Captain Obvious Arrives: UK Researchers Claim EV Charging Still Not Ideal
With Europe and China promoting aggressive emission mandates, including proposals to eventually prohibit the sale of internal combustion vehicles, electric cars look to be a shoe-in. The UK’s Committee on Climate Change recently recommended moving up the country’s 2040 deadline to end the sale of gasoline or diesel cars to 2035 as part of a wider target to cut the country’s net greenhouse gas emissions to zero by 2050.
Unfortunately, battery electric vehicles still represent less than 1 percent of the region’s new car sales. While EV sales rose 63 percent in April vs the previous year, the adoption rate doesn’t appear to be on the same track as regulatory measures pushed by various authorities.
According to government-commissioned poll from 2016, range anxiety appears to be the primary culprit in the United Kingdom. Most respondents cited recharging their battery as their biggest hangup, with elevated EV costs playing second fiddle.
To test the region’s preparedness for electric vehicles, David Wright, chief electricity engineer at National Grid UK tasked his colleagues with a 565-mile round trip between offices. According to the Financial Times, the mission’s goal was to test the feasibility of a long journey using the UK’s vehicle charging network, which varies greatly in terms of speed, accessibility and location.
“Nine hours of driving, four hours of charge,” Wright reminisced during an EV conference in London last month. (It should be noted that the event was being hosted by BP.)
From FT:
Parliament’s business, energy and industrial strategy select committee has described Britain’s charging infrastructure as “poor” and “lacking in size and geographical coverage”, and experts say this is one of the biggest barriers to the widespread adoption of electric vehicles in the UK.
Energy network operators, charging companies and motoring associations warn that questions over where and how quickly drivers will be able to charge their vehicles, and how much investment is needed in energy grids to support vehicle charging must be considered with far greater urgency if Britain wants to meet accelerated targets to decarbonise [sic] its economy.
Considering the last time I witnessed the UK’s electric charging infrastructure in action was when Jeremy Clarkson and James May attempted to drive a Nissan Leaf and Peugeot iOn to the beach in 2011, 4 hours of charging represented a marked improvement from their two days of goofing around. Charging times have come down while EV driving range and the prevalence of fast-charger points have gone up. However, National Grid’s 4 hours of waiting still doesn’t sound all that appetizing when one inserts themselves into the scenario.
Of course, every time I mention range anxiety, there’s a puff of smoke introducing a complete stranger who’s eager to remind me that most people do their charging at home, overnight. While absolutely true, not everyone has access to off-street parking or a secondary vehicle to use for road trips. This could be mitigated by a sudden leap forward in energy storage, but that’s not a guarantee.
“The [current] charging infrastructure, you can make it work,” said Dustin Benton, policy director at the Green Alliance. ”But if we want this to really take off we need big charging infrastructure.”
The UK thinks the best solution is to deploy more charging points, including some along curbside parking areas and at office car parks. For destinations further away than your place of employment, Britain also hopes to expand stations along major highways.
FT said that UK motorways are currently dominated by Ecotricity, a start-up that has installed 300 stations, yielding lackluster consumer reviews. Meanwhile, the Netherlands’ Fastned opened a new “superfast” 350 kW EV fast-charging station near Sunderland last month and has plans for five additional 50 kW sites in the area. Unfortunately, no car currently sold in the UK is compatible with its superfast charging stations.
BP has also begun incorporating charge points at its gas stations, along with Shell, but both companies express skepticism regarding the overall plan. While electrification could upend the oil business, the more likely scenario involves fuel companies attempting to gradually shift their business towards EV charging. Naturally, these companies are hesitant to invest without some kind of proof that the public will go crazy for electric cars by 2035 (and governmental support).
There’s also the question of the UK’s energy infrastructure. National Grid and local power providers have repeatedly expressed concerns that the government is pushing for rampant electrification without considering the added draw it would create on networks not built to cope with a large population of electric cars.
Graeme Cooper, project director for electric vehicles at National Grid, said a “really grown up discussion” needs to take place between the energy industry, transport sector, government and Office of Gas and Electricity Markets regarding the type of investments that will be required. That’s probably the best message to take away from this, too.
Regardless of how you feel about EVs, they won’t work if they’re foisted upon people with no plan to support them. And supporting them is a risk right now. Automakers and energy companies have nurtured the internal combustion engine for over a century and, despite seriously looking at EVs, their customer base and the surrounding infrastructure isn’t yet sufficient to support a total shift. This will require serious planning, plenty of time, and loads of collaboration — things all parties should keep in mind when making important decisions, no matter what country they’re in or which side of electrification push they’re on.
[Image: James W Copeland/Shutterstock]
A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.
More by Matt Posky
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Varezhka Suzuki Jimny, Toyota Century, and I know it technically just ended production but Honda e.
- CoastieLenn For those that care to read the details of the crash NOT included in this article but published elsewhere- this happened at nearly 10pm when the CRV was stopped in the center lane of travel, lights off, with the driver remaining in the car. Not only is it not known if Blue Cruise was being used, it would have been a nightmare for most alert human drivers to mitigate that driving the 70+mph speed limit on many sections of I-10 in Texas, much less an AV system.
- Jeff This is what I would want: Toyota has now released an affordable truck called the Toyota IMV 0. The newly developed vehicle made in Thailand comes with a rear-wheel drive and a gasoline 2.0-liter inline-four matched to a 5-speed manual transmission. NEW $10,000 Toyota Pickup Has Ford & GM Crapping ... YouTube · Tech Machine 8 minutes, 46 seconds Dec 26, 2023
- Jalop1991 At the same time, let's take these drivers off the road--at least the ones that haven't yet taken themselves off the road.I can guarantee, at no point was this guy or any of the dead Tesla-stans actually driving the car. They were staring at their phones, because, HEY, SELF DRIVING!!
- 3-On-The-Tree To Maintenance Costs His best friend did the union meetings and he said that there wasn’t a lot of negotiating taking place between the union and state because they were happy with how the state was treating them. He said it seemed more like a formality having the union.
Comments
Join the conversation
Looking at this I thought of this https://youtu.be/ozHAjusUSHY
BEV adoption rates will soar once people can fully charge BEVs in a maximum of five minutes, while getting a range comparable to a diesel car. The fact that BEV automakers stubbornly choose to build BEVs without these modest characteristics tells us that BEV automakers don't want people to buy BEVs either, or otherwise they certainly would have fixed the problem by now after all these years.