Fiat Chrysler-PSA Merger Heads to EU Regulators
The European Union’s antitrust regulators could easily allow the proposed $50 billion merger between Fiat Chrysler and France’s PSA Group to sail onward unopposed… or decide to throw a wrench into the works.
Both companies started funneling the necessary applications to the European Commission back in February, but Monday brought word of a decision date: on or before June 17th.
In a filing reported by Reuters, the European Commission indicated that both automakers sought EU approval on Friday. Following an investigation to see whether the corporate marriage is on the up and up, regulators could issue a thumbs-up, or hold up everything with a four-month investigation.
As reported by Automotive News Europe in February, two early areas of concern cropped up; those being the sale of small cars in southern Europe, and the region’s commercial van market. Combined, the two companies share 46 percent of sales in the latter camp and 35.1 percent of the former. PSA boss Carlos Tavares said at the time that he didn’t see any reason for concern.
“But our stance is very simple: Whatever we have to discuss or modify, we will,” Tavares said.
Under the merger, which both companies hope to have in place early next year, PSA’s boss would serve as chief executive of the whole operation. John Elkann, chairman of FCA, would see his purview extend over PSA’s former real estate, too. Apparently, the combination of the two companies wouldn’t see any brands shed from either entity, though it remains to be seen just how unimpeachable that promise really was.
The binding merger agreement between the two companies was signed last December. Both automakers say 40 percent of the savings expected to arise from the pair-up will come from platform and technology sharing.
[Image: Fiat Chrysler]
More by Steph Willems
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- Lorenzo A union in itself doesn't mean failure, collective bargaining would mean failure.
- Ajla Why did pedestrian fatalities hit their nadir in 2009 and overall road fatalities hit their lowest since 1949 in 2011? Sedans were more popular back then but a lot of 300hp trucks and SUVs were on the road starting around 2000. And the sedans weren't getting smaller and slower either. The correlation between the the size and power of the fleet with more road deaths seems to be a more recent occurrence.
- Jeff_M It's either a three on the tree OR it's an automatic. It ain't both.
- Lorenzo I'm all in favor of using software and automation to BUILD cars, but keep that junk off my instrument panel, especially the software enabled interactive junk. Just give me the knobs and switches so I can control the vehicle, with no interconnectivity of any kind.
- MaintenanceCosts Modern cars detach people from their speed too much. The combination of tall ride height, super-effective sound insulation, massive power, and electronic aids makes people quite unaware of just how much kinetic energy is nominally under their control while they watch a movie on their phone with one hand and eat a Quarter Pounder with the other. I think that is the primary reason we are seeing an uptick in speed-related fatalities, especially among people NOT in cars.With that said, I don't think Americans have proven responsible enough to have unlimited speed in cars. Although I'd hate it, I still would support limiters that kick in at 10 over in the city and 20 over on the freeway, because I think they would save more than enough lives to be worth the pain.