Jaguar to End XJ Production; Company Promises a Resurrection

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Once the sedan of choice for discerning Anglophiles and 1980s crime-fighting New Yorkers played by Edward Woodward, Jaguar’s XJ has seen a long fall from grace. This summer, the stately model officially hits the ground.

Amid tanking sales for both it and its sedan stablemates, the Jaguar XJ will cease production in a matter of months, with the automaker claiming its death is merely a passing phase.

Confirmed by a Jaguar spokesperson via Jalopnik, the end of the XJ’s 51-year production run this summer paves the way for the future introduction of a different take on British luxury motoring.

In a statement, the spokesperson said Jaguar will “continue the XJ nameplate and will use its renowned engineering capability and technological innovation to ensure its longevity.”

If you’re thinking all of those Autocar reports were right, you’re probably correct. The British publication has long forecasted the impending death of the XJ and its rebirth as an electric vehicle, possibly one containing a hatchback. Design boss Ian Callum and his team are reportedly working on something that bears no similarities to the XJs of old.

Which is too bad, as the pre-2004, steel-bodied XJs are gorgeous creatures you probably don’t want to own — and certainly don’t want to work on. Updating your image, however, requires a change of clothes. The automaker has already made waves in the emerging green vehicle market with its I-Pace SUV, and an all-electric XJ fastback five-door would need to leave the past in the rear-view to tempt the younger, forward-thinking set that will supposedly buy this vehicle.

Europe’s newfound disdain for internal combustion vehicles has made going electric (or partially electric) essential to the survival of many models. Thankfully, Jag has the platform and related tech to swap the XJ into a new persona. It’s probably best to get the transition out of the way before Mercedes-Benz, BMW, and Audi go the same route.

With the model ending production at the UK’s Castle Bromwich plant this year, a successor can’t be too far away.

The XJ peaked in the U.S. in 1986 (the year after The Equalizer first aired), selling over 19,000 units that year, only to see its fortunes fall in the following decades. The last time U.S. buyers took home more than 10,000 XJs in one year was 2004. Last year’s sales tally amounted to just 1,579 vehicles, the worst showing since the recession year of 2009, with some months returning double-digit sales.

In April, 93 American nonconformists drove away in a new XJ.

[Images: Jaguar Land Rover, Murilee Martin/TTAC]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 20 comments
  • Stanley Steamer Stanley Steamer on May 30, 2019

    Electric Jag? I guess they'll call it the e-Type.

  • MKizzy MKizzy on May 30, 2019

    Chances are, the XJ will be brought back as a Navigator-sized 3 row crossover with a giant cat on the hood that does double duty as a forward collision sensor.

    • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on May 30, 2019

      I would suggest elephant instead of cat on the hood. First elephant is much bigger animal which is good. And second JR is owned by Indians - it makes sense to start transition now.

  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
  • MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh [h3]Wake me up when it is a 1989 635Csi with a M88/3[/h3]
  • BrandX "I can charge using the 240V outlets, sure, but it’s slow."No it's not. That's what all home chargers use - 240V.
  • Jalop1991 does the odometer represent itself in an analog fashion? Will the numbers roll slowly and stop wherever, or do they just blink to the next number like any old boring modern car?
Next