Toyota's Prius Recall Makes Another Cameo

toyotas prius recall makes another cameo

Toyota Motor Corp. is recalling roughly 752,000 vehicles due to a presumed faulty hybrid system. Around 267,000 of the affected units are Prius vehicles sold in the United States.

According to the manufacturer, certain Prius (MY 2013-2015) and Prius V (2014-2017) models can fail to enter fail-safe driving mode in response to certain hybrid system faults. While the conditions for this are said to be fairly specific (though not explained by the automaker in any detail), the resulting failure would see the car lose power and stall. Obviously, this represents a safety risk.

Thus far, Toyota hasn’t acknowledged any injuries stemming from the issue, though it did say it could pose a serious hazard to motorists traveling at speed. Rather than defaulting to limp mode when problems arise, affected vehicles may simply cut power entirely. Toyota said steering and braking should no be affected, however.

This isn’t the first time the issue has cropped up. Toyota recalled 2.4 million hybrid models (globally) in 2018 under similar circumstances. As in this case, the vehicles’ software couldn’t understand how to enter fail-safe mode, so a software fix was issued to remedy the problem. Yet that wasn’t the first time Toyota had to address the matter. Similar recalls were made in 2019, 2014, and 2015 — making us believe there might be more at play than some software gremlins.

From Toyota:

For all involved vehicles, Toyota dealers will update the hybrid system software at no charge. For customer satisfaction, if the vehicle has experienced an inverter failure with certain hybrid system faults related to this condition, the inverter will be repaired or replaced at no charge to customers.

Owners of involved vehicles will be notified by late August 2020.

Customers who aren’t interested in waiting two months to be abridged of the situation may want to hit up the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) recalls website to see if their vehicle makes the cut. All that’s needed is the VIN and a little free time. Toyota’s Customer Experience Center can likewise be reached at 1-800-331-4331.

[Image: Toyota]

Comments
Join the conversation
 2 comments
  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Jun 25, 2020

    Yesterday I was standing in front of my truck goosing it to a high idle (bleeding coolant system) with another vehicle not far behind me and suddenly got terrified for no good reason. Rechecked that it was in park, rechecked the parking brake (as if that would do much), and then recalled that the software on my vehicle can't switch the truck into forward gear. [It's a keeper.]

  • APaGttH APaGttH on Jun 25, 2020

    You mean to tell me that blocking of the left lane is because they stalled out and are coasting? Makes sense now

  • Sgeffe Bronco looks with JLR “reliability!”What’s not to like?!
  • FreedMike Back in the '70s, the one thing keeping consumers from buying more Datsuns was styling - these guys were bringing over some of the ugliest product imaginable. Remember the F10? As hard as I try to blot that rolling aberration from my memory, it comes back. So the name change to Nissan made sense, and happened right as they started bringing over good-looking product (like the Maxima that will be featured in this series). They made a pretty clean break.
  • Flowerplough Liability - Autonomous vehicles must be programmed to make life-ending decisions, and who wants to risk that? Hit the moose or dive into the steep grassy ditch? Ram the sudden pile up that is occurring mere feet in front of the bumper or scan the oncoming lane and swing left? Ram the rogue machine that suddenly swung into my lane, head on, or hop up onto the sidewalk and maybe bump a pedestrian? With no driver involved, Ford/Volkswagen or GM or whomever will bear full responsibility and, in America, be ambulance-chaser sued into bankruptcy and extinction in well under a decade. Or maybe the yuge corporations will get special, good-faith, immunity laws, nation-wide? Yeah, that's the ticket.
  • FreedMike It's not that consumers wouldn't want this tech in theory - I think they would. Honestly, the idea of a car that can take over the truly tedious driving stuff that drives me bonkers - like sitting in traffic - appeals to me. But there's no way I'd put my property and my life in the hands of tech that's clearly not ready for prime time, and neither would the majority of other drivers. If they want this tech to sell, they need to get it right.
  • TitaniumZ Of course they are starting to "sour" on the idea. That's what happens when cars start to drive better than people. Humanpilots mostly suck and make bad decisions.
Next