That Elon Musk Defamation Case Is Getting Pretty Wild

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

If you’ve grudgingly followed the unseamly goings-ons in the defamation case filed against Tesla CEO Elon Musk by a British cave diver, things just took a turn. Documents filed to a California federal court this week by Vernon Unsworth’s lawyers reveal a plotline worthy of a better-than-average sitcom.

In stating their client’s side of the story, Unsworth’s legal team showcased communications from from Musk, in which the CEO expressed regret for calling the cave diver “pedo guy” on Twitter and sending accusatory emails to a Buzzfeed reporter. It also seems that the private eye Musk hired to dig up dirt on Unsworth is a convicted fraudster who’s now back in jail for parole violation.

Calling Musk a “thin-skinned billionaire” who attacked their client for criticizing Musk’s homemade submarine (an element of the Thai trapped-kids saga in which Unsworth played a key role), Unsworth’s legal team laid out evidence that their client did not marry a 12-year-old child bride — and that Musk knew it. The team hopes to collect $75,000 from Musk, plus punitive damages, clearing Unsworth’s name in the process.

The court document, posted by Buzzfeed, includes choice bits of communication between Musk and various outsiders, including an email to a PR consultant in which he calls himself a “fucking idiot” for embarking down this path.

The so-called P.I., James Howard-Higgins, allegedly contacted Musk out of the blue and offered to dig into Unsworth’s past. Unsworth’s lawyers cite evidence showing that the P.I told Musk that Unsworth’s Thai partner was at least 18 or 19 when they met, but Musk still emailed a reporter later that day to claim the British diver had married a 12-year-old. Unsworth’s team says he met his partner, Woranan “Tik” Ratrawiphukkun, in 2011 when she was 32.

Musk told the PR consultant that telling the reporter the story about the 12-year-old “was still one of the dumbest things I’ve ever done.” For his work, Musk paid Howard-Higgins $52,000, offering a $10,000 bonus if he uncovered real dirt. Musk is also alleged to have asked the P.I.’s help in leaking negative stories about Unsworth to media in Australia and the UK.

In another email, Musk claimed he could see why the homemade submarine looked like a “narcissistic PR stunt.”

Speaking of, the document claims that during the rescue of the trapped Thai soccer team, Musk and company were busying themselves in a little PR work of themselves, attempting to get a Thai regional governor to withdraw a statement that Musk’s submarine wouldn’t work.

As we’ve stated before, it’s interesting to learn the type of person who’s behind your favorite car. Musk, in the meantime, is attempting to have the suit dropped.

[Image: Tesla]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 17 comments
  • Incautious Incautious on Oct 08, 2019

    CEO of the year......NOT. just an immature child really. Can't believe any one would invest in this tool. Fleeced tsla shareholders of 2.6 Billion with the solarcity buy out which netted him a cool 560 million.

  • Iamwho2k Iamwho2k on Oct 08, 2019

    Memo to Unsworth's legal team: add a few zeroes before the decimal point. Make him feel it in the only way a billionaire can.

    • Lorenzo Lorenzo on Oct 08, 2019

      Musk's billions can't protect his fragile ego. That'll hurt more than any dollar amount.

  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
  • MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh [h3]Wake me up when it is a 1989 635Csi with a M88/3[/h3]
  • BrandX "I can charge using the 240V outlets, sure, but it’s slow."No it's not. That's what all home chargers use - 240V.
  • Jalop1991 does the odometer represent itself in an analog fashion? Will the numbers roll slowly and stop wherever, or do they just blink to the next number like any old boring modern car?
Next