GM: V6 Engines to Start Flowing Monday

gm v6 engines to start flowing monday

With General Motors aiming for a May 18th restart of North American vehicle production, powertrain components, in some cases, need a head start. That’s why May 11th will be the first day back to work for many employees of GM’s St. Catharines Propulsion Plant, home to much-used V6 and V8 engines, as well as a transmission.

The gradual return to work ahead of GM’s restart date comes after the Canadian labor leader Jerry Dias expressed concern over workplace safety.

“Starting May 11th a portion of our HFV6 line will resume in St. Catharines and the balance of St. Catharines operations, CAMI and Oshawa Stamped Parts Operations will come back gradually in the weeks that follow,” GM Canada spokesperson Jennifer Wright told The Canadian Press (via Canadian Manufacturing).

The bulk of St. Catharines’ V6 output is the 3.6-liter variant found in GM’s midsize pickups and large crossovers. The Ontario plant also builds 5.3- and 6.2-liter V8s, as well as a six-speed automatic found in the Chevrolet Sonic and Equinox.

Wright added that “extensive safety measures” will be in place at each Canadian GM plant upon opening, mirroring efforts made in the United States. Those efforts have the tepid approval of the United Auto Workers, which didn’t step in and protest the decision by GM and Fiat Chrysler to reopen U.S. plants as soon as Michigan dropped its guard. The state’s stay-at-home order runs out on May 15th.

Speaking of FCA’s production intentions earlier this week, Unifor President Jerry Dias said he wasn’t sure how to feel about various plants’ preparedness (read: distancing measures and personal protective equipment) until he speaks with the heads of union locals.

[Image: General Motors]

Comments
Join the conversation
 3 comments
  • Sgeffe Bronco looks with JLR “reliability!”What’s not to like?!
  • FreedMike Back in the '70s, the one thing keeping consumers from buying more Datsuns was styling - these guys were bringing over some of the ugliest product imaginable. Remember the F10? As hard as I try to blot that rolling aberration from my memory, it comes back. So the name change to Nissan made sense, and happened right as they started bringing over good-looking product (like the Maxima that will be featured in this series). They made a pretty clean break.
  • Flowerplough Liability - Autonomous vehicles must be programmed to make life-ending decisions, and who wants to risk that? Hit the moose or dive into the steep grassy ditch? Ram the sudden pile up that is occurring mere feet in front of the bumper or scan the oncoming lane and swing left? Ram the rogue machine that suddenly swung into my lane, head on, or hop up onto the sidewalk and maybe bump a pedestrian? With no driver involved, Ford/Volkswagen or GM or whomever will bear full responsibility and, in America, be ambulance-chaser sued into bankruptcy and extinction in well under a decade. Or maybe the yuge corporations will get special, good-faith, immunity laws, nation-wide? Yeah, that's the ticket.
  • FreedMike It's not that consumers wouldn't want this tech in theory - I think they would. Honestly, the idea of a car that can take over the truly tedious driving stuff that drives me bonkers - like sitting in traffic - appeals to me. But there's no way I'd put my property and my life in the hands of tech that's clearly not ready for prime time, and neither would the majority of other drivers. If they want this tech to sell, they need to get it right.
  • TitaniumZ Of course they are starting to "sour" on the idea. That's what happens when cars start to drive better than people. Humanpilots mostly suck and make bad decisions.
Next