Can EVs Go the Distance? EU Approves 3 Billion Battery Development Fund

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky
can evs go the distance eu approves 3 billion battery development fund

The European Union has approved a 3.2 billion-euro fund to promote the research and development of battery technology, with cash pouring in from Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Poland and Sweden. While Brussels has been on an electrification push ever since Europe fell out of love with diesel, now may not be the best time to double down on EVs.

We recently covered China’s ailing automotive market, noting the poor performance of new energy vehicles (which fell by at least 40 percent vs the previous November). We’ve also covered a survey showing how eager the nation’s consumer base appeared to be to purchase them, with both writer and readership wondering how reliable those figures actually were. Our collective dubiousness appears to have been valid. Despite being the top region for EV sales, new data from Bernstein Research claims about 70 percent of the 1.2 million electric or gasoline-electric hybrid models sold in China over the past year went directly to government or corporate fleets. When the government started removing subsidies, sales plummeted with little private interest to soften the impact.

Europe may be on a vaguely similar path. While worldwide EV sales are up about 13 percent through October, sales in North America are down 2 percent (at 301,000 deliveries), with Europe rising 37 percent (to 395,000). That’s partially due to European cities being closer together (with more charging points between them), though most EU member states also offer various electric vehicle purchasing incentives and tax exemptions. They’ve likewise adopted stricter environmental rules that make EVs more appetizing to own in the future.

While recession fears abound, Europe doesn’t appear to be suffering on the same level as China. Still, signs of big trouble looming over the horizon exist. Economic growth has almost ground to a halt, unemployment is creeping up, profit margins are shrinking, and people are coming out in droves to protest various governments. The one bright spot appears to be the burgeoning new energy field and the automotive industry’s transformation into a cadre of electric-focused mobility firms. Yet it almost feels like a distraction from the real problem.

Despite countless reports on how EVs will change the world and surveys claiming to show how interested consumers are, few are actually buying them. Electric cars (including plug-in hybrids) still account for just 2.1 percent of global auto sales, yet they’re somehow supposed to break even with internal combustion models by 2025. At least, that used to be the prevailing assumption; more recent estimates are all over the place. We’ve seen oil companies going no higher than 32 percent EV market saturation by 2040, with electrically minded manufacturers suggesting closer to 50 percent by 2030. Those are both exceedingly optimistic for the respective groups.

Meanwhile, manufacturers are cutting thousands of jobs in order to free up more cash for new technologies. Considering the above, you might be asking yourself why they’d even bother.

Many have suggested true EV competitiveness is just one major battery advancement away. Cheaper energy storage with better range and a superior shelf life is widely believed to be the key toward supplanting internal combustion vehicles, but such an advancement probably won’t bring back those missing jobs. People are starting to get upset.

Germany’s largest labor union, IG Metall, expressed caution on advancing “electromobility” at the expensive of jobs back in 2015. Last year, it began estimating the number of positions that will be lost.

“By 2030 every second job in passenger car powertrain will be impacted directly or indirectly by electromobility,” IG Metall’s chief, Joerg Hofmann, said in reference to a 2018 study using data provided by Daimler, BMW, Volkswagen, Bosch and Schaeffler. “Politicians and industry now need to develop strategies to manage this transformation.”

Maybe that’s what the EU is attempting to do. According to the Financial Times, the European Union expects the €3 billion battery investment deal to lead to an additional €5 billion in private investment through 2031.

From FT:

Margrethe Vestager, executive vice-president in charge of promoting technology in Europe and competition commissioner, said: “Battery production in Europe is of strategic interest for our economy and society because of its potential in terms of clean mobility and energy, job creation, sustainability and competitiveness.”

She added: “The approved aid will ensure that this important project can go ahead without unduly distorting competition.”

Maroš Šefčovič, vice-president for interinstitutional relations and foresight, said: “Thanks to intensive efforts by seven member states, industry and the commission, Europe’s first major pan-European battery ecosystem is emerging, with lead projects in all segments of this strategic value chain.”

As you might have noticed from the abundance of buzz terms, those quotes are largely meaningless. But Europe has to do something, as its manufacturers, member states, and labor unions are all messily tangled together while the EU is pushing staunch environmental reforms. This is where Europe matches China the closest and gives us the most reason to worry.

Chinese automakers have even deeper ties with the government; they basically have to assemble EVs or suffer the consequences of failing to adhere to mandatory sales quotas. At the same time, its citizens are losing their purchasing power. We’ve already seen this negatively impact electric vehicle sales, which continue to cost far more than similarly equipped gasoline-burning cars, after subsidies were cut. This has left countless EV startups to wither on the vine after China did its utmost to ensure hundreds came into existence.

The United Kingdom also started cutting subsidies this year, causing EV sales to drop rather swiftly. The Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) immediately blamed a lack of government support for the negative growth.

“Another month of decline is worrying but the fact that sales of alternatively fueled cars are going into reverse is a grave concern. Manufacturers have invested billions to bring these vehicles to market, but their efforts are now being undermined by confusing policies and the premature removal of purchase incentives,” said SMMT CEO Mike Hawes over the summer.

“If we are to see widespread uptake of these vehicles, which are an essential part of a smooth transition to zero-emission transport, we need world-class, long-term incentives and substantial investment in infrastructure.”

Unfortunately, the UK has basically said it cannot continue supporting the transition to EVs through incentives without dipping into its emergency funds.

Here’s the bottom line. Automakers the world over are killing jobs because they don’t need the same production capacities that they used to. The global auto market is cooling off and factories still have to contend with adhering to stringent emission rules and fines — while also turning a profit. Repositioning product goals appears to be the industry’s preferred solution, but running into the arms of electromobility has proven itself to be cripplingly expensive and may not be sustainable for every manufacturer to try and tackle. Despite strong governmental and societal pressures, consumers just aren’t playing along. And if something doesn’t change soon, we’re going to have huge companies going bankrupt because they’ve sunk their savings into developing products and services no one wanted.

Worse yet, there’s no obvious Plan B. Regulatory mandates basically force automakers to transition to EVs over the next decade, but technological gaps continue making them a financial black hole.

[Image: RossHelen/Shutterstock]

Join the conversation
4 of 16 comments
  • EGSE EGSE on Dec 11, 2019

    “By 2030 every second job in passenger car powertrain will be impacted directly or indirectly by electromobility,”.............“Politicians and industry now need to develop strategies to manage this transformation.” Left unsaid in all the rhetoric is the primary responsibility of the workers to start thinking about their own financial future. Lying prostrate on the ground waiting for a politician or auto executive to pick you up and carry you is crazy. There is little incentive for a cash-strapped manufacturer to invest in someone who won't be around to add to their bottom line.

  • Schmitt trigger Schmitt trigger on Dec 12, 2019

    As a former hybrid owner, and user of many other battery powered gadgets, the main sticking point is the cost of battery REPLACEMENT. Sooner or later it will be required. If not for the original owner, then for the second hand owner. The result? Plummeting resale prices.

    • See 1 previous
    • Mcs Mcs on Dec 12, 2019

      @schmidt trigger: EV batteries using newer technology are being produced now that will outlast an ICE engine. At least a couple of companies including Tesla have found the right additives to solve degradation issues. I think it's a problem of the past at this point for some manufacturers and the batteries are going to outlast the car. I personally have around 93k thousand miles on a battery and it still charges to 100% and has all 12 range bars. There are numerous other articles. They now know the exact mechanism that causes degradation. My battery was before they knew the specific causes and I think it has increased nickel to extend its life. They've since discovered other additives that are even better at preventing degradation. They're not just lab discoveries that are years from production. These formula changes are already going into production without a lot of changes to production equipment. Technologies like solid-state are taking longer because of the major changes needed for production technology. For example, Toyota will be introducing its solid-state battery in summer 2020, but it will be about 5 years before it goes into production.

  • Conundrum Can't see that the Espada chassis had much to do with the Miura. The Miura had a rear-mounted transverse V12 with the transmission and final drive all part of the engine block. So it's a bit of a stretch saying the north-south V12 and regular transmission Espada chassis was related to the Miura. It looks to be no more than an update of the 400 GT. And short and long-arm independendent suspension was hardly unique -- a '53 Chev had that in front, it was standard for years on most cars that didn't have Mac struts. The Brits call SLA suspension double wishbone, so Honda thought that sounded more mysterious than SLA and used that terminology in ads, but it's the same thing. Only a few mid '30s cars had same length upper and lower A-arms like a '36 Chev, before the obvious advantage of a short upper arm for camber control was introduced. Of course Ford used a dead beam front axle until 1949, so it was last to climb out of the stone age.Do you have a link to a reference that says the Miura and Espada chassis were related?
  • FreedMike One of the things that we here in North America often forget about Europe is that it's a COMPLETELY different world to drive in. Imagine driving in the downtown area of the city you live in 24/7, and never leaving it, and you have a decent simulation of what it's like to drive in a place like Paris, or London, or Rome - or Manhattan, for that matter. As far as the "dystopia" is concerned, I don't really see it that way. This isn't made for people living in the 'burbs - it's for urban dwellers. And for that application, this car would be about perfect. The big question is how successful the effort to provide large-scale EV charging in urban areas will be.
  • Matzel I am hoping that Vee-Dub will improve the UX and offer additional color options for the 2024 Mk8.5 refresh for Canada. Until then, I'll be quite happy with my '21 GTI performance pack. It still puts a smile on my face going through the twisty bits.
  • Stanley Steamer There have been other concepts with BYOT, that I have always thought was a great idea. Replacing bespoke parts is expensive. If I can plug in a standard 17" monitor to serve as my instrument panel, as well as speakers, radio, generic motors, batteries, I'm for it. Cheaper repair, replacement, or upgrade costs. Heck I'd even like to put in my own comfy seats. My house didn't come with a built in LaZboy. The irony is that omitting these bespoke items at the point of sale allows me to create a more bespoke car as a whole. It's hard to imagine what an empty rolling monocoque chassis would look like capable of having powertrains and accessories easily bolted on in my garage, but something like the Bollinger suv comes to mind.
  • Iam65689044 Sometimes I'm glad the French don't sell in America. This is one of those times.