At Least for Cars, Preliminary U.S.-Japan Trade Deal Keeps the Status Quo

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

There’s good news if you’re a U.S. farmer, however. A preliminary deal reached between the two countries this week would keep existing auto tariffs in place, though President Donald Trump claims there’s still the possibility of a hike.

It was the threat of import tariffs that brought Japan to the table following the U.S.’s 2017 pullout of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, and the agreement in principle announced this week keeps new tariffs off the table, though auto groups continue demanding action on an issue Lee Iacocca used to rail about: reciprocity.

Trump and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe signalled an agreement on the core principles of the deal during the G7 summit in Biarritz, France on Sunday. That city, by the way, is surely well stocked with Cadillacs.

As reported by Reuters, the preliminary deal would cut agricultural tariffs and potentially spell a boon for U.S. producers of beef, pork, corn, wheat, wine, and other products. Certain Japanese industrial goods would be exempted from tariffs, as well. The deal aims to generate new demand for U.S. products hit hard by the ongoing U.S.-China trade war, as well as making the United States more competitive with TPP-signed nations.

“If you say ‘win-win,’ it’s a capital letter ‘Win’ for the U.S. and a small-letter ‘win’ for Japan,” former Japanese ambassador to the U.S. Ichiro Fujisaki told The Japan Times.

Not exempted from existing tariffs are Japanese cars and trucks. Inbound passenger cars will retain a 2.5-percent tariff, with trucks saddled with a 25-percent import levy. When asked about the possibility of following through on earlier tariff threats, Trump responded, “Not at this moment, no, not at this moment. It’s something I could do at a later date if I wanted to but we’re not looking at that.”

For the Detroit Three, in this case represented by the American Automotive Policy Council, the preliminary deal sparked a take on the age-old labor question “What have you done for me lately?”

“Any potential trade agreement with Japan should lead to truly reciprocal market access for U.S. automakers,” AAPC president Matt Blunt said in a statement. “It must address long-standing non-tariff barriers in Japan, and include strong and enforceable provisions that prevent Japan from manipulating its currency to gain an unfair and unearned advantage for its auto exports.”

The vast majority of the trade deficit between the U.S. and Japan — $56 billion — stems from the lopsided flow of automobiles.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 29 comments
  • ToddAtlasF1 ToddAtlasF1 on Aug 27, 2019

    It seems like the horses are long gone, so the barn door isn't much of an issue. Ford is killing everything small in the US. GM is Chinese. Fiat is Italian. Various transplants might have opportunities for exports, but I don't see Japan having a growing car market in the future.

  • Slavuta Slavuta on Aug 27, 2019

    The Renegade, on the pic, is built in Italy. Are they bring them here and then ship to Japan?

  • Rochester I'd rather have a slow-as-mud Plymouth Prowler than this thing. At least the Prowler looked cool.
  • Kcflyer Don't understand the appeal of this engine combo at all.
  • Dave M. This and the HHR were GM's "retro" failures. Not sure what they were smoking....
  • Kcflyer Sorry to see it go. The interior design and color options in particular are rare in the industry
  • Wolfwagen Here is my stable. not great not bad I try to do as much as possible. I work for an Aftermarket automotive parts company so I can get most parts at a discount.i try to do as much of my own work as possible. My wife hates that I spend time and money fixing the vehicles but she doesn't want car payments either so...2019 VW Atlas 50K (wife's) Only issues so far were Brakes and normal maintenance.A Bad Cat Converter which was covered and a replacement of the rear bank head gasket which was a manufacturing defect due to improper torquing at the factory. All under warranty2003 Saab 9-5 Arc Wagon (my DD) 116 K picked up used last year. Replaced Struts, brakes, hatch struts, motor mounts, D/S swaybar link, Timing belt, water pump and thermostat Power steering pump Fuel pump, Both Front window regular rollers, Heater core and cabin air filter. Oil and transmission changes. Love the car but Saab/GM packaging is a nightmare.2005 Cadillac Deville (former DD now Son # 1 DD) picked up used 5 years ago with only 47K now 83K Plugs, coils, P/s pump, Water pump, hoses, P/S lines (mechanic job) evap valve, brakes, Front brake calipers and rear brake calipers. Currently has oil pan gasket leak - looking to have a mechanic do that2009 Mini Cooper (Daughters dd)picked up 2 years ago 67K Brakes and thermostat house to clear check engine light2001 Mazda Tribue (Son#2 dd) 106K picked last summer after he severely damaged a 2004 Hyundai accent. Oil changes
Next