Ford Briefly Closes Plants After Workers Test Positive for COVID-19

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Ford Motor Co. temporarily shut down its Chicago Assembly Plant for a portion of Tuesday after two employees tested positive for the novel coronavirus. The facility had only been open for a single day, suggesting automakers may have to contend with infected employees on a regular basis. Responsible for Ford Explorer, Police Interceptor Utility, and Lincoln Aviator production, the site was idled briefly for disinfection before being reopened on Wednesday morning.

This return proved short-lived. The Chicago Tribune reports that Chicago Assembly closed again today, although COVID-19 was not to blame. Wednesday’s culprit happened to be those nasty supply chain issues we’ve been harping on. Ford’s Dearborn Truck Plant (home of the F-Series) did have a fresh coronavirus case, however. The facility was forced to match the Chicago factory’s response and shut down for sanitization measures on the same day — though at least Dearborn Truck seems to have a sufficient number of parts on hand.

Ford spokeswoman Kelli Felker explained that an unidentified supplier had left the automaker short on parts in Chicago, declining to name specific names. She did say that the matter would likely be resolved by Wednesday evening, with production resuming before Thursday morning.

From the Chicago Tribune:

At full capacity, the assembly plant runs with three shifts, seven days a week. Ford’s stamping plant in Chicago Heights also reopened Monday.

The Dearborn, Michigan-based automaker said it notified workers known to have been in close contact with the infected individuals at the Chicago Assembly Plant and asked them to self-quarantine for 14 days.

“It is important to note that due to incubation time, we know these employees did not contract COVID-19 while at work. Our protocols are in place to help stop the spread of the virus,” Felker said in a text.

Get comfortable with these kinds of incidents, as they’re likely to remain the status quo for a while. Despite the whole world trying to restore supply chains to a state approaching normalcy, they’re a total mess and will likely take weeks to get back in order. Meanwhile, automakers have implemented protocol at factory sites to help identify infected workers while making procedural changes designed to help protect staff.

Unfortunately, forcing facilities to shut down every time someone comes in with a fever may have wide-ranging consequences. Having been largely business-free for two months, domestic automakers are desperate to resume production and get some sales in before 2020 ends. And yet they’re going to pause every single time a new infection appears so that a factory can be sterilized.

Despite a weird amount of censorship surrounding the issue, we’ve gradually learned that coronavirus contagion rates are probably a lot higher than anyone realized, while the mortality rate is much lower than originally feared. Basically, everyone who was initially eager to prohibit “misinformation” ended up censoring valid information, while “authoritative sources” gradually changed their tune. This caused plenty of panic and confusion around policy at a time when facts were few, likely influencing the collective response.

The picture is somewhat clearer now, and COVID-19 is looking a little less scary for it. It’s still spreading, though, and there’s good reason to take steps to curtail that. Unfortunately, automakers are already well behind their production schedules and may be further hindered if they have to take a day off whenever someone shows signs of illness… not that there’s much of an alternative. The UAW has been adamant that protecting workers is its top priority, saying it won’t settle for automakers doing anything but the most they can to improve testing and reduce infections. Local governments have said much the same, with some states only agreeing to let production resume after manufacturers submitted health and safety plans.

For Ford, this has meant introducing routine temperature checks for employees, mandating face masks, providing face shields, as well as expanding the time between production shifts to limit interaction between employees. It also means reacting aggressively to any new outbreak, which is where we get our first bit of good news.

Ford said that, due to the incubation period of COVID-19, the infected employees couldn’t have gotten the virus at work. They also didn’t spend a lot of time on the assembly line, limiting the chance of spreading the virus to someone else. Those health checks will hopefully ensure that’s the case, though we’ll be watching to see how effective the new countermeasures prove to be in the coming months — both in terms of containing the pandemic and helping automakers stay on schedule.

[Image: Ford Motor Co.]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
10 of 55 comments
  • EBFlex EBFlex on May 22, 2020

    https://www.yahoo.com/news/coronavirus-scientist-quicker-exit-lockdown-072039855.html Oh how interesting. Yet another extremely smart individual saying the lockdown needs to end because infection rates are far higher than reported. Man it’s good to be right.

    • See 4 previous
    • Lou_BC Lou_BC on May 22, 2020

      "Man it’s good to be right" It is obvious that you are using "right" as a position on the political spectrum as opposed to being correct. It is also obvious that you don't read what you post. The dude offering his opinion is a "theoretical epidemiologist". He was pointing out that England's original projections were worst case. He also bases his assumptions upon the theory that SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence is currently very high. Sweden's seroprevalence rate is 7.3%. They believed it should have been 30% by now. Any country performing seroprevalence testing are showing lower than expected numbers.

  • Jkross22 Jkross22 on May 22, 2020

    It's not clear to me why every company in the auto supply chain cannot test their employees prior to returning to work. I'm not talking every employee.... just the ones who cannot do their job remotely. If an employee is in a high risk group - diabetes, obesity, heart condition, etc. - the decision to return to work is a MUCH more difficult one to make.

    • See 2 previous
    • Lou_BC Lou_BC on May 22, 2020

      @jkross22 Ford should use a car plant to build testing equipment. They'd make more money that way.

  • Formula m For the gas versions I like the Honda CRV. Haven’t driven the hybrids yet.
  • SCE to AUX All that lift makes for an easy rollover of your $70k truck.
  • SCE to AUX My son cross-shopped the RAV4 and Model Y, then bought the Y. To their surprise, they hated the RAV4.
  • SCE to AUX I'm already driving the cheap EV (19 Ioniq EV).$30k MSRP in late 2018, $23k after subsidy at lease (no tax hassle)$549/year insurance$40 in electricity to drive 1000 miles/month66k miles, no range lossAffordable 16" tiresVirtually no maintenance expensesHyundai (for example) has dramatically cut prices on their EVs, so you can get a 361-mile Ioniq 6 in the high 30s right now.But ask me if I'd go to the Subaru brand if one was affordable, and the answer is no.
  • David Murilee Martin, These Toyota Vans were absolute garbage. As the labor even basic service cost 400% as much as servicing a VW Vanagon or American minivan. A skilled Toyota tech would take about 2.5 hours just to change the air cleaner. Also they also broke often, as they overheated and warped the engine and boiled the automatic transmission...
Next