Why the Hell Not? Bugatti Mulls Building the Pinnacle of All Crossovers

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Bentley has one. Rolls-Royce has one, too. Lamborghini has one, and so does Maserati. The idea that a utility vehicle should be off-limits to builders of traditional passenger cars went out the window around the time Jaguar unveiled its second crossover.

Automakers everywhere are future-proofing themselves with the added cushion of a popular, high-margin CUV. It’s the equivalent of moving money out of stocks and into gold in the face of a looming economic downturn. So why not Bugatti, maker of the biggest-bucks, biggest-horsepower vehicles on earth?

Speaking to Automobile recently, Bugatti president Stephan Winkelmann said the exclusive brand is making progress in its plan to move beyond a single model line. All that’s missing is a green light.

“There are several alternatives [to the Chiron] under consideration. More power is always an option, as is less weight,” Winkelmann said. “Additional body styles are also an opportunity.”

As a subsidiary of Volkswagen Group, Bugatti has access to the talent and technology needed to pull off an SUV without going overboard on development costs. There’s a number of rumors afoot about who, exactly, Bugatti would partner with to help build such a vehicle.

“The design is done,” Winkelmann said of the looming utility vehicle. “Some potential customers have seen it, and they liked it. One or two influential people up in Wolfsburg were complimentary about it. But at this point there is no budget and no decision.”

When asked why the storied brand would put effort into making a crossover and not some sort of insane EV hypercar or luxury sedan, the answer was obvious.

“Because crossovers are in strong demand,” the brand’s president said. “So far, nobody is doing a high-performance, high-end luxury CUV. Because of the battery situation, it’s too early for an electric hypercar. Having said that, the more generously packaged CUV would almost certainly be battery-powered.”

The time for sedans has passed, Winkelmann said, adding that the brand doesn’t see enough volume in another traditional offering. He envisions 600 to 800 units a year for the unborn CUV. In the meantime, there’s still boundaries to push with the Chiron hypercar, with Winkelmann mentioning a possible 310-mph variant of the already nutso 8.0-liter W16 unicorn.

[Image: Volkswagen Group]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 14 comments
  • Ltcmgm78 It depends on whether or not the union is a help or a hindrance to the manufacturer and workers. A union isn't needed if the manufacturer takes care of its workers.
  • Honda1 Unions were needed back in the early days, not needed know. There are plenty of rules and regulations and government agencies that keep companies in line. It's just a money grad and nothing more. Fain is a punk!
  • 1995 SC If the necessary number of employees vote to unionize then yes, they should be unionized. That's how it works.
  • Sobhuza Trooper That Dave Thomas fella sounds like the kind of twit who is oh-so-quick to tell us how easy and fun the bus is for any and all of your personal transportation needs. The time to get to and from the bus stop is never a concern. The time waiting for the bus is never a concern. The time waiting for a connection (if there is one) is never a concern. The weather is never a concern. Whatever you might be carrying or intend to purchase is never a concern. Nope, Boo Cars! Yeah Buses! Buses rule!Needless to say, these twits don't actual take the damn bus.
  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
Next