UK Cops Look to Crack Down on Distracted Drive-Thru Payments, Among Other Things
As part of its push to eliminate the scourge of distracted driving, the UK has given the country’s notoriously rigid police force a new tool to help eliminate road deaths: the ability to levy $256 fines and six penalty points to motorists paying via Apple Pay at the drive-thru.
Thanks to new laws that went into effect this spring, the police, some of which take great pride in ridding the country of tools that fell off an electrician’s belt, now have the power to turn that late-night McDouble run into a costly nightmare.
The new law effectively doubles the existing penalties for distracted driving, and reaching for the phone to pay at the drive-thru window can indeed fall under the heading of “distracted driving.” However, handing the employee cash or a card is somehow different and okay.
As UK drivers are only allowed six penalty points in the first two years after receiving their license, being caught using the Apple Pay phone app in the drive-thru would cause their license to make like British Leyland and disappear.
There’s no disputing that distracted driving is one of the great public safety threats of our time. Just the thought of looking down at a phone and sending even a one-word text while on the road sends shivers down this writer’s spine. A driver may as well be in the backseat, counting cars out the back window.
Still, the UK’s law seems remarkably tight-assed, even for Britain. According to the Sun, the new law prompted confusion from tech-savvy Brits eager to know exactly how their driving career could go pear-shaped.
From the traditionally cheeky paper:
Twitter user Jay Chase asked police if he could use Apple Pay at the fast food chain’s drive-thru service.
Greater Manchester Police Traffic replied: “If your engine is off and your handbrake applied and you’re parked yes. If your engine is on no.”
We take it that the driver of a Vauxhall Corsa, in the throes of a Mac Attack, would be in violation of the law if he paid via Apple Pay with the car in neutral, handbrake on, but the engine still running. After all, he might inadvertently press the handbrake button and lower the lever, depress the clutch pedal, bump the shifter into gear, and press down on the accelerator while rummaging for his phone in his jacket pocket.
Britain isn’t alone in adopting tough new rules to crack down on distracted and impaired driving. A recent brouhaha in Surrey, British Columbia (adjacent to the affordable and financially clean city of Vancouver) led to fears that police were targeting phone users in drive-thrus. Strict new laws came into effect in Canada following the legalization of marijuana.
After a wave of backlash generated by a video posted to Twitter, the Surrey RCMP detachment said it was not conducting cell phone enforcement at a particular McDonalds drive-thru. Instead, the detachment said, the officer in the video was offering a verbal warning after seeing the motorist using their cell phone while driving up to the drive-thru. No fine was issued.
Corporal Elenore Sturko told the Now-Leader (via Vancouver Island Free Daily), “Regardless of the fact that it’s a drive-thru or a parking lot, under the Motor Vehicle Act those are considered part of the roadway and still subject to enforcement of the B.C. Motor Vehicle Act.”
It isn’t known if the engine-off rule applies to Apple Pay drive-thru purchases, though Manitoba RCMP said late last year that using the phone for such purchases is okay. Using it for texting or talking in the drive-thru, however, is a big no-no.
In the U.S., 18 states and the District of Columbia prohibit the use of hand-held devices while driving.
[Image: Dusan Petkovic/ Shutterstock]
More by Steph Willems
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- EBFlex Garbage but for less!
- FreedMike I actually had a deal in place for a PHEV - a Mazda CX-90 - but it turned out to be too big to fit comfortably in my garage, thus making too difficult to charge, so I passed. But from that, I learned the Truth About PHEVs - they're a VERY niche product, and probably always be, because their use case is rather nebulous. Yes, you can run on EV power for 25-30 miles, plug it in at home on a slow charger, and the next day, you're ready to go again. Great in theory, but in practice, a) you still need a home charger, b) you paid a LOT more for the car than you would have for a standard hybrid, and c) you discover the nasty secret of PHEVs, which is that when they're on battery power, they're absolute pigs to drive. Meanwhile, to maintain its' piglike battery-only performance, it still needs to be charged, so you're running into all the (overstated) challenges that BEV owners have, with none of the performance that BEV owners like. To quote King George in "Hamilton": " Awesome. Wow." In the Mazda's case, the PHEV tech was used as a performance enhancer - which worked VERY nicely - but it's the only performance-oriented PHEV out there that doesn't have a Mercedes-level pricetag. So who's the ideal owner here? Far as I can tell, it's someone who doesn't mind doing his 25 mile daily commute in a car that's slow as f*ck, but also wants to take the car on long road trips that would be inconvenient in a BEV. Meanwhile, the MPG Uber Alles buyers are VERY cost conscious - thus the MPG Uber Alles thing - and won't be enthusiastic about spending thousands more to get similar mileage to a standard hybrid. That's why the Volt failed. The tech is great for a narrow slice of buyers, but I think the real star of the PHEV revival show is the same tax credits that many BEVs get.
- RHD The speed limit was raised from 62.1 MPH to 68.3 MPH. It's a slight difference which will, more than anything, lower the fines for the guy caught going 140 KPH.
- Msquare The argument for unlimited autobahns has historically been that lane discipline is a life-or-death thing instead of a suggestion. That and marketing cars designed for autobahn speeds gives German automakers an advantage even in places where you can't hope to reach such speeds. Not just because of enforcement, but because of road conditions. An old Honda commercial voiced by Burgess Meredith had an Accord going 110 mph. Burgess said, "At 110 miles per hour, we have found the Accord to be quiet and comfortable. At half that speed, you may find it to be twice as quiet and comfortable." That has sold Mercedes, BMW's and even Volkswagens for decades. The Green Party has been pushing for decades for a 100 km/h blanket limit for environmental reasons, with zero success.
- Varezhka The upcoming mild-hybrid version (aka 500 Ibrida) can't come soon enough. Since the new 500e is based on the old Alfa Mito and Opel Adam platform (now renamed STLA City) you'd have thought they've developed the gas version together.
Comments
Join the conversation
?! . Doesn't make sense to me, they're in a parking lot for all purposes . If the law says the drive up lane is considered the public roadway, does that mean they'll be maintaining it and re paving as necessary too ? . -Nate
I think the laws are different there compared to the US in regards to what is considered public.