For Fiat Chrysler, Minivans and Muscle Cars Might Have to Wait

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Fiat Chrysler is prepared to ramp up its U.S. manufacturing presence starting May 18th, but the situation on the south side of the Detroit River is another story. That’s according to Unifor President Jerry Dias, whose union represents Detroit Three autoworkers in Canada.

Dias’ U.S. counterpart, UAW President Rory Gamble, is now on board with FCA’s restart plan after initially opposing an early return to work, but the Canadian labor official is now having a change of heart.

Last month, Dias seemed eager to get plants open ASAP, but not anymore. He told Automotive News that the automaker’s 8,500 workers remain in an uncertain amount of danger, despite plans for medical assessment tents and various indoor mitigation measures outside FCA facilities.

“The bottom line is I’m not sure if I’m there at all,” Dias told the publication in advance of FCA’s official announcement of a cross-border May 18th restart.

On the other side of the river, Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer could still put the brakes on a restart; thus far, the existing stay-at-home order will run out on May 15th, though the emergency order — which does not impact manufacturing plants — has since been extended.

In Ontario, where FCA’s Windsor minivan and Brampton LX-platform car assembly plants reside, Premier Doug Ford has extended his jurisdiction’s emergency orders to May 19th. An easing in workplace shutterings began May 4th, though only for a select few types of businesses.

“I need to make sure their concerns are completely alleviated before we would give any sort of a green light,” said Dias of local union leaders. “With this date being kicked around, I’m going to have to have another conversation. The bottom line is, before I give anything the final seal of approval, I have to makes sure the local union leadership is comfortable with what transpired in the plants. Until they give me the go-ahead, I’m not there.”

It’s assumed that conversation is now underway, if not already completed. Dias mentioned that workers at the Windsor plant are scheduled to undergo coronavirus-related health and safety training on Friday.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 7 comments
  • Lorenzo Lorenzo on May 06, 2020

    Well, there's always Jeep assembly in Toledo. Ohio will be back to normal before Michigan, Illinois, and Canada. I don't know how bad the Wuhan virus situation is in FCA's Mexican plants (Tijuana has problems), but Ram Trucks might still be coming for awhile.

  • Scott Scott on May 06, 2020

    GM powertrain in Canada starts some production on the 11th, and starts gaining speed from there.

  • Slavuta CX5 hands down. Only trunk space, where RAV4 is better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Oof 😣 for Tesla.https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-05-03-nhtsa-probes-tesla-recall-over-autopilot-concerns.html
  • Slavuta Autonomous cars can be used by terrorists.
  • W Conrad I'm not afraid of them, but they aren't needed for everyone or everywhere. Long haul and highway driving sure, but in the city, nope.
  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
Next