Piston Slap: Windsor Torque Begets a Lordstown Diesel?
TTAC Commentator MacMcMacmac writes:
Good day Sajeev,
I am contemplating doing something I never thought I would… buying a GM product. A used GM! I have recently negotiated the purchase of a home which will result in me commuting roughly 30 km to work, one-way. Now, that doesn’t seem like a whole lot, considering it will be mostly highway, but it is roughly 10 times as long as my current commute. My 2009 Focus is getting shabby, and although it has proven to be exceptionally reliable, age and road salt is taking its toll on the bodywork. So in light of this, I have decided it is time to find my next vehicle.
I was positively inclined toward the Cruze as soon as it came out. When I read its diesel made not a whole lot less torque than my old 5.0 LX, I was shocked. For me, the gutlessness of four-cylinder engines is something that truly destroys the enjoyability of any vehicle afflicted with one. I guess that old 302 loping down the road spoiled me for effortless engine response, despite it being nothing special nowadays in terms of output.
I am thinking this 2.0 turbo oil burner might provide the best of both worlds at a reasonable buy-in. Do you or anyone on the board have any experience with the Cruze Diesel in terms or reliability, durability and general liveability? This would break my streak of buying five Ford products in a row. The Cruze Diesel in question is a 2014 with 80K, no rust, leather, yadda-yadda….The diesel engine premium seems to have been eaten by the first owner, as the price seems in line with gas Cruzes of the same age.
Has this engine/transmission proven reliable over the long haul?
How funny: years ago I felt a similar connection when my 5.0 HO Fox Body Cougar sat next to my then-girlfriend’s Jetta TDI. I occasionally, fondly remember the gutsy Vee-Dub (ironically traded-in on a 2008 Focus), but I digress…
Aside from assorted complaints about Chevy dealers, I see few (if any) worrying trends regarding Diesel Cruze problems. So find your future go-to repair shop based on the expertise of their diesel technicians. Both independent shops and dealers can have good diesel techs, but you gotta do the legwork to find them.
And like all ubiquitous automotive cockroaches with aftermarket alternatives, I reckon you will save metric tons of money buying non-diesel specific Cruze parts online.
Aside from the aforementioned local diesel technician concern, I see no reason to not buy a Diesel Cruze. Matter of fact, I’m kinda thinking — since we have similar taste in vehicles — that I shoulda bought one instead of my 2011 Ranger. Nah, the Ranger’s somewhat Cruze-adjacent after doing aftermarket torque boosting and ride comfort enhancements.
So get the Cruze Diesel, unless you can’t bear to break your Ford-buying streak. What say you, Best and Brightest?
[Image: General Motors]
Send your queries to sajeev@thetruthaboutcars.com. Spare no details and ask for a speedy resolution if you’re in a hurry…but be realistic, and use your make/model specific forums instead of TTAC for more timely advice.More by Sajeev Mehta
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Steve Biro I’ll try one of these Tesla driverless taxis after Elon takes one to and from work each and every day for five years. Either he’ll prove to me they are safe… or he’ll be dead. Think he’ll be willing to try it?
- Theflyersfan After the first hard frost or freeze - if the 10 day forecast looks like winter is coming - that's when the winter tires go on. You can call me a convert to the summer performance tire and winter tire car owner. I like the feel of the tires that are meant to be used in that season, and winter tires make all of the difference in snowy conditions. Plus, how many crazy expensive Porsches and Land Rovers do we see crashed out after the first snow because there's a chance that the owner still kept their summer tires on. "But...but...but I have all wheel drive!!!" Yes, so all four tires that now have zero grip can move in unison together.
- Theflyersfan One thing the human brain can do very well (at least hopefully in most drivers) is quickly react to sudden changes in situations around them. Our eyes and brains can quickly detect another driving dangerously, a construction zone that popped up while we were at work, dense fog out of nowhere, conflicting lines and signs on some highways, kids darting out between cars, etc. All of this self driving tech has shown us that it is maybe 80% of the way there, but it's that last 20% that still scares the crap out of us. Self driving computers can have multiple cameras feeding the system constant information, but can it react in time or can it work through conflicting data - think of construction zones with lines everywhere, orange signs with new exit information by the existing green exit sign, etc. Plus, and I think it's just GM's test mules, some systems require preexisting "knowledge" of the routes taken and that's putting a lot of faith in a system that needs to be updated in real time. I think in the next 15-20 years, we'll have a basic system that can self drive along interstates and highways, but city streets and neighborhoods - the "last mile" - will still be self drive. Right now, I'd be happy with a system that can safely navigate the slog of rush hour and not require human input (tapping the wheel for example) to keep the system active.
- Kcflyer night and day difference. Good winter tires save lives or at least body work. And they are free. Spend a few hundred on spare wheels on tire rack. Mount the winter tires on them. They replace your regular tires and save a commensurate amount of wear. Thus, over the life of the vehicle the only added expense is the extra wheels. I can usually find a set of used wheels for less than 400 bucks all in on craigslist or marketplace. Then swap the wheels yourself twice a year. TPMS has added a wrinkle. Honda has the best system that requires little or no expense. Toyota/Lexus has a stupid system that requires a shop visit to program every stinking time. Ugh (worth it over a honda since your valves don't need to be cleaned every 60000 miles)
- Bruce Purchased (in 2024) a 1989 Camero RS. I wasn't looking for one but I picked it up for 1500. I wanted to only pay 800 but the fellow I bought it from had a real nice family and I could tell they loved each other. They needed the money and I had to give it to him. I felt my heart grow like the Grinch. Yes it has the little 2.8. But the write up does not represent this car. It has never been messed with, all original, a real time machine. I was very fond of these 3rd gen Cameros. It was very oxidized but straight, interior was dirty but all there. I just retired and I parked in my shop and looked at it for 5 months. I couldn't decide how to approach it now That I can afford to make of it what ever I want. Resto mod? Engine swap? No reason to expect any finacial return. Finally I started just doing little things. Buffed and polished the paint. Tune up, Fluids. I am still working it and have found a lot of joy in just restoring what I have just the way I found it just fixed and cleaned up. It's just a cool looking cruiser, fun to drive, fun to figure out. It is what it is. I am keeping it and the author of this critical write up completely misses the point. Mabey the point is what I make it. Nothing more and nothing less.
Comments
Join the conversation
I saw ONE Cruze with a clatter-engine in the wild, last year, that's it. Granted we are into anecdote and one data point, but my suggestion is no diesel. Now, I like them...we had two of the old, indestructable VW Diesels.....I loved my various Toyota, BMW and Renault Diesels rented on vacations...but.... Here in the US, our diesel fuel sucks. Imagine buying a Vette and having to feed it 87 octane all the time-I eventually bought a big tin of Cetane Boost from Amsoil...also, heavy trucks expect you to replace Diesel Particulate Filters, and EGR equipment. The VW (check the GM car) had it all buried between firewall and engine. Replacement was a $3500 day, at 73k miles. You just ate all your fuel savings. BMW Diesels in the US have had massive carbon fouling issues as well...a five figure trip to the dealer. The car that replaced it, a Jetta S, with a 1.4 liter turbo, gets 32 mpg vs the 39 mpg of the TDI. Other than the big torque curve, the TDI and S are pretty much equal for performance, if not soundproofing, but that is marketing. Kills me to say it, but no diesel in North America....
Personally if I could get the Cruze diesel for below market I would because nobody is buying these esp if its a stick. But for real money I would steer clear. You won't find it will be easy to have serviced, parts could be a problem, and no one will want to buy it from you later should you need to dump it.