As Mazda's CX-3 Sheds Trims in the U.S., UK Buyers Can Expect a Disappearance


The smallest Mazda crossover, which happened to be too small for a friend of this writer, enters the new decade with a greatly reduced presence. Not just in America, but overseas, too.
While the U.S.-market CX-3 subcompact stands to lose all but one trim in a carefully calculated move by Mazda brass, a different plan is afoot on the other side of the Atlantic.
As reported by CarsDirect last month, 2020 CX-3 selection will amount to just the base Sport model, with the better-outfitted Touring and Grand Touring trims relegated to the wastebasket. This was done to put more room between the model and Mazda’s upcoming CX-30 crossover, which splits the size difference between the CX-3 and compact CX-5.
Hardly a strong seller, the new CX-3 reportedly starts at $21,685 after destination. That’s less than $1,300 below the CX-30’s starting price.
In the UK, Autocar reports that the CX-3 will vanish from the Mazda lineup for a period of time. While that market also receives the tweener CX-30, a brand spokesperson claimed the CX-3’s removal is merely temporary. In that market, like other EU countries, automakers are grappling with vastly stringent emissions regulations that go into effect in 2020; Mazda recently announced it will reduce the number of 2.0-liter MX-5 models sold in the UK to meet its fleetwide emissions limits.
It is believed Britain’s CX-3 will reappear only when it receives a new mild-hybrid 1.5-liter engine borrowed from its platform mate, the Mazda 2. With emissions in check, the CX-3 can then return to the lineup without threatening Mazda’s environmental standing. Of course, the model will still face newfound competition from its larger sibling.
In the U.S., the CX-3 sold 5,000 fewer units than the 6 sedan through November, with year-to-date volume down 5.9 percent. Overall, Mazda sales fell 8.2 percent in 2019.
[Image: Chris Tonn/TTAC]
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- SCE to AUX I charge at home 99% of the time, on a Level 2 charger I installed myself in 2012 for my Leaf. My house is 1967, 150-Amp service, gas dryer and furnace; everything else is electric with no problems. I switched from gas HW to electric HW last year, when my 18-year-old tank finally failed.I charge at a for-pay station maybe a couple times a year.I don't travel more than an hour each way in my Ioniq 1 EV, so I don't deal much with public chargers. Despite a big electric rate increase this year, my car remains ridiculously cheap to operate.
- ToolGuy 38:25 to 45:40 -- Let's all wait around for the stupid ugly helicopter. 😉The wheels and tires are cool, as in a) carbon fiber is a structural element not decoration and b) they have some sidewall.Also like the automatic fuel adjustment (gasoline vs. ethanol).(Anyone know why it's more powerful on E85? Huh? Huh?)
- Ja-GTI So, seems like you have to own a house before you can own a BEV.
- Kwik_Shift Good thing for fossil fuels to keep the EVs going.
- Carlson Fan Meh, never cared for this car because I was never a big fan of the Gen 1 Camaro. The Gen 1 Firebird looked better inside and out and you could get it with the 400.The Gen 2 for my eyes was peak Camaro as far as styling w/those sexy split bumpers! They should have modeled the 6th Gen after that.
Comments
Join the conversation
Is this where being small enough to experiment with your offerings comes into play? I don't particularly dislike this little bigger, but have never driven one and wonder if it's a bit too hefty for the 2.0 litre engine they've given it. I'm no speed demon and find the 2.5NA in the CX-5 to be perfectly adequate for my daily trundling about to work and on errands, but this thing looks a bit heavy. I suppose it's no worse than the original CX-5 with the 2.0 litre.
Owned a 2017 CX-3 Grand Touring for almost 3 years. Yes, it was small, very very small actually, but plenty of fun to drive. Decent power for the relatively small motor; small size of the vehicle (