On the Rebound: U.S. Auto Sales Begin Long, Slow Recovery

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

It’s been a long month and change for most Americans, and by no means is anyone out of the woods, either employment-wise or health-wise. Same goes for new vehicle sales, which remain depressed after falling off a cliff in late March.

The difference now is that sales are rising.

Not on a year-over-year basis, with gains made over “normal times” tallies. No, nothing like that. But they have started a slow climb out of the pit after hitting rock bottom, which represents another brick laid on the pathway to normality.

Always the cheerful optimists, we are. Sunny, even.

In its weekly look at the U.S. auto industry’s journey into runaway viral madness, J.D. Power published data showing sales down 48 percent below its pre-virus forecast for the week ending April 19th. Sounds bad, but it’s actually the third week in a row to show slight improvement.

A week previous, sales fell 51 percent below forecast. A week before that, 55 percent. The last full week of March showed U.S. sales down 59 percent below forecast. So, a slow recovery is underway, helped along by an easing viral situation in certain regions and the passage of laws allowing remote sales in states that previously forbid the practice. Michigan allowed online sales earlier this month, with Pennsylvania going this route on Monday (after the latest reporting period).

It’s worth noting that, at the end of March, five U.S. states outlawed any and all forms of dealer sales. In the week ending April 19th, 44 percent of the country’s dealers remained open, with 56 percent offering online or remote sales.

After a near-total cratering of sales in New York City and Detroit at the beginning of the month, the two markets are now on the rebound, with NYC down 77 percent last week and the Motor City down 85 percent. Normality will not occur overnight. Resilient markets like Phoenix and Dallas, which served as bright spots in the the past weeks, saw their sales tallies improve further, with drops vs pre-virus forecast of only 14 and 20 percent, respectively.

“Volume grew in all top 25 markets last week, except Denver,” J.D. Power noted.

Like in previous weeks, the large pickup segment outpaced all others in its stability, but growth in sales elsewhere lessened the gap. In fact, large pickups declined 16 percent below the pre-virus forecast last week — the segment’s worst performance in weeks. Meanwhile, small SUVs saw their sales vs forecast rise from negative 62 percent at the beginning of the month to negative 44 percent. Compact SUVs saw a smaller climb, to 57 percent below forecast.

Even compact cars, the hardest hit of the Top 5 segments, saw a mild improvement in the past week, with volume growing from 65 percent below forecast on April 5th to 60 percent below on the 19th. Small victories, and all that.

Meanwhile, the five premium segments all recorded improvements, though not one of those segments has crossed to the happy side of the 50-percent-below barrier. At this point, buyers seem more reluctant to purchase a high-end vehicle versus a mainstream one.

Elsewhere, other trends are underway. Like the fact that average transaction prices have dropped two weeks in a row as large, big-bucks pickups make up a smaller slice of the retail mix amid rising sales in other segments. ATPs are down $600 from two weeks ago, and incentive spend per unit has decreased in kind. At an average of $4,700 per vehicle, it’s still near the record high set earlier in the month.

Why such a small decrease in incentive spending despite a lower share of pickups? Non-Detroit Three automakers have picked up the spiff torch, dropping cash on the hoods of vehicles in a bid to spur consumption.

As the retail mix evolves to a more normal blend, sales of non-premium Detroit Three products still outrank “imports” 46 percent to 43 percent. That’s the closest the two sides have been since the week ending March 22nd, when the two matched in terms of volume.

Another trend? The percentage of new leased vehicles continues to climb, to 26 percent of sales last week, after falling to 21 percent at the end of March and beginning of April. Normal leasing figures are 32 or 33 percent. Meanwhile, the number of sales financed with look-over-here zero-percent/84-month loans has fallen slightly, from 22 percent to 19 percent in that same period.

[Images: Toyota, Honda]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 13 comments
  • Mopar4wd Mopar4wd on Apr 23, 2020

    Wholsale auction (here in the North East) number of sales were up this week after almost a month of really low sales. Still not normal but more like 40-50% normal volume instead of 20-30% of normal volume it had been. Sale prices seem down but not by as much as you would think (Don't have hard data but seems like less then 10%). Rumour is dealers are seeing a spike in cheap used car sales thanks to stimulus checks combined with tax refunds. Interesting too see how that plays out next week and beyond.

  • Robbie Robbie on Apr 24, 2020

    Some good may come of all this: let's hope that buying a new car can stay contactless! And who knows, maybe even dealerless!

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh A prelude is a bad idea. There is already Acura with all the weird sport trims. This will not make back it's R&D money.
  • Analoggrotto I don't see a red car here, how blazing stupid are you people?
  • Redapple2 Love the wheels
  • Redapple2 Good luck to them. They used to make great cars. 510. 240Z, Sentra SE-R. Maxima. Frontier.
  • Joe65688619 Under Ghosn they went through the same short-term bottom-line thinking that GM did in the 80s/90s, and they have not recovered say, to their heyday in the 50s and 60s in terms of market share and innovation. Poor design decisions (a CVT in their front-wheel drive "4-Door Sports Car", model overlap in a poorly performing segment (they never needed the Altima AND the Maxima...what they needed was one vehicle with different drivetrain, including hybrid, to compete with the Accord/Camry, and decontenting their vehicles: My 2012 QX56 (I know, not a Nissan, but the same holds for the Armada) had power rear windows in the cargo area that could vent, a glass hatch on the back door that could be opened separate from the whole liftgate (in such a tall vehicle, kinda essential if you have it in a garage and want to load the trunk without having to open the garage door to make room for the lift gate), a nice driver's side folding armrest, and a few other quality-of-life details absent from my 2018 QX80. In a competitive market this attention to detai is can be the differentiator that sell cars. Now they are caught in the middle of the market, competing more with Hyundai and Kia and selling discounted vehicles near the same price points, but losing money on them. They invested also invested a lot in niche platforms. The Leaf was one of the first full EVs, but never really evolved. They misjudged the market - luxury EVs are selling, small budget models not so much. Variable compression engines offering little in terms of real-world power or tech, let a lot of complexity that is leading to higher failure rates. Aside from the Z and GT-R (low volume models), not much forced induction (whether your a fan or not, look at what Honda did with the CR-V and Acura RDX - same chassis, slap a turbo on it, make it nicer inside, and now you can sell it as a semi-premium brand with higher markup). That said, I do believe they retain the technical and engineering capability to do far better. About time management realized they need to make smarter investments and understand their markets better.
Next