4-year-old Trades Booster Seat for the Driver's Seat

Anthony Magagnoli
by Anthony Magagnoli

A 4-year-old boy in Blaine, MN, traded his car seat for the driver’s seat, borrowing his great-grandfather’s SUV. At 4 years old, I can’t imagine having the understanding and capability to successfully operate a car. But little Sebastian Swenson proved himself to be a special case.

His motivation? Reese’s candy. I believe this to be one of the most noble reasons to steal a car.

As reported by Fox9 in Minneapolis, Sebastian climbed up on a walker in order to access the keys to his great-grandfather’s Hyundai Santa Fe. Craving some sugary goodness, he climbed in the car, stretching the lower half of his body to reach the pedals. Not only did he manage to back the car out of the driveway, but he then engaged drive and rolled away. I’m amazed at the coordination just this initial portion of his trip would require.

The wake of Sebastian’s destruction

I don’t remember much of anything from when I was 4 years old. My earliest memories of being behind the wheel of a car involved sitting on my father’s lap as he let me steer us down our neighborhood street. He says I was 3 at the time. A couple years later, I would figure out how to disengage the parking brake while playing in his 1984 Pontiac Sunbird. But, not actually knowing how it functioned, I ended up rolling the car down our driveway and into the street. Little Sebastian just might be a prodigy!

The pre-schooler demonstrated exceptional navigational abilities as he found his way out of his neighborhood and negotiated rush hour traffic on the multi-lane University Ave in Blaine, MN. Top speeds reached a blistering 15mph, which is fast when compared to my 4-year-old nephew Mason’s electric SUV — which tops out around 2.5 mph.

Wanting to get a 4-year-old’s take on the situation, I interviewed Mason for this piece. When asked if he thought he could drive Nonna’s (Grandma’s) car, he responded, “I don’t think.”

Relatively minor damage to the Santa Fe

One thing that Mason and Sebastian seem to share is their steering capability, or lack thereof. Sebastian managed to collect a few mailboxes and removed part of the front bumper via a tree during his journey. Despite not wearing a seatbelt, he was unhurt though his skirmishes and successfully arrived at the Speedway gas station — just as he’d planned. I hope that his family gets him a go-kart so that he can continue to develop his driving skills in a safe environment.

My final thoughts are regarding advanced driver-assistance systems and this sort of situation. Personally, I think we need more driver training, providing drivers with Sebastian-like confidence behind the wheel, without designing for Sebastian-like driving capability. With today’s commonly found semi-autonomous driving features, it’s quite possible that Sebastian may have made it to his destination without incident. He likely would have boosted his already high confidence while making no improvement to his actual capability, though.

[Images: Fox9 News]

Anthony Magagnoli
Anthony Magagnoli

Following 10 years in Toyota's Production Engineering division, Anthony spent 3 years as a Vehicle Dynamics Engineer for FCA. From modest beginnings in autocross, he won a NASA SpecE30 National Championship and was the 2017 Pirelli World Challenge TC Rookie of the Year. Aside from being a professional racecar driver, he is a private driving coach and future karaoke champion.

More by Anthony Magagnoli

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 18 comments
  • -Nate -Nate on Jun 17, 2019

    Glad the kid wasn't hurt no ran over anyone . -Nate

  • Nrd515 Nrd515 on Jun 20, 2019

    My friend's kid is 5 and he's been calling me for computer help with stuff since he was 3, so I don't see what would be so difficult about getting into a car and driving. Like me when I was 3, he could read fine, and most of his calls were "How do I do......?). Or he's telling me about some airplane video he found or asking me if I had any good ones for him to look up. Russian car wreck videos are becoming one of his favorite things to look at to. His dad can take the blame for getting him hooked on those.

  • W Conrad I'm not afraid of them, but they aren't needed for everyone or everywhere. Long haul and highway driving sure, but in the city, nope.
  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
  • B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
  • Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
Next