QOTD: Overspending Overtures?

qotd overspending overtures

It happens to the best of us. Entranced by bigger tires or more horsepower or louder sound, we gearheads are susceptible to bouts of fiduciary myopia. Plugging a stereo system worth two grand into a knackered old Cavalier? Sure! Paying handsomely for a lift kit even though the old Silverado has rust holes like swiss cheese? Let’s go!

We’re all prone to the odd bit of automotive profligacy. Mine, perhaps surprisingly, involves a Ford Escort and some subwoofers.

In years prior to the likes of Ram pickups and GMC Sierras darkened your author’s driveway, a series of terrible Ford econoboxes passed through these hands. One of them was a then seven-year old 1992 Escort station wagon, resplendent in faded blue and sporting a five-speed manual transmission. I can’t imagine they made very many of them in that powertrain configuration, even in the 90s. Regardless, it was mine. Or at least partly mine. I went halves on the purchase price with my father.

After taking possession of the ignition key with a strange triangular head (remember, this was the height of the Ford/Mazda mashup), I marched down to Future Shop — think Best Buy before that company bought the place — and was sent into immediate sticker shock by the cost of Sony subwoofers and Alpine decks. A hasty trip to the local pawn shop revealed prices that were much more my speed.

Sure, it was a terrible waste of money but I was promptly able to shake the license plate off that little Escort and trigger car alarms in the tight confines of the streets of downtown St. John’s. The wide-open nature of a wagon, instead of having the woofers tucked away in a trunk, ensured that I now ask most people to repeat themselves. Remarkably, nothing ever got ripped off.

How about you? What was your biggest automotive waste of money?

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 42 comments
  • Ryoku75 Ryoku75 on Sep 24, 2019

    The only audio upgrade I've ever done was swapping a CD player Ford factory radio into my CVPI, that cost only $12. Good music doesnt need fancy audio systems. Plus, I don't want anyone breaking into my car.

  • Newenthusiast Newenthusiast on Sep 24, 2019

    I'm probably going to get criticized for this from those of you who seem to hate all season tires, but when I lived in Delaware and had the Q7, I had good all seasons, but still put on real winter tires. It was such a beast in the foul cold weather (and it helps that most od Delaware is flat). So my all seasons were really 3 season tires. But that wasn't the waste of money, since it was the family car and road trip vehicle. No, the waste of money was on the UHP winter tires (plus the -1 size on rims I needed to buy, plus installation fees, etc) that my wife's 135 needed. She was a convert after seeing how they helped the Q7. She demanded the best winter tires we could afford......and promptly drove my Q7 to work every day there was snow or ice or rain in the winter. And since school was usually cancelled (my kids took the bus anyway), I was always home with the kids and the 135 stayed in the garage. I think those winter tires had a total of 1500 miles on them when we moved to a place where we didn't need them (now in Hawaii). And all those miles where on dry days where a good all seasons would have sufficed in the winter. $1500 for all 4 (plus installtion) and barely used. I think in that situation, all seasons for that car year round was probably the better bet.

  • Sgeffe Bronco looks with JLR “reliability!”What’s not to like?!
  • FreedMike Back in the '70s, the one thing keeping consumers from buying more Datsuns was styling - these guys were bringing over some of the ugliest product imaginable. Remember the F10? As hard as I try to blot that rolling aberration from my memory, it comes back. So the name change to Nissan made sense, and happened right as they started bringing over good-looking product (like the Maxima that will be featured in this series). They made a pretty clean break.
  • Flowerplough Liability - Autonomous vehicles must be programmed to make life-ending decisions, and who wants to risk that? Hit the moose or dive into the steep grassy ditch? Ram the sudden pile up that is occurring mere feet in front of the bumper or scan the oncoming lane and swing left? Ram the rogue machine that suddenly swung into my lane, head on, or hop up onto the sidewalk and maybe bump a pedestrian? With no driver involved, Ford/Volkswagen or GM or whomever will bear full responsibility and, in America, be ambulance-chaser sued into bankruptcy and extinction in well under a decade. Or maybe the yuge corporations will get special, good-faith, immunity laws, nation-wide? Yeah, that's the ticket.
  • FreedMike It's not that consumers wouldn't want this tech in theory - I think they would. Honestly, the idea of a car that can take over the truly tedious driving stuff that drives me bonkers - like sitting in traffic - appeals to me. But there's no way I'd put my property and my life in the hands of tech that's clearly not ready for prime time, and neither would the majority of other drivers. If they want this tech to sell, they need to get it right.
  • TitaniumZ Of course they are starting to "sour" on the idea. That's what happens when cars start to drive better than people. Humanpilots mostly suck and make bad decisions.
Next