NTSB to Limo Operators: Buckle Up for Change

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems
ntsb to limo operators buckle up for change

In the wake of a deadly Ford Excursion limousine crash in upstate New York, the National Transportation Safety Board is calling on limo operators and builders to ensure passengers are belted in. It’s also calling on the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to make its recommendation the law of the land.

The 2018 crash in Schoharie, NY killed 18 occupants of the aging SUV-turned-limo, as well as two pedestrians. Using this crash and several others as a starting point, the NTSB’s study and subsequent report found that the only way to ensure passenger safety is the most obvious one: buckle up.

While the 2001 Excursion super-stretch retained the model’s original rear seats and belts and included belts for the perimeter-style bench seating, “the NTSB found the side- and rear-facing bench seats failed in the direction of the crash forces and that the strength of these seats and their anchorages were inadequate during the crash,” the report states.

“In comparison, the original Ford passenger seats in the rear of the vehicle remained attached to the floor and intact.”

Despite the passenger compartment of the limo remaining intact following the crash, none of the occupants were belted when the vehicle lost control on a steep grade. The NTSB feels the crash would have been survivable, had the seats remained secure and the belts properly anchored. And, of course, if the occupants were strapped in.

Two other fatal limo crashes ⁠— one in Elgin, Illinois, and the other in Cranbury, New Jersey ⁠— also saw fatalities, despite lower crash forces than those seen in the NY accident. Again, seatbelts were provided, but occupants chose not to wear them.

Especially with perimeter seating, “if seat belts on limousines are not readily accessible to the passengers, they are unlikely to be worn,” the NTSB claims.

The board’s recommendations are threefold. For one, it calls upon the NHTSA to “require lap/shoulder belts for each passenger seating position on all new vehicles modified to be used as limousines,” and to mandate that “seating systems in these vehicles to meet minimum performance standards to ensure their integrity during a crash.”

It also calls upon the National Limousine Association to educate its members on proper seat belt use and “develop methods to ensure seat belts are functional and accessible to passengers and encourage passengers to use them.” Lastly, the NTSB wants the New York Department of Transportation to “ensure all limousine seat belts are functional and accessible in their regular inspection process.”

[Image: Volvo Cars]

Join the conversation
6 of 9 comments
  • LeBaron LeBaron on Oct 07, 2019

    Okay, we all know that you are better off when buckled up and when the seats stay attached to the floor. I'm seeing nothing here or at the link that states the proximate cause of the accident. About all I'm getting from the links at the NTSB site is that the State of New York tried to stonewall the NTSB. Anybody have a clue what the cause was? Brake failure, driver health issues, what? After all, you are better off not having the accident at all. Paul

    • See 2 previous
    • Sgeffe Sgeffe on Oct 07, 2019

      @chuckrs I didn’t recall two people outside the vehicle being killed, either. Were they walking at the end of the offramp as the limo went careening through the guardrail at the “T”-intersection? I thought that limo barreled through the intersection and ended up partially submerged underwater in a creek adjacent to it.

  • Snooder Snooder on Oct 07, 2019

    Wait, how am I supposed to get a lapdance (or something more appropriate to the name) in the backseat of a stretch Hummer limo if everybody is buckled up? Lame.

  • ToolGuy 38:25 to 45:40 -- Let's all wait around for the stupid ugly helicopter. 😉The wheels and tires are cool, as in a) carbon fiber is a structural element not decoration and b) they have some sidewall.Also like the automatic fuel adjustment (gasoline vs. ethanol).(Anyone know why it's more powerful on E85? Huh? Huh?)
  • Ja-GTI So, seems like you have to own a house before you can own a BEV.
  • Kwik_Shift Good thing for fossil fuels to keep the EVs going.
  • Carlson Fan Meh, never cared for this car because I was never a big fan of the Gen 1 Camaro. The Gen 1 Firebird looked better inside and out and you could get it with the 400.The Gen 2 for my eyes was peak Camaro as far as styling w/those sexy split bumpers! They should have modeled the 6th Gen after that.
  • ToolGuy From the listing: "Oil changes every April & October (full-synth), during which I also swap out A/S (not the stock summer MPS3s) and Blizzak winter tires on steelies, rotating front/back."• While ToolGuy applauds the use of full synthetic motor oil,• ToolGuy absolutely abhors the waste inherent in changing out a perfectly good motor oil every 6 months.The Mobil 1 Extended Performance High Mileage I run in our family fleet has a change interval of 20,000 miles. (Do I go 20,000 miles before changing it? No.) But this 2014 Focus has presumably had something like 16 oil changes in 36K miles, which works out to a 2,250 mile average change interval. Complete waste of time, money and perfectly good natural gas which could have gone to a higher and better use.Mobil 1 also says their oil miraculously expires at 1 year, and ToolGuy has questions. Is that one year in the bottle? One year in the vehicle? (Have I gone longer than a year in some of our vehicles? Yes, I have. Did I also add Lucas Oil 10131 Pure Synthetic Oil Stabilizer during that time, in case you are concerned about the additive package losing efficacy? Yes, I might have -- as far as you know.)TL;DR: I aim for annual oil changes and sometimes miss that 'deadline' by a few months; 12,000 miles between oil changes bothers me not at all, if you are using a quality synthetic which you should be anyway.