Too Big? Mini Boss Thinks So, Aims to Pare Down Brand's Smallest Model

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Compared to the original BMC Mini from back in the Sixties, the modern Mini launched at the dawn of the 21st century was a portly affair, expanded in all directions to accommodate modern people with modern lives. And, compared to that first “new” Mini, the most recent generation of the three-door hatch looks positively ginormous. Somewhere along the way, Mini became not all that small.

Mini wants to correct the bloat, but only to a degree.

Speaking to Autocar, Mini head Bernd Körber said design work had begun on the fourth-generation Mini hatch, adding he’d “love to see the core Mini shrink again.” That vehicle should reach production for 2022 or 2023.

At the other end of the Mini range, the brand would like to see something still larger to tempt those not enamored by Mini’s big boy, the Countryman crossover. Reported recently by Autocar, the Mini brand intends to offer a compact crossover built atop whatever replaces the BMW i3. That means a choice of gasoline, plug-in hybrid, or electric powerplant. It also means a further stretching of what it means to be a Mini.

“The Countryman is a very small SUV,” Körber said. “In the U.S. and China, there are certain needs. We will look at a compact SUV in the next generation. There are lots of benefits with a car like that for urban use. For me, it’s a good match.”

While he admits it “would be hard to imagine” a Mini-branded vehicle the size of a BMW X3 or X5, that’s the way the market’s headed. The model could revive the Traveller name of yore.

But back to the entry-level hatch. The general consensus at Mini is that the current-gen hatch boasts a front overhang that’s unbecoming of the model’s heritage, meaning the model’s successor will take pains to slim down, at least in the front end.

“Hopefully in the next generation, we can make it even more compact, back to where Mini comes from,” Körber said.

Mini’s stable of compact offerings makes for an uneasy fit in the SUV-heavy domestic market, with the “large” Countryman unsurprisingly serving as its sales leader. Through September, however, no Mini model shows a volume increase in the U.S.; the brand as a whole is down 18.8 percent since the start of the year.

[Image: BMW Group]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 16 comments
  • Slap Slap on Oct 07, 2019

    Daughter has a 2018 MINI JCW. She has wanted a MINI ever since she was a young girl. But when the lease is up she'll get something else because it is just too expensive for what you get.

  • KOKing KOKing on Oct 07, 2019

    I have a current model Mini which I like, but it's definitely too big; it's the same width as my 3 series that it replaced, and packaging is terrible compared to, say, the similarly sized Honda Fit, which is ironic given the packaging miracle the original BMC one was marketed as. Given the near death of the small car market in the US (what's this rumor of the next Fit not making it here??), if Mini goes smaller, it would probably help outside the US, but maybe just get left out of the US lineup altogether.

  • SCE to AUX The nose went from terrible to weird.
  • Chris P Bacon I'm not a fan of either, but if I had to choose, it would be the RAV. It's built for the long run with a NA engine and an 8 speed transmission. The Honda with a turbo and CVT might still last as long, but maintenance is going to cost more to get to 200000 miles for sure. The Honda is built for the first owner to lease and give back in 36 months. The Toyota is built to own and pass down.
  • Dwford Ford's management change their plans like they change their underwear. Where were all the prototypes of the larger EVs that were supposed to come out next year? Or for the next gen EV truck? Nowhere to be seen. Now those vaporware models are on the back burner to pursue cheaper models. Yeah, ok.
  • Wjtinfwb My comment about "missing the mark" was directed at, of the mentioned cars, none created huge demand or excitement once they were introduced. All three had some cool aspects; Thunderbird was pretty good exterior, let down by the Lincoln LS dash and the fairly weak 3.9L V8 at launch. The Prowler was super cool and unique, only the little nerf bumpers spoiled the exterior and of course the V6 was a huge letdown. SSR had the beans, but in my opinion was spoiled by the tonneau cover over the bed. Remove the cover, finish the bed with some teak or walnut and I think it could have been more appealing. All three were targeting a very small market (expensive 2-seaters without a prestige badge) which probably contributed. The PT Cruiser succeeded in this space by being both more practical and cheap. Of the three, I'd still like to have a Thunderbird in my garage in a classic color like the silver/green metallic offered in the later years.
  • D Screw Tesla. There are millions of affordable EVs already in use and widely available. Commonly seen in Peachtree City, GA, and The Villages, FL, they are cheap, convenient, and fun. We just need more municipalities to accept them. If they'll allow AVs on the road, why not golf cars?
Next