not to be.

As reported by The Associated Press (via The Detroit News), the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals kiboshed the request for GM CEO Mary Barra and FCA CEO Mike Manley to meet in person and work out their differences. Had GM not appealed, that meeting would have occurred sometime last week.

Stating that Borman abused his power by calling for the meeting, the appeals court nonetheless said the judge could still order “a pretrial settlement conference and/or mediation in the normal course.”

The cozy relationship that existed between UAW officials and FCA officials tasked with bargaining with them has been well established by the ongoing federal probe into corruption among the union’s upper ranks. The fact that FCA’s former labor chief is currently cooling his heels in prison is testament to that fact. Still, FCA reiterated its earlier claim that GM’s lawsuit is baseless, vowing to fight its rival in any way necessary.

Just as unbowed, GM pledged to continue the battle.

“This is an important case because former FCA executives have already admitted they conspired to use bribes to gain labor benefits, concessions and advantages,” the automaker said in a statement. “As the facts will show, their corruption caused direct harm to GM and we have a responsibility to our stakeholders seek justice and hold FCA accountable.”

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 8 comments
  • Conslaw Conslaw on Jul 07, 2020

    Barra should have gone along with the meeting. It might have given GM the chance to cut a sweet deal with FCA.

    • See 1 previous
    • Akear Akear on Jul 08, 2020

      @Lorenzo She is more concerned about PSA taking over FCA and making this new company larger than GM. She created this situation by selling Opel to PSA, which in turn emboldened them to take over FCA. GM will drop to fifth place because of Barra's poor strategic planning.

  • Jeff S Jeff S on Jul 08, 2020

    I don't think GM cares about being in the top anymore. Barra's goal is to cost cut GM into profitability regardless of what happens to GM. Get the earnings per share and market value up enough and maybe another corporation will buy them like Geeley or Tata and she and the board will get a big payout. Agree that Barra is concerned about PSA taking over FCA but she cannot stop it and she needs to negotiate because I doubt GM will win this case. A desperate act of a desperate CEO who has no other plans except to shed more corporate assets and more cost cuts till there is nothing left of GM except a carcass for the vultures to pick clean.

  • 1995 SC As this is another car with Toyota badging that they didn't actually build, perhaps this is the new Supra.
  • ToolGuy Weather was cooler yesterday and there was a slight noise on startup several hundred miles from home. We better add 'water pump' to the watch list for the daily driver. Can you remind me when we get home? Thanks.
  • ToolGuy Is it pronounced BMW (-"uh") or BMW (-"eh")?
  • Tassos This makes zero sense. IF Stellantis' dismal showing is indeed HIS fault, why keep him another 14 months AT LEAST? The Billions of extra losses will be 100 times more than the few millions they would give him for early termination. But I am pretty sure it is NOT his fault, but the DISMAL PRODUCT he had to work with. ..................Maybe it will take more than 14 months to find a DECENT REPLACEMENT for him?
  • 3SpeedAutomatic 66 yr old retiree. Had ‘12 Ford Escape at $780 each six months. Recently replaced with ‘22 Passport $900 each six months. Liability at max ($250k), plus comp/collision on each due to many in Louisiana without auto insurance. Could not afford uninsured motorists for that would double premium.Latest scam are those with temporary license plates on older cars. Sign that they don’t have insurance. Temporary tags are easily duplicated. Getting out of hand. 🚗🚗🚗
Next