Ace of Base: 2021 Chevrolet Trailblazer L

ace of base 2021 chevrolet trailblazer l

Let’s be clear: sometimes an Ace of Base post is written purely to help shoppers of a particular make and model determine if the entry level option is worth considering. We are quite certain there are plenty of readers who will deride today’s entry simply because they don’t like the vehicle or its name. That’s fine; not everyone is a big fan of the compact crossover segment.

But they do sell, otherwise manufacturers wouldn’t be building the things. We can argue until we’re blue in the face about how OEMs sometimes wag the dog in terms of market demand but, for now, let’s see if the new-for-’21 Chevrolet Trailblazer is worth considering at its cheapest price point.

Unlike some of its competitors, the Chevy is offered with all-wheel drive, though it understandably doesn’t appear on the base L trim. Powered by a 1.2-liter turbocharged inline-three, a GM-estimated 137 horsepower and 162 lb-ft of torque should be enough to permit this bite-sized conveyance to get out of its own way. A continuously variable transmission is the sole gearbox option — a revelation sure to deflate gearheads but likely to go unnoticed by this car’s target market.

A 7-inch color touchscreen serves as a dutiful butler for infotainment chores, permitting audio streaming for two active devices plus Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. Seats are manual cloth but six-way adjustable for the driver, while the expected air conditioning is of the manual variety. One glaring omission is the absence of cruise control, seemingly not available for any price on the L, according to Chevy’s own build and price tool.

Automatic emergency braking and forward collision alert will let the driver know of impending doom, and one can expect lane keeping but not rear park assists in the L. There are 10 airbags and a federally mandated rear camera, proving just how far base Chevys have come in the last few years.

Those are sixteen-inch steel wheels on the L, by the way, paired with a single sad-sack color. No, really; you can have any color you want so long as it’s Summit White. At least the interior is black, not beige.

For a fiver under twenty grand, then, is the base Trailblazer an Ace of Base winner? Not quite, given it’s only available in white and the steering wheel blank will forever remind you that the thing doesn’t have cruise control (that, and your tired-after-four-hours right leg). Shop carefully in this segment, folks.

[Image: General Motors]

Not every base model has aced it, even the ones featured here. The ones which have? They help make the automotive landscape a lot better. Any others you can think of, B&B? Let us know in the comments and feel free to eviscerate our selections.

The model above is shown with American options and priced in American Dollars. Your dealer may sell for less.

Join the conversation
2 of 45 comments
  • Moparmann Moparmann on Mar 20, 2020

    To me, it seems as though the automakers are instituting a reverse "penalty box" type modus operandi. If you don't want all the safety nanny bells & whistles, or if you (heaven forbid!) want to shift your own gears, all that is available are the lowest spec, putrid color editions. The separate item/s that you do want are embedded within packages containing a LOT of what you DON'T want!!

  • Piratethecat Piratethecat on Mar 23, 2020

    It doesn't look that bad on the outside. Although I can't see a mainstream Chevy car interior and not think "rental". Will be interesting to see what the ATPs are on the Activ trim. Mid-upper 20s will do well (27 or 28k?). I think the sweet spot for this one model will be lower-mid 20s overall though. I think I'd rather have this than a Renegade. Not quite apples to apples, but I don't think shoppers in this category are slicing the niches as finely as manufacturers are.

  • Sgeffe Bronco looks with JLR “reliability!”What’s not to like?!
  • FreedMike Back in the '70s, the one thing keeping consumers from buying more Datsuns was styling - these guys were bringing over some of the ugliest product imaginable. Remember the F10? As hard as I try to blot that rolling aberration from my memory, it comes back. So the name change to Nissan made sense, and happened right as they started bringing over good-looking product (like the Maxima that will be featured in this series). They made a pretty clean break.
  • Flowerplough Liability - Autonomous vehicles must be programmed to make life-ending decisions, and who wants to risk that? Hit the moose or dive into the steep grassy ditch? Ram the sudden pile up that is occurring mere feet in front of the bumper or scan the oncoming lane and swing left? Ram the rogue machine that suddenly swung into my lane, head on, or hop up onto the sidewalk and maybe bump a pedestrian? With no driver involved, Ford/Volkswagen or GM or whomever will bear full responsibility and, in America, be ambulance-chaser sued into bankruptcy and extinction in well under a decade. Or maybe the yuge corporations will get special, good-faith, immunity laws, nation-wide? Yeah, that's the ticket.
  • FreedMike It's not that consumers wouldn't want this tech in theory - I think they would. Honestly, the idea of a car that can take over the truly tedious driving stuff that drives me bonkers - like sitting in traffic - appeals to me. But there's no way I'd put my property and my life in the hands of tech that's clearly not ready for prime time, and neither would the majority of other drivers. If they want this tech to sell, they need to get it right.
  • TitaniumZ Of course they are starting to "sour" on the idea. That's what happens when cars start to drive better than people. Humanpilots mostly suck and make bad decisions.