Self-driving's Not the Only Development in the Ford-Volkswagen Relationship

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Autonomous vehicle technology might not be a sexy topic for many some, but human-driven vehicles certainly are. One day we’ll gaze at steering wheels in a sterile museum with a mixture of animalistic hunger and soul-crushing depression.

Sure, Ford’s tie-up with Volkswagen includes self-driving technology (sourced from another tie-up, this one with Argo AI), but that’s only part of the agreement. Late last week, the two automakers moved forward on other projects that might be of interest to you.

On May 28th, VW’s Supervisory Board approved further projects under the alliance forged between the two companies early last year. The loose marriage of sorts is three-pronged, with one arm tasked with gathering and sharing self-driving tech for mobility projects. The other two include the creation of commercial vehicles for Europe and electric vehicles for Ford based on VW’s dedicated MEB architecture. Ford will bring the truck know-how, with VW providing the EV expertise.

“The next milestones in the vehicle projects are anticipated to be implemented in near the future with the signatures of both companies,” VW said in statement. “Three projects in the areas of electrification and commercial vehicles are planned to be realized as a first step.”

These projects are, for starters, the creation of a new MEB-based electric vehicle for Ford’s European customers. In that emissions-averse region, electrification is key to an automaker’s future standing. Ford needs something more accessible (read: cheaper) than the upcoming Mustang Mach-E. Enter new pal VW.

Also on the roster is a midsize pickup to be developed by Ford and “adapted by Volkswagen Commercial Vehicles in selected markets” The German automaker’s overseas-only Amarok is long in the tooth and VW would rather not fund the entirety of a replacement’s development costs. Enter the Ford Ranger as a seductive muse. Before the pandemic arrived, it was expected that a Ranger-based Amarok would see the light of day in 2022; it isn’t known whether the schedule has changed enough to alter the target date.

Lastly, the Supervisory Board green lit two van projects, with VE stating, “Volkswagen Commercial Vehicles will be responsible for the development of a city delivery van, while Ford will oversee planning for a van in the one-ton loader segment.”

Ford’s Transit trounces all others in the larger commercial van space, and VW would very much like to get itself a piece of that sweet fleet manager action.

VW admits that “additional projects may follow” to capitalize on the two company’s strengths and create value for the other.

[Image: Gyuszko-Photo/Shutterstock]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
 3 comments
  • Vulpine Vulpine on Jun 02, 2020

    In 50 years people are going to wonder how their ancestors ever drove with just a wheel and two/three pedals. Their lives will be all push-button and probably virtual push-buttons oriented.

    • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Jun 02, 2020

      On this point, several years ago my nephew had the opportunity to drive a Model T. He needed driving lessons before he could do it, because the controls are unlike those in modern vehicles.

  • Cardave5150 Cardave5150 on Jun 02, 2020

    So, as we've seen from previous posts about VW's upcoming BEV's - they're not "ready for prime time," with early adopters being the beta testers, and Ford is signing up to use their architecture for their own vehicles?? Isn't that like watching a puppy walk right into a spinning fan blade?

  • Jalop1991 is this anything like a cheap high end German car?
  • HotRod Not me personally, but yes - lower prices will dramatically increase the EV's appeal.
  • Slavuta "the price isn’t terrible by current EV standards, starting at $47,200"Not terrible for a new Toyota model. But for a Vietnamese no-name, this is terrible.
  • Slavuta This is catch22 for me. I would take RAV4 for the powertrain alone. And I wouldn't take it for the same thing. Engines have history of issues and transmission shifts like glass. So, the advantage over hard-working 1.5 is lost.My answer is simple - CX5. This is Japan built, excellent car which has only one shortage - the trunk space.
  • Slavuta "Toyota engineers have told us that they intentionally build their powertrains with longevity in mind"Engine is exactly the area where Toyota 4cyl engines had big issues even recently. There was no longevity of any kind. They didn't break, they just consumed so much oil that it was like fueling gasoline and feeding oil every time
Next