Tesla Pickup Arrives in November, Still Sounds Insane
No one really expected electric pickup trucks to take off as a concept, save for the people developing them. While EVs still need to improve their maximum range to truly surpass combustion-reliant vehicles, modern examples perform much better than their predecessors. But battery size and vehicle weight remain important issues for the segment, making the idea of an electric work vehicle seem about as useful as an edible diaper.
Then the concepts started arriving, sucking far less than most of us expected. There were loads of new ideas, like interesting storage solutions and auxiliary power ports for tools — all stemming from electrification. What’s more is that the vehicle itself seems like it could benefit from the instant torque and lower center of gravity furnished by electric powertrains. Battery packs can also be made larger (improving range), as pickups have more areas to stash cells without intruding into the passenger compartment. Maybe this wasn’t a dumb idea after all.
Ford and General Motors have both confirmed the development of electric pickups, with the former currently running prototypes. Meanwhile, Rivian and Bollinger have already shown off their designs. EV darling Tesla had a truck it wanted to debut over the summer, but the model saw its release pushed back. Now, CEO Elon Musk has confirmed that the vehicle will emerge next month.
As usual, the announcement happened via Twitter — rather than through a corporately sanctioned statement. But it doubles down on Musk’s promise of a November debut for the product he’s been calling “Cybertruck.”
With new heat on the model, Elon was pressed for details. While those calls went largely ignored, there were a few tidbits he was willing to share. “Cybertruck doesn’t look like anything I’ve seen bouncing around the Internet,” Musk said of the myriad of mockups hoping to guess what form the vehicle will take. “It’s closer to an armored personnel carrier from the future.”
APCs vary quite a bit in their overall shape but are usually gigantic (in relation to passenger vehicles) with a lot of hard angles. While Cybertruck probably doesn’t need to deflect any enemy rounds, negating the purpose of angled armor, it’s assumed it’ll have a relatively aggressive shape. Musk has repeatedly noted that the truck will appear extremely modern, drawing some of its inspiration from films like Blade Runner. He’s also said the design “won’t be for everyone.”
The company’s singular teaser image (top of the page) is wildly unhelpful, as it gives nothing away. We’re not even sure what part of the vehicle Tesla’s showing, but it’s presumably a heavily photoshopped glimpse into the bed. Regardless, the company isn’t married to the styling. If the reception of the truck design isn’t terribly warm, the plan is to keep the platform and build a more traditional body around it.
Musk claims the truck will start below $50,000 and be superior to the Ford F-150 — America’s most popular pickup. “We don’t want it to be really expensive,” he previously explained. “I think it got to start at less than $50,000 — it’s got to be like $49,000 starting price max. Ideally less. It just can’t be unaffordable.”
While that doesn’t guarantee something similarly sized, it would be difficult to imagine Tesla outdoing Ford with a smaller truck. The main issue remains the vehicle’s battery capacity — something that becomes increasingly difficult to manage as a vehicle grows heavier. Fortunately, Tesla is already setting the benchmark for EV range; we don’t anticipate Cybertruck having a difficult time staying competitive in this regard.
It just needs to be built first.
[Images: Tesla]
Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.
More by Matt Posky
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Bouzouki It is easy to pick on GM in general, and the Cobalt in particular, due to the infamous ignition key cylinder issue/recall. And yet, back in the day, even Consumer Reports commented how it was "fun to drive" and every Cobalt should drive like that--though CR noted was expensive (around $20k base, $22-24k MSRP typical sticker). Car and Driver road tested one, with a mildly positive review, but not a rave. I need a car in late 2006, when my boss informed me I was losing my company car, as I would not be travelling for work. I wanted an inexpensive car with a manual trans. I drove a plebeian used Cobalt. I actually liked it. I came back, and was told I should not have driven that car, it was sold. But I liked the car, and started looking for a used one. So I went to another Chevy dealer. He had no manual trans Cobalts, new or used. No wait--he had this yellow supercharged SS. I could drive that. He unburied it (it had been sitting). It had the optional Recaro seat package. The car was a blast! If GM made a front-drive Camaro with a V8, this is what it might be like. I didn't like the color so I left. Then I found Car and Driver's first "Lightning Lap" test, circa 2006. In short, the Cobalt SS Supercharged that some here mock was FIVE seconds quicker than an 06 VW GTI. FIVE SECONDS! Even more impressive, it was a fraction quicker than a ... Mustang GT 5.0. A car with an extra 100 horses. So I looked and found a red one I generally like (options-wise. It needed the Recaro seats--best car seat EVER!). I had no problems with it over 4 years, 50k other than sliding into a curb on a snowy morning about a month after I bought it, causing about $2k of damage to suspension bits (the rim was gouged, but remained round! The tire was reused. The control arm and bearing and 1-2 other items needed replace, but car drove like new). I ordered some snow wheel/tires and put them on afterward. It was a good car in general, and a great-DRIVING car. The steering, shifter, exhaust note, power, engine smoothness. It was hard to believe this was a GM vehicle.... The back seat was big--but the ingress/egress was awful. I had too many cars at the time So I sold it after four years, one of the few cars I regret selling.
- JLGOLDEN Jeep, Dodge, and Chrysler don't have a suitable competitor for a high-volume segment such as compact crossovers. Abandoning Journey and Cherokee's $25K-$40K bandwidth, left the market to be eaten by Equinox/Terrain, Escape/Bronco Sport, Rogue, RAV 4, and on and on. Further, GM has reinvented entry-level with the striking new Trax and Envista. Nissan is swinging hard for new buyers with a re-invented Kicks. Instead of reading the room, Stellantis focuses on too many models with ambitious pricing at $50K and beyond.
- ToolGuy This might be a good candidate for an EV conversion.
- Tassos THE PERFECT TRUCK FOR ROUNDING UP IMMIGRANTS TO BRING THEM TO JAILS FOR FORCED TRANSGENDERED OPERATIONS. I HOPE ABDUL BUYS IT
- Tassos BEAUTIFUL GRYLL ON THIS ITERATION. NOT ENOUGH FINS AND NEEDS MORE WOOD VANEER INSIDE. I WANT MY 60s CADILLACS TO LOOK LIKE LOOMER. FIT FOR A FIRST LADY
Comments
Join the conversation
If there is "day use" for charging tools, wouldn't that ruin the range? Or would the draw be so low as to not matter on "range-to-home".
Tesla - we make the insane possible.