Rare Rides: A 1974 Toyota Corona 2000 GT

rare rides a 1974 toyota corona 2000 gt

Today’s Rare Ride is a case of forbidden fruit. Though North American consumers could buy something similar, this Rare Ride was never on domestic shores as new.

It’s the Toyota Corona 2000 GT, from 1974.

Toyota’s Corona line entered production in 1957. A compilation of parts from a recently deceased Crown, it was made to fill the space the (now larger) Crown vacated. Over the years the Corona grew in size and model variation, and became an important global model for Toyota. Additional production began in Australia in the sixties, and by the early seventies it was also produced in Indonesia and South Africa.

After a short fourth generation of just four model years, the fifth-gen Corona entered production late in 1973. By that time it was a midsize entry, and occupied a place between the smaller Carina and the larger, more luxury-oriented Mark II. Body styles included two- and four-door sedans, a five-door wagon, and the rakish two-door hardtop coupe.

As expected, North American Coronas had big, chunky bumpers to meet new crash standards. Though a variety of engines were used in other markets, North American Coronas had just one: the 20R. Toyota liked the 2.2-liter unit for North American applications. Its 97 horsepower also motivated the Hilux and Celica of the period. Transmissions included three- and four-speed manuals, and a three-speed automatic.

For its domestic market only, Toyota built two hotter versions of the Corona. Dubbed the 2000 GT, a sporty sedan was accompanied by a hardtop coupe to form the top of the Corona line. These models used the twin cam 18R-G engine. A two-liter unit designed to fit into the small car tax bracket in Japan, the 18R-G produced 143 horsepower and 130 lb-ft of torque in a car that weighed around 2,200 pounds. North Americans stayed content with their 97-horsepower truck engine.

The Corona faced an uphill battle in the US. Front-drive economy was all the rage, and entries like the new Honda Accord and Subaru DL gained market share. The fifth generation finished off the seventies before it was replaced by a short-lived sixth generation that persevered through 1983. It was not missed, as Americans embraced the brand new front-drive Camry with open arms. By 1983 there was a front-drive Corona in other markets, as the model began its descent. Through the remainder of its life (model year 2002) the Corona turned into a Corolla-like vehicle for markets outside North America, and eventually spawned Caldina wagon variants.

Today’s burgundy beauty is a 1974 2000 GT coupe. All 143 horsepower are shifted via the five-speed manual, and everything looks in original condition. 2000 GT is yours for $25,995.

Images: seller]

Join the conversation
2 of 30 comments
  • Dukeisduke Dukeisduke on Jun 21, 2019

    I see a couple of things. The air cleaners don't look stock - knowing how anal retentive the Japanese manufacturers were about things like that, I'd expect to see a huge oval housing covering both carbs, with a snorkel coming off the front that's tilted down, the big stamped wing nuts at each carb that go pop-pop-pop once they make contact (ridges on the bottoms of the nuts that mate with grooves stamped in the housing - anti-vibration), and something like six of those flip-down clamps they like to use around the perimeter. I also see that the rubber body plugs are missing from the spare tire well.

  • Cimarron typeR Cimarron typeR on Jun 21, 2019

    This a good Rare Ride. I think though for the money a Celica coupe would provide the same enjoyment and looks like a close cousin. Theres a fairly clean orange coupe parked in my in-laws neighborhood that i'm sure is a nonrunner but a good candidate for restoration. I wish I had the time or space.

  • Sgeffe Bronco looks with JLR “reliability!”What’s not to like?!
  • FreedMike Back in the '70s, the one thing keeping consumers from buying more Datsuns was styling - these guys were bringing over some of the ugliest product imaginable. Remember the F10? As hard as I try to blot that rolling aberration from my memory, it comes back. So the name change to Nissan made sense, and happened right as they started bringing over good-looking product (like the Maxima that will be featured in this series). They made a pretty clean break.
  • Flowerplough Liability - Autonomous vehicles must be programmed to make life-ending decisions, and who wants to risk that? Hit the moose or dive into the steep grassy ditch? Ram the sudden pile up that is occurring mere feet in front of the bumper or scan the oncoming lane and swing left? Ram the rogue machine that suddenly swung into my lane, head on, or hop up onto the sidewalk and maybe bump a pedestrian? With no driver involved, Ford/Volkswagen or GM or whomever will bear full responsibility and, in America, be ambulance-chaser sued into bankruptcy and extinction in well under a decade. Or maybe the yuge corporations will get special, good-faith, immunity laws, nation-wide? Yeah, that's the ticket.
  • FreedMike It's not that consumers wouldn't want this tech in theory - I think they would. Honestly, the idea of a car that can take over the truly tedious driving stuff that drives me bonkers - like sitting in traffic - appeals to me. But there's no way I'd put my property and my life in the hands of tech that's clearly not ready for prime time, and neither would the majority of other drivers. If they want this tech to sell, they need to get it right.
  • TitaniumZ Of course they are starting to "sour" on the idea. That's what happens when cars start to drive better than people. Humanpilots mostly suck and make bad decisions.