'Not Impossible': Nissan COO Talks Cash, Thinking Small Ahead of Comeback Plan

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

For an automaker that was already bleeding money and watching sales tallies shrink like a man who’s just hopped in the pool, the coronavirus pandemic came along at exactly the wrong time for Nissan.

As its lays off up to 10,000 U.S. workers amid an industry-wide shutdown, Nissan’s chief operating officer is already thinking about a brighter, more certain future.

Ashwani Gupta didn’t exactly lay out the entire recovery plan Nissan is expected to reveal in May, but he did offer up some teasers. For example: asset sales? Those seem to be off the table for now, marking a departure from previous thinking.

Calling the current situation a challenge, but “not impossible,” Gupta told Bloomberg Television, “Before talking about asset sales, we are focused on how we can capitalize existing assets.”

One way that strategy could bear fruit is by turning the automaker’s transmission unit, Jatco, into a purveyor of electrification hardware. Other assets owned by alliance partners Renault and Mitsubishi could find new roles, not owners, Gupta added.

One course the automaker isn’t straying from is its plan cut 12,500 heads from its global workforce. Global sales chasing and lofty targets will also remain the stuff of the Ghosn years, with Nissan embarking on a regional focus. Playing to its strengths in the markets that embrace the brand, then bolstering that effort. Services will also play a significant role in the company’s future, apparently.

At the beginning of what was already a bad year for the automaker, newly minted CEO Makoto Uchida urged shareholders to fire him if he didn’t pull off a successful comeback plan. That plan lands next month, with Gupta saying it will be “purely based on prioritization and focus.”

“It means that economic scale is not the only answer,” Gupta said. “We have to prioritize and focus where we get the maximum value.”

[Image: Nissan]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 9 comments
  • Schmitt trigger Schmitt trigger on Apr 08, 2020

    Nissan was already in bad shape before COVID-19 struck. I believe that this pandemic will bring Nissan to its knees, and out of sheer desperation to survive they will be required to do something really, really crazy. Like partnering with a smaller Japanese competitor and even perhaps an European partner, most likely a French one. Wait.....what kind of nonsense am I thinking? I apologize to everyone for my absurd comment.

  • Jeff S Jeff S on Apr 08, 2020

    Nissan could start with better automatic transmissions. An automatic transmission that grenades before 100k is not going to attract too many buyers.

  • Dwford I don't think price is the real issue. Plenty of people buy $40-50k gas vehicles every year. It's the functionality. People are worried about range and the ability to easily and quickly recharge. Also, if you want to buy an EV these days, you are mostly limited to midsize 5 passenger crossovers. How about some body style variety??
  • SCE to AUX The nose went from terrible to weird.
  • Chris P Bacon I'm not a fan of either, but if I had to choose, it would be the RAV. It's built for the long run with a NA engine and an 8 speed transmission. The Honda with a turbo and CVT might still last as long, but maintenance is going to cost more to get to 200000 miles for sure. The Honda is built for the first owner to lease and give back in 36 months. The Toyota is built to own and pass down.
  • Dwford Ford's management change their plans like they change their underwear. Where were all the prototypes of the larger EVs that were supposed to come out next year? Or for the next gen EV truck? Nowhere to be seen. Now those vaporware models are on the back burner to pursue cheaper models. Yeah, ok.
  • Wjtinfwb My comment about "missing the mark" was directed at, of the mentioned cars, none created huge demand or excitement once they were introduced. All three had some cool aspects; Thunderbird was pretty good exterior, let down by the Lincoln LS dash and the fairly weak 3.9L V8 at launch. The Prowler was super cool and unique, only the little nerf bumpers spoiled the exterior and of course the V6 was a huge letdown. SSR had the beans, but in my opinion was spoiled by the tonneau cover over the bed. Remove the cover, finish the bed with some teak or walnut and I think it could have been more appealing. All three were targeting a very small market (expensive 2-seaters without a prestige badge) which probably contributed. The PT Cruiser succeeded in this space by being both more practical and cheap. Of the three, I'd still like to have a Thunderbird in my garage in a classic color like the silver/green metallic offered in the later years.
Next